[Slackbuilds-users] [sbopkg-users] Sbopkg 0.27.2 Released
chess at chessgriffin.com
Thu Apr 30 18:42:10 UTC 2009
* Robby Workman <rw at rlworkman.net> [2009-04-30 13:18:16]:
> That the admin might want to get a "head start" on a renamed package
> before sbopkg has an updated version is a non-issue; he could do that
> regardless, and then the clobbering of the file on the next update
> wouldn't change anything, while the benefit is exactly as you surmised
> -- there's no danger of having an out-of-sync primary list of renames.
> A local renames file (or even a renames.d/ directory) should handle the
> remainder of the valid cases just fine, I think. The benefits of the
> renames.d/ directory would be similar to the /etc/modprobe.d/ directory
> -- it would allow for easier maintenance of local rename lists.
> All that said, I certainly wouldn't change this in the stable branch,
> and even in svn, my standard disclaimer applies: it's YOUR code. :-)
All excellent points, Robby. I agree that this is something that needs
to be looked at and addressed one way or the other. Thanks for bringing
it up -- it's now on the TODO. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the SlackBuilds-users