[Slackbuilds-users] package version problem (while building an sbo tool )

[LukenShiro]

martedì 13 novembre 2007, Robby Workman ha scritto:
> >  PKG_NAME=otp_R11B
> >  VERSION=5
> > the file will be 'otp_R11B-5-i486-1_SBo.tgz'
> I'm not sure of the best way to handle this.
> The upstream guys need to have a sane name/version scheme.

Sorry, but wouldn't it be better to rename this package as "erlang" 
or "erlang-otp", and format his version as "11B_5" or "11B.5"?
(the first "R" stands simply for 'Release' according to FAQ 3.2 
http://www.erlang.org/faq/faq.html )
It seems next major version will be R12, so maybe it isn't advisable 
putting version number as built-in in the package name.

-- 
GNU/Linux * Slackware 'current'
LU #210970 LM #98222 SU #12583