From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Sun Feb 1 22:23:20 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:23:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues Message-ID: I'm trying to apply the SlackBuild script for tinyerp-client, but it tells me that wxGTK is not present. It was, until I deleted it and just tried to re-install it. This is all on my newly refurbished -12.2 server/workstation. Unfortunately, it reminds me of the dependency hell I went through with early versions of Red Hat that prompted me to switch to Slackware. So, let me start from the begining so you folks can tell me what I've missed. When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: gtk+-1.2.10-i486-4 gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 gtk-doc-1.7-noarch-3dl gtkspell-2.0.14-i486-1 libgtkhtml-2.11.1-i486-1 pygtk-2.12.1-i486-2 But, when I try to build wxGTK-2.8.9 with the SBo SlackBuild script I see this: checking for GTK+ version... checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... no *** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly installed. configure: error: The development files for GTK+ were not found. For GTK+ 2, please ensure that pkg-config is in the path and that gtk+-2.0.pc is installed. For GTK+ 1.2 please check that gtk-config is in the path, and that the version is 1.2.3 or above. Also check that the libraries returned by 'pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs' or 'gtk-config --libs' are in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH or equivalent. So, /uar/bin/pkg-config is in root's path. gtk+-2.0.pc is located in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/. 'pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs' shows: [rshepard at salmo ~]$ pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 What have I missed? TIA, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From chess at chessgriffin.com Sun Feb 1 22:34:30 2009 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> * Rich Shepard [2009-02-01 14:23:20]: > I'm trying to apply the SlackBuild script for tinyerp-client, but it tells > me that wxGTK is not present. It was, until I deleted it and just tried to > re-install it. This is all on my newly refurbished -12.2 server/workstation. > Unfortunately, it reminds me of the dependency hell I went through with > early versions of Red Hat that prompted me to switch to Slackware. > > So, let me start from the begining so you folks can tell me what I've > missed. > > When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: > > gtk+-1.2.10-i486-4 > gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 > gtk-doc-1.7-noarch-3dl > gtkspell-2.0.14-i486-1 > libgtkhtml-2.11.1-i486-1 > pygtk-2.12.1-i486-2 > > But, when I try to build wxGTK-2.8.9 with the SBo SlackBuild script I see > this: > > checking for GTK+ version... > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config > checking for GTK+ - version >= 2.0.0... no > *** Could not run GTK+ test program, checking why... > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for > the > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GTK+ is incorrectly > installed. > configure: error: > The development files for GTK+ were not found. For GTK+ 2, please > ensure that pkg-config is in the path and that gtk+-2.0.pc is > installed. For GTK+ 1.2 please check that gtk-config is in the path, > and that the version is 1.2.3 or above. Also check that the > libraries returned by 'pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs' or 'gtk-config > --libs' are in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH or equivalent. > > So, /uar/bin/pkg-config is in root's path. > > gtk+-2.0.pc is located in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/. > > 'pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --libs' shows: [rshepard at salmo ~]$ pkg-config > gtk+-2.0 --libs > -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 > -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 > > What have I missed? > I can confirm that the wxGTK SlackBuild works fine on a full install of Slackware 12.2 -- I just did it today. :-) Is this a full clean install of Slackware 12.2? If not, what is not installed? And if it's an upgrade, what did you upgrade from? I think we need more information about the box. -- Chess Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Sun Feb 1 23:15:31 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Chess Griffin wrote: > I can confirm that the wxGTK SlackBuild works fine on a full install of > Slackware 12.2 -- I just did it today. :-) That's encouraging, Chess. > Is this a full clean install of Slackware 12.2? If not, what is not > installed? And if it's an upgrade, what did you upgrade from? It's a clean installation with data and other applications restored from the backup tape. I've had two weeks of the server/workstation being down; this past week because it just would not boot into any kernel I built. There was something in /etc that was overwritten by an earlier file on the tape, apparently because the mtime of the tape file was newer than that of the freshly-installed file. Friday night and Saturday morning I carefully did a file-by-file restore of /etc and the system now boots into the 2.6.27.7-generic-smp kernel. When I redid the full install Friday from the 12.2 distribution disks, I put everything from disks 1 and 2 on, but only kdebase and kdelibs because I run Xfce, not KDE. The original attempt was an upgrade from a working 12.1 system to 12.2. FWIW, a Slackware-experienced SysAdmin duplicated my problems on a virtual machine on which he installed -12.2 (his servers are still running -11.0), but his solution didn't apply to my situation. Regardless, I'm up and running and trying to figure out why wxGTK cannot find the installed gtk+2. What information can I provide? 'uname -a' reports: Linux salmo 2.6.27.7-smp #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:18:02 CST 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux. This particular system has run Slackware since September 2007 when it replaced my former server/workstation. I would like to get wxGTK and tinyerp-client built today so I can actually use the application this week. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rw at rlworkman.net Sun Feb 1 23:41:57 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:41:57 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> Message-ID: <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Rich: For future reference, if you're going to post to multiple lists, just CC them; that way, all responses can stay together, and responders won't suggest things that have already been suggested elsewhere... On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Chess Griffin wrote: > > > I can confirm that the wxGTK SlackBuild works fine on a full > > install of Slackware 12.2 -- I just did it today. :-) > > That's encouraging, Chess. I can confirm that wxGTK builds just fine here as well. > > Is this a full clean install of Slackware 12.2? If not, what is not > > installed? And if it's an upgrade, what did you upgrade from? > > It's a clean installation with data and other applications > restored from the backup tape. Based on the prior troubles you've had, I've noticed a common thread: all of them involved restoring stuff from a backup tape. This is going to come across a bit "asshole-ish," and I'll go ahead and apologize in advance for that, but... I think you need to reconsider the way you're doing things, as it's obviously not ideal. > I've had two weeks of the > server/workstation being down; this past week because it just would > not boot into any kernel I built. There was something in /etc that > was overwritten by an earlier file on the tape, apparently because > the mtime of the tape file was newer than that of the > freshly-installed file. Friday night and Saturday morning I carefully > did a file-by-file restore of /etc and the system now boots into the > 2.6.27.7-generic-smp kernel. When I redid the full install Friday > from the 12.2 distribution disks, I put everything from disks 1 and 2 > on, but only kdebase and kdelibs because I run Xfce, not KDE. > > The original attempt was an upgrade from a working 12.1 system to > 12.2. FWIW, a Slackware-experienced SysAdmin duplicated my problems > on a virtual machine on which he installed -12.2 (his servers are > still running -11.0), but his solution didn't apply to my situation. > > Regardless, I'm up and running and trying to figure out why wxGTK > cannot find the installed gtk+2. > > What information can I provide? 'uname -a' reports: Linux salmo > 2.6.27.7-smp #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:18:02 CST 2008 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) > 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux. This > particular system has run Slackware since September 2007 when it > replaced my former server/workstation. > > I would like to get wxGTK and tinyerp-client built today so I can > actually use the application this week. I can only suggest two things: 1) upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new *everything* 2) if (1) fails, clean install If (2) becomes necessary, DO NOT "restore" anything from a backup tape. Build what you need *on* the new system and install it there. If you find that you often need the same stuff on multiple systems (which seems to be the case), then either get a dedicated build box with a package set that's common to *all* of your other machines, build the stuff there, and save the packages somewhere for installation on the other systems. This will require you to keep all of your other machines with the same package list, but that shouldn't be a problem -- regardless of whether you actually *need* $somepackage on a particular system, it won't *hurt* anything by being installed, and you'll get to greatly simplify your administration burden. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 00:23:26 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:23:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > Based on the prior troubles you've had, I've noticed a common thread: all > of them involved restoring stuff from a backup tape. This is going to > come across a bit "asshole-ish," and I'll go ahead and apologize in > advance for that, but... I think you need to reconsider the way you're > doing things, as it's obviously not ideal. Robby, This has not been an issue from 8.0 through 11.0. Even the upgrades to 12.0 and 12.1 worked. So, if it's something I did on the upgrade to 12.2 then I really need to learn what is different. Over the years I have restored from the backup tapes several times (new hard drives, change from Red Hat-7.3 to Slackware-8.0) without any problems. How does restoring business applications from the backup tape affect building libraries from souce? Am I supposed to rebuild LyX, PostgreSQL, SQL-Ledger, and all the other applications I use for business because the underlying distribution has been upgraded? > I can only suggest two things: > 1) upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new *everything* On both machines I ran upgradepkg --install-new > 2) if (1) fails, clean install I've done the latter at least 5 times. > If (2) becomes necessary, DO NOT "restore" anything from a backup > tape. Sorry. I cannot kill my business by not having applications and data available. > If you find that you often need the same stuff on multiple systems > (which seems to be the case), then either get a dedicated build box > with a package set that's common to *all* of your other machines, build > the stuff there, and save the packages somewhere for installation on > the other systems. I've always upgraded my notebook first since it's not as critical as the desktop. The upgrade from 12.1 to 12.2 worked just fine on the notebook. I could not anticipate why it wouldn't work as smoothly on the desktop ... just as the prior upgrades went smoothly on both machines. And apologies for posting on both lists. Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 01:17:21 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:17:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > Based on the prior troubles you've had, I've noticed a common thread: all > of them involved restoring stuff from a backup tape. This is going to > come across a bit "asshole-ish," and I'll go ahead and apologize in > advance for that, but... I think you need to reconsider the way you're > doing things, as it's obviously not ideal. Robby, I apologize if my response came across as harsh. I did not mean to be abrupt. I've basicly spend the past two weeks trying to determine what broke in the -12.1 to -12.2 upgrade on my main machine. Even with the help of an experienced SysAdmin who's been running Slackware for years we could not figure out just what happened. During this time I got no business done, and for a self-employed consultant that's very expensive. While I'm not a computer professional like you and many others on this list (yes, you're a teacher, but spend a great deal of time learning linux and Slackware inside out). I use it as a tool, and have run my business on linux since mid-1997. I've also written code in FORTRAN, C, and now Python so I'm not naive about issues. That's why I'm so frustrated that the upgrade did not work as expected and that something in the /etc/ directory kept getting in the way of a running system. If, with help of gurus such as yourself, I can identify why some SlackBuild scripts bail out during the configure phase because they cannot find libraries that were installed during the clean -12.2 installation, I'll be well prepared in the future. I've found four such applications (tinyerp-client, taskjuggler, wxGTK, apcupsd), while I've successfully built 29 apps over the past couple of days from SlackBuild scripts. It would be very helpful to learn why those four fail. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 01:48:13 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:48:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: > When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: > > gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 I found one problem. When building tinyerp-client the configure phase fails for the same reason: cannot find gtk+2. So, I tried importing the module in interactive python (according to find it resides in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk), but apparently it didn't make it correctly: [rshepard at salmo ~]$ python Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 11 2008, 13:43:31) [GCC 4.2.4] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import gtk Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 48, in from gtk import _gtk ImportError: /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: undefined symbol: FT_Select_Size >>> Reinstalling the gtk+2 package didn't help. Wonder what's going on here ... it could well be my syntax. fontconfig-2.6.0-i486-2 is installed, and that's where libfontconfig.so.1 is found. If there is a more appropriate mail list to help me learn how to identify what broke and how to fix it, please point me there. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rw at rlworkman.net Mon Feb 2 02:04:44 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:04:44 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090201200444.67ad5775@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:23:26 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > How does restoring business applications from the backup tape > affect building libraries from souce? Am I supposed to rebuild LyX, > PostgreSQL, SQL-Ledger, and all the other applications I use for > business because the underlying distribution has been upgraded? Yes. While a app built on a 12.0 or 12.1 system will often still work on 12.2, there's no guarantee. I can think of *several* situations where this would have complications, but unless you *really* want to hear them, I'll spare the details (because I *really* don't want to type it all out). > > I can only suggest two things: > > 1) upgradepkg --reinstall --install-new *everything* > > On both machines I ran > upgradepkg --install-new > > > 2) if (1) fails, clean install > > I've done the latter at least 5 times. ...and yet the same or similar problems keep occurring. That's ultimately my point - I don't know what it is, but *something* you're doing is causing these problems. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From harmon at ksu.edu Mon Feb 2 02:11:23 2009 From: harmon at ksu.edu (Scott Harmon) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:11:23 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> On Feb 1, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: > >> When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: >> >> gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 > > I found one problem. When building tinyerp-client the configure phase > fails for the same reason: cannot find gtk+2. So, I tried importing > the > module in interactive python (according to find it resides in > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk), but apparently it > didn't make > it correctly: > > [rshepard at salmo ~]$ python > Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 11 2008, 13:43:31) [GCC 4.2.4] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>> import gtk > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", > line 48, > in > from gtk import _gtk > ImportError: /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: undefined symbol: > FT_Select_Size >>>> > > Reinstalling the gtk+2 package didn't help. Wonder what's going on > here > ... it could well be my syntax. > Did you restore /usr/local/{lib,bin}... ? > fontconfig-2.6.0-i486-2 is installed, and that's where > libfontconfig.so.1 > is found. > > If there is a more appropriate mail list to help me learn how to > identify > what broke and how to fix it, please point me there. > > Thanks, > > Rich > > -- > Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity > Credibility > Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation > Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: > 503-667-8863 > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > -- Scott J. Harmon PhD Candidate Kansas State University "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes." - Edsger Dijkstra From timp at timp.com.au Mon Feb 2 02:12:10 2009 From: timp at timp.com.au (Timothy Pollard) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:12:10 +1000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090202121210.329bc42f@shammah.timp.com.au> Hi Rich, On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:48:13 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: > > > When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: > > > > gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 > > I found one problem. When building tinyerp-client the configure phase > fails for the same reason: cannot find gtk+2. So, I tried importing the > module in interactive python (according to find it resides in > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk), but apparently it didn't make > it correctly: > > [rshepard at salmo ~]$ python > Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 11 2008, 13:43:31) [GCC 4.2.4] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> import gtk > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", line 48, > in > from gtk import _gtk > ImportError: /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: undefined symbol: FT_Select_Size > >>> > > Reinstalling the gtk+2 package didn't help. Wonder what's going on here > ... it could well be my syntax. > > fontconfig-2.6.0-i486-2 is installed, and that's where libfontconfig.so.1 > is found. > > If there is a more appropriate mail list to help me learn how to identify > what broke and how to fix it, please point me there. > A bit of a Google around notes this bug report in Debian: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org/msg525115.html which basically says that this is probably caused by libfreetype issues. The libfreetype.so.6 is contained in both the aaa_elflibs and libfreetype packages: $ grep libfreetype.so.6 /var/log/packages/* /var/log/packages/aaa_elflibs-12.2.0-i486-1:usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.18 /var/log/packages/freetype-2.3.7-i486-1:usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.18 So, your restoring a libfreetype from your backups, or maybe you've got an old version of one of those packages still lying around. I'd try doing a "$ locate libfreetype" and see what you get. -- TimP -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 02:18:43 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:18:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> References: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Scott Harmon wrote: > Did you restore /usr/local/{lib,bin}... ? Scott, Yes. The restore default is to not overwrite disk files with the same or newer mtimes. We suspect that somehow a file on tape had a newer time than the one on disk. I did not pick specific applications because I did not have a separate list of those. I can always re-install stock -12.2 apps that go in /usr/local/ if I can identify which ones do so. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 02:27:00 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:27:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> References: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Scott Harmon wrote: > Did you restore /usr/local/{lib,bin}... ? Good question, Scott! I find a lot of broken links in /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/lib that I'll fix right after dinner. I'll post results when I have some. Thanks again, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Mon Feb 2 02:34:17 2009 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090202 Message-ID: <200902012134.17974.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Mon Feb 2 01:42:33 UTC 2009 accessibility/unclutter: Added - unclutter is a tool designed to remove the clutter of a mouse pointer from a screen in use. Thanks to B. Watson. -rworkman audio/mp3splt: Updated for version 2.2.3. Thanks to Roberto Neri. audio/mp3splt-gtk: Updated for version 0.5.4. Thanks to Roberto Neri. development/autogen: Added - AutoGen is a tool designed to simplify the creation and maintenance of programs that contain large amounts of repetitious text. Thanks to Andrzej Telszewski. --rworkman development/bzr: Updated for version 1.11. Thanks to Robby Workman. --erik games/epsxe: Added - ePSXe (enhanced PSX emulator) is an emulator of the Sony PlayStation video game console. Thanks to "soyalexman" --rworkman games/gnubg: Updated for version 20090125. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman games/hatari: Added - Hatari is an Atari ST and STE emulator. Thanks to B. Watson. --rworkman games/hatari_tos_roms: Added - this contains TOS (Tramiel Operating System) ROM images for use with hatari. Thanks to B. Watson. --rworkman libraries/libmp3splt: Updated for version 0.5.4. Thanks to Roberto Neri. misc/clawsker: Updated for version 0.6.0. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman misc/cwiid: Added - CWiid is a collection of tools for interfacing with the Nintendo Wiimote. Thanks to B. Watson. --rworkman network/d4x: Added - d4x (Downloader for X) is a download manager/accelerator for X. Thanks to Larry Hajali. --rworkman network/elinks: Fixed some docs copying; thanks to Brian Muramatsu. --rworkman network/conntrack-tools: Updated for version 0.9.10. Thanks to Robby Workman. --erik network/ndiswrapper: Updated with the *real* upstream 1.54 release. Thanks to Robby Workman. --erik system/hdapsd: Updated for version 20090129, and included some additions and fixups to the config file and init script. If something is broken, blame me, as I tweaked it a bit :) Thanks to alkos333. --rworkman system/lbzip2: Updated for version 0.12. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman system/rdiff-backup: Updated for version 1.2.5. Thanks to javivf at alasombra.net and Paul Wisehart. --rworkman system/xbindkeys: Updated for version 1.8.3. Thanks to Erik Hanson. From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 02:34:51 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:34:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: <20090202121210.329bc42f@shammah.timp.com.au> References: <20090202121210.329bc42f@shammah.timp.com.au> Message-ID: On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Timothy Pollard wrote: > A bit of a Google around notes this bug report in Debian: > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist at lists.debian.org/msg525115.html > which basically says that this is probably caused by libfreetype issues. Timothy, I didn't catch that; thank you. > The libfreetype.so.6 is contained in both the aaa_elflibs and libfreetype > packages: > $ grep libfreetype.so.6 /var/log/packages/* > /var/log/packages/aaa_elflibs-12.2.0-i486-1:usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.18 > /var/log/packages/freetype-2.3.7-i486-1:usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6.3.18 > > So, your restoring a libfreetype from your backups, or maybe you've got an old > version of one of those packages still lying around. I'd try doing a "$ locate > libfreetype" and see what you get. Here's what I had: /usr/lib/libfreetype-6.3.18 and /usr/local/lib/6.3.8 from 2005, with soft links from Friday. I've removed the earlier versions and ran ldconfig. I'll fix the broken links before testing more. Many thanks for the pointer! Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rw at rlworkman.net Mon Feb 2 02:39:52 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:39:52 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090201203952.46f72eb0@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:48:13 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: > > > When I grep for gtk in /var/log/packages these are returned: > > > > gtk+2-2.12.12-i486-1 > > I found one problem. When building tinyerp-client the configure > phase fails for the same reason: cannot find gtk+2. So, I tried > importing the module in interactive python (according to find it > resides in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk), but > apparently it didn't make it correctly: > > [rshepard at salmo ~]$ python > Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Sep 11 2008, 13:43:31) > [GCC 4.2.4] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> import gtk > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py", > line 48, in > from gtk import _gtk > ImportError: /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: undefined symbol: > FT_Select_Size > >>> > > Reinstalling the gtk+2 package didn't help. Wonder what's going on > here ... it could well be my syntax. > > fontconfig-2.6.0-i486-2 is installed, and that's where > libfontconfig.so.1 is found. This is why you don't reinstall *applications* and such from backup tapes, at least when they were built on previous/different underlying operating systems. Looks like pygtk is expecting a different freetype library than what you have on the system, and if pygtk and freetype are the correct ones as installed with a 12.2 system, that can't happen. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rw at rlworkman.net Mon Feb 2 02:43:32 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:43:32 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> Message-ID: <20090201204332.1f025a90@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:18:43 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Scott Harmon wrote: > > > Did you restore /usr/local/{lib,bin}... ? > > Scott, > > Yes. The restore default is to not overwrite disk files with the > same or newer mtimes. We suspect that somehow a file on tape had a > newer time than the one on disk. I did not pick specific applications > because I did not have a separate list of those. > > I can always re-install stock -12.2 apps that go in /usr/local/ if > I can identify which ones do so. None. /usr/local is for *local* system-specific software compiled by the system admin and typically *not* packaged. > Good question, Scott! I find a lot of broken links > in /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/lib that I'll fix right after dinner. NO, NO, NO. /usr/local is where *applications* go. Don't restore them from backup if they were built on an older version of Slackware. Among the problems you'll encounter are missing and unresolved symbols in libraries. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 03:14:49 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:14:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [slackware] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: <20090201204332.1f025a90@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> <20090201204332.1f025a90@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > None. /usr/local is for *local* system-specific software compiled by > the system admin and typically *not* packaged. That's what I thought. And why I put applications there that are not part of the distribution. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From rw at rlworkman.net Mon Feb 2 03:27:50 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:27:50 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [slackware] Package Build Issues -- Update In-Reply-To: References: <77E52B8E-86C7-4148-A774-B91DD1D5AF49@ksu.edu> <20090201204332.1f025a90@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090201212750.4aa559f3@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:14:49 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > > > None. /usr/local is for *local* system-specific software compiled > > by the system admin and typically *not* packaged. > > That's what I thought. And why I put applications there that are > not part of the distribution. That's fine - exactly what you should do if you're installing them with "configure && make && make install" as opposed to packaging them first via a build script or otherwise. Again though, I have to reiterate -- DO NOT restore /usr/local from one Slackware version onto another version. Also, you mentioned a freetype or fontconfig (I don't recall which) version in one of your /usr/local directories in another mail; that should not be happening, as both of those are included with Slackware. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rw at rlworkman.net Mon Feb 2 03:37:21 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:37:21 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090201213721.5d6d050a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:17:21 -0800 (PST) Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > > > Based on the prior troubles you've had, I've noticed a common > > thread: all of them involved restoring stuff from a backup tape. > > This is going to come across a bit "asshole-ish," and I'll go ahead > > and apologize in advance for that, but... I think you need to > > reconsider the way you're doing things, as it's obviously not ideal. > > Robby, > > I apologize if my response came across as harsh. I did not mean to > be abrupt. > > I've basicly spend the past two weeks trying to determine what > broke in the -12.1 to -12.2 upgrade on my main machine. Even with the > help of an experienced SysAdmin who's been running Slackware for > years we could not figure out just what happened. During this time I > got no business done, and for a self-employed consultant that's very > expensive. I didn't take any offense to anything you said, but even if I had, there's no need to apologize to me - you're understandably under some stress because of all this, and so long as a person doesn't delve into personal attacks, I'll not get offended and/or hold grudges. The biggest concern I have is trying to get you to see that your backup and restore practice is a big part of the problem, and I just don't see a good way to do that without *me* being, or at least coming across as, harsh. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Mon Feb 2 04:06:17 2009 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:06:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- RESOLVED!! In-Reply-To: <20090201213721.5d6d050a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20090201223430.GA3293@localhost> <20090201174157.14fa53a5@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <20090201213721.5d6d050a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Robby Workman wrote: > I didn't take any offense to anything you said, but even if I had, there's > no need to apologize to me - you're understandably under some stress > because of all this, and so long as a person doesn't delve into personal > attacks, I'll not get offended and/or hold grudges. Thank you. > The biggest concern I have is trying to get you to see that your backup > and restore practice is a big part of the problem, and I just don't see a > good way to do that without *me* being, or at least coming across as, > harsh. This is the first time a Slackware upgrade caused me any problems at all. Totally unexpected. It turns out that the /usr/local/lib restore from the backup tape placed libfreetype-3.6.8 on the disk and that was in addition to the 3.6.18 installed with -12.2. As soon as I removed the earlier (vintage 2005) libraries, everything built with the SlackBuild scripts. The first 4 days the system was down I tried re-installing 12.1 (the distribution that worked), but there was still something broken because I could not get that working at all. It was Friday a week ago that my SysAdmin friend agreed that another 12.1 install was futile and I might as well go to 12.2. That booted with the huge kernel, but not the generic one. Then I carelessly deleted some files from /etc/ and restoring from tape into that directory was the cause of last week's problems. So I tried to restore to a clean 12.1 distribution installation, but it just refused to work. Now everything is stable, current, and working with the 2.6.27.7-generic-smp kernel and I can focus on my business for a while. I greatly appreciate the help all of you offered. When I saw the two library versions it brought back the memory of the same thing happening with early Red Hat distribution upgrades. But, that was so long ago I had totally forgotten about it. Again, a heartfelt thank you to all of you, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863 From pc_warner at yahoo.com Mon Feb 2 04:21:18 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:21:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: <20090201213721.5d6d050a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <393279.31046.qm@web57706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Rich, It might be a good idea to compile some of your software to use static libraries in the future. Maybe you can do that gradually over time. Also, something like GoboLinux (www.gobolinux.org/) may be of interest to you. --phillip From pc_warner at yahoo.com Mon Feb 2 05:37:16 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:37:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues In-Reply-To: <393279.31046.qm@web57706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <957713.48335.qm@web57704.mail.re3.yahoo.com> --- On Sun, 2/1/09, Phillip Warner wrote: > Also, something like GoboLinux (www.gobolinux.org/) may be > of interest to you. or this project to 'Convert Slackware packages into relocatable "AppDirs"' listed at LQ at http://tinyurl.com/b3lbf7 --phillip From banderols at gmail.com Mon Feb 2 17:59:21 2009 From: banderols at gmail.com (Murat D. Kadirov) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:59:21 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't upload slackbuilds Message-ID: <20090202175921.GA6896@darkstar> I can't upload my updated slackbuilds. I get error: "Upload failed, could not find: hostapd/hostapd.info". But: murat at laptop[~]$ less hostapd.tar.gz drwxr-xr-x murat/users 0 2009-02-02 22:15 hostapd/ -rw-r--r-- murat/users 2569 2009-02-02 21:50 hostapd/config -rw-r--r-- murat/users 907 2008-08-10 10:10 hostapd/slack-desc -rw-r--r-- murat/users 597 2009-01-29 23:15 hostapd/README -rw-r--r-- murat/users 246 2009-01-29 23:24 hostapd/hostapd.info -rwxr-xr-x murat/users 3255 2009-01-30 02:32 hostapd/hostapd.SlackBuild -rw-r--r-- murat/users 653 2009-01-30 02:31 hostapd/doinst.sh -rw-r--r-- murat/users 730 2009-01-30 01:01 hostapd/rc.hostapd.new p.s. I can't upload slackbuild "John the Ripper" (size 136 kb) too. Robby, can I email it to you again? :) -- Murat D. Kadirov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From erik at slackbuilds.org Mon Feb 2 19:18:26 2009 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:18:26 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't upload slackbuilds In-Reply-To: <20090202175921.GA6896@darkstar> References: <20090202175921.GA6896@darkstar> Message-ID: <20090202131826.3403e68b@shaggy.scooby> On Feb 02, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Murat D. Kadirov wrote: > I can't upload my updated slackbuilds. I get error: "Upload failed, > could not find: hostapd/hostapd.info". But: It doesn't look like it should have failed.. I just cleaned out our tmp dir so give it another try. be sure to tar zcvf hostapd.tar.gz hostapd/ If that fails I will take a closer look. -- Erik Hanson http://slackbuilds.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From banderols at gmail.com Mon Feb 2 20:16:41 2009 From: banderols at gmail.com (Murat D. Kadirov) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:16:41 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't upload slackbuilds In-Reply-To: <20090202131826.3403e68b@shaggy.scooby> References: <20090202175921.GA6896@darkstar> <20090202131826.3403e68b@shaggy.scooby> Message-ID: <20090202201641.GA7090@darkstar> 13:18 Mon 02 Feb, Erik Hanson wrote: > On Feb 02, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Murat D. Kadirov wrote: > > > I can't upload my updated slackbuilds. I get error: "Upload failed, > > could not find: hostapd/hostapd.info". But: > > It doesn't look like it should have failed.. I just cleaned out our tmp dir > so give it another try. be sure to tar zcvf hostapd.tar.gz hostapd/ Thanks, now it work. -- Murat D. Kadirov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From xma at gnu.org Mon Feb 2 19:01:14 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (xma at gnu.org) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:01:14 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] awesome 3.1.1 ? Message-ID: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, I tried to modify sbo awesome slackbuild script but it miserably failed due to missing symbols in the cairo library shipped with default slackware distribution. To correctly build awesome3, we need cairo compiled with XCB backend. I know how to build it but I want to know how I can update awesome3 in SBo (knowing that without xcb-aware cairo library) won't work. Regards -- Xavier Maillard From chess at chessgriffin.com Mon Feb 2 21:26:14 2009 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] awesome 3.1.1 ? In-Reply-To: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> References: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Message-ID: <20090202212614.GA16445@localhost> * xma at gnu.org [2009-02-02 20:01:14]: > Hi, > > I tried to modify sbo awesome slackbuild script but it miserably > failed due to missing symbols in the cairo library shipped with > default slackware distribution. > > To correctly build awesome3, we need cairo compiled with XCB > backend. I know how to build it but I want to know how I can > update awesome3 in SBo (knowing that without xcb-aware cairo > library) won't work. > As the maintainer of the awesome SlackBuild I have not investigated this and do not plan to (and do not plan to update the awesome SlackBuild) because of all the changes between awesome2 and awesome3. You probably know this, but awesome3 is completely different than awesome2. Awesome3 is based on lua, has a completely different configuration file, and, as you discovered, different dependencies (some of which cannot be satisfied without replacing stock Slackware packages which I will not do on my systems). If you or someone else wants to create and submit an awesome3 SlackBuild to SBo that would cool -- I imagine the SBo admins would be OK with keeping both in the repo since they are really very different applications, but since I am not an admin that's not my call. I would support adding awesome3, FWIW since you are not the first to ask about this -- search the ML archives. Anyway, the way to adapt the current awesome2 SlackBuild is the same as any -- figure out what needs to be changed and change it. Get the source, and unpack it. Run ./configure --help and see what options are available. Edit the SlackBuild as needed. Edit the .info file as needed. You may want to read some of the information on slackbuilds.org about creating SlackBuild scripts since that's basically what you would be doing, only with a template that is more complete than the basic SBo template. -- Chess Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Mon Feb 2 21:27:56 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:27:56 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] awesome 3.1.1 ? In-Reply-To: <20090202212614.GA16445@localhost> References: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> <20090202212614.GA16445@localhost> Message-ID: <20090202152756.386eb1c6@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:26:14 -0500 Chess Griffin wrote: > As the maintainer of the awesome SlackBuild I have not investigated > this and do not plan to (and do not plan to update the awesome > SlackBuild) because of all the changes between awesome2 and > awesome3. You probably know this, but awesome3 is completely > different than awesome2. Awesome3 is based on lua, has a completely > different configuration file, and, as you discovered, different > dependencies (some of which cannot be satisfied without replacing > stock Slackware packages which I will not do on my systems). and for this reason, an awesome3 build script is not welcome at this time. Maybe for the next Slackware release, which should (assuming gtk+2 and friends are updated) have a newer cairo version. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chess at chessgriffin.com Mon Feb 2 22:28:19 2009 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] awesome 3.1.1 ? In-Reply-To: <20090202152756.386eb1c6@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> <20090202212614.GA16445@localhost> <20090202152756.386eb1c6@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090202222819.GB18207@localhost> * Robby Workman [2009-02-02 15:27:56]: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:26:14 -0500 > Chess Griffin wrote: > > > As the maintainer of the awesome SlackBuild I have not investigated > > this and do not plan to (and do not plan to update the awesome > > SlackBuild) because of all the changes between awesome2 and > > awesome3. You probably know this, but awesome3 is completely > > different than awesome2. Awesome3 is based on lua, has a completely > > different configuration file, and, as you discovered, different > > dependencies (some of which cannot be satisfied without replacing > > stock Slackware packages which I will not do on my systems). > > > and for this reason, an awesome3 build script is not welcome at this > time. Maybe for the next Slackware release, which should (assuming > gtk+2 and friends are updated) have a newer cairo version. > Makes sense, of course. Still the OP can modify the SlackBuild for his personal use in the meantime and then have it ready to go if/when those changes are made in Slackware proper. And to the OP, sorry if I seemed gruff. I'm just annoyed that awesome3 made all those changes when IMHO, awesome2 was pretty darn awesome. Using a deprecated window manager (that I like) sucks. Having said that, there is an update to awesome2 (2.3.5) that I will submit soon. One last tidbit for the OP - did you see this in the awesome wiki: http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/index.php?title=Awesome-3-Slackware I think that has the answers you are seeking. :-) -- Chess Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk Tue Feb 3 10:27:15 2009 From: mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk (Morten Juhl-Johansen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Z=F6lde-Fej=E9r?=) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:27:15 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild RSS Message-ID: <20090203112715.23063cf3@espero.syntaktisk.dk> Just curious: Is there an RSS feed of newly added/updated Slackbuilds? Yours, Morten __ Morten Juhl-Johansen Z?lde-Fej?r http://syntaktisk.dk * mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk From mark-sbo at markwalling.org Tue Feb 3 11:39:09 2009 From: mark-sbo at markwalling.org (Mark Walling) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild RSS In-Reply-To: <20090203112715.23063cf3@espero.syntaktisk.dk> References: <20090203112715.23063cf3@espero.syntaktisk.dk> Message-ID: <20090203113909.GA9378@you> On 02/03/09, Morten Juhl-Johansen Z?lde-Fej?r wrote: > Just curious: > Is there an RSS feed of newly added/updated Slackbuilds? > > Yours, > Morten http://slackbuilds.org/rss/ChangeLog.rss Linked from the footer of every page. -- Mark http://markwalling.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk Tue Feb 3 12:09:06 2009 From: mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk (Morten Juhl-Johansen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Z=F6lde-Fej=E9r?=) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:09:06 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuild RSS In-Reply-To: <20090203113909.GA9378@you> References: <20090203112715.23063cf3@espero.syntaktisk.dk> <20090203113909.GA9378@you> Message-ID: <20090203130906.4eed4742@espero.syntaktisk.dk> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:39:09 -0500 Mark Walling wrote: > On 02/03/09, Morten Juhl-Johansen Z?lde-Fej?r wrote: > > Just curious: > > Is there an RSS feed of newly added/updated Slackbuilds? > > > > Yours, > > Morten > http://slackbuilds.org/rss/ChangeLog.rss > > Linked from the footer of every page. > Wow, that was exceptionally unimpressive of me. It seems I have become a little too used to Firefox picking it up automagically. Thank you! Yours. Morten __ Morten Juhl-Johansen Z?lde-Fej?r http://syntaktisk.dk * mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk From larryhaja at gmail.com Tue Feb 3 20:44:56 2009 From: larryhaja at gmail.com (Larry Hajali) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:44:56 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libmusicbrainz version number mismatch Message-ID: <8ba30f850902031244s252dd7c0x8e90e9c5e46226ba@mail.gmail.com> I noticed that the there is a mismatch in version numbers for libmusicbrainz. On the webpage and inside the libmusicbrainz.info file it says "3.0.2", however, all other version numbers including the libmusicbrainz download link point to "2.1.5". Larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 3 21:26:46 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:26:46 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libmusicbrainz version number mismatch In-Reply-To: <8ba30f850902031244s252dd7c0x8e90e9c5e46226ba@mail.gmail.com> References: <8ba30f850902031244s252dd7c0x8e90e9c5e46226ba@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090203152646.31d7e940@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:44:56 -0800 Larry Hajali wrote: > I noticed that the there is a mismatch in version numbers for > libmusicbrainz. On the webpage and inside the libmusicbrainz.info > file it says "3.0.2", however, all other version numbers including the > libmusicbrainz download link point to "2.1.5". Fixed; thanks! -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From larryhaja at gmail.com Wed Feb 4 16:21:08 2009 From: larryhaja at gmail.com (Larry Hajali) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:21:08 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Deluge Message-ID: <8ba30f850902040821v1965be34pd988dae291d497d8@mail.gmail.com> There are two entries for Deluge on slackbuilds.org as well as links to two versions of the program. Version 1.0.7 and 1.1.0. Larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 4 16:31:24 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:31:24 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Deluge In-Reply-To: <8ba30f850902040821v1965be34pd988dae291d497d8@mail.gmail.com> References: <8ba30f850902040821v1965be34pd988dae291d497d8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090204103124.246a1c6a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:21:08 -0800 Larry Hajali wrote: > There are two entries for Deluge on slackbuilds.org as well as links > to two versions of the program. Version 1.0.7 and 1.1.0. Not anymore :-) Thanks... -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From michiel at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 4 16:32:29 2009 From: michiel at slackbuilds.org (Michiel van Wessem) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:32:29 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Deluge In-Reply-To: <8ba30f850902040821v1965be34pd988dae291d497d8@mail.gmail.com> References: <8ba30f850902040821v1965be34pd988dae291d497d8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200902041632.33535.michiel@slackbuilds.org> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 16:21:08 Larry Hajali wrote: > There are two entries for Deluge on slackbuilds.org as well as links to two > versions of the program. Version 1.0.7 and 1.1.0. > Fixed. Thanks. -M -- http://slackbuilds.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From xma at gnu.org Wed Feb 4 23:31:41 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (xma at gnu.org) Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:31:41 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] awesome 3.1.1 ? In-Reply-To: <20090202222819.GB18207@localhost> References: <22286.1233601274@zogzog.maillard.mobi> <20090202212614.GA16445@localhost> <20090202152756.386eb1c6@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <20090202222819.GB18207@localhost> Message-ID: <16802.1233790301@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, Chess Griffin wrote: > * Robby Workman [2009-02-02 15:27:56]: > > > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:26:14 -0500 > > Chess Griffin wrote: > > > > > As the maintainer of the awesome SlackBuild I have not investigated > > > this and do not plan to (and do not plan to update the awesome > > > SlackBuild) because of all the changes between awesome2 and > > > awesome3. You probably know this, but awesome3 is completely > > > different than awesome2. Awesome3 is based on lua, has a completely > > > different configuration file, and, as you discovered, different > > > dependencies (some of which cannot be satisfied without replacing > > > stock Slackware packages which I will not do on my systems). Here my "modified cairo installation" does not replace the stock cairo since I installed it in /usr/local which awesome was kind to use as the prefered cairo library :) > > and for this reason, an awesome3 build script is not welcome at this > > time. Maybe for the next Slackware release, which should (assuming > > gtk+2 and friends are updated) have a newer cairo version. > > > Makes sense, of course. Still the OP can modify the SlackBuild for his > personal use in the meantime and then have it ready to go if/when those > changes are made in Slackware proper. If ever made :) > And to the OP, sorry if I seemed gruff. I'm just annoyed that awesome3 > made all those changes when IMHO, awesome2 was pretty darn awesome. > Using a deprecated window manager (that I like) sucks. Having said > that, there is an update to awesome2 (2.3.5) that I will submit soon. > > One last tidbit for the OP - did you see this in the awesome wiki: > > http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/index.php?title=Awesome-3-Slackware Checked it and I only needed to make my own slackbuild for cairo with xcb support. It works like a charm. > I think that has the answers you are seeking. :-) Yup. Thank you all for your time and support. From joesplace100 at hotmail.com Fri Feb 6 01:16:39 2009 From: joesplace100 at hotmail.com (Joe S) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:16:39 -0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Problem with nvidia-legacy173 slackbuild Message-ID: I installed the nvidia-legacy173 series from slackbuilds.org. When I try to run startx I get the following message: The nvidia kernel module has version 71.86.06, but the nvidia driver component has version 173.14.12 I can't get graphics. This is the output from lspci: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1) I used the slackbuild for the nvidia-legacy71 and it works OK for the GeForce FX 5500 According to the nvidia website the 173 series should be the one to work for this card. This slackbuild also works for the following card which it is supposed to work for: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV6 [Vanta/Vanta LT] (rev 15) Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live Messenger. Multitasking at its finest. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/messenger.aspx -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cnguyenminhtan at free.fr Fri Feb 6 10:05:53 2009 From: cnguyenminhtan at free.fr (cnguyenminhtan at free.fr) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:05:53 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Problem with nvidia-legacy173 slackbuild In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1992449762.199361233914753368.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> Hello, I'm not sure if I understand the steps you took but you need to build both the kernel module and the driver using the slackbuilds from the same Nvidia series. So if the card is supported by the 173 series, you need to use following slackbuilds: nvidia-legacy173-kernel nvidia-legacy173-driver If seems that you have used the slackbuilds: nvidia-legacy71-kernel nvidia-legacy173-driver did I understand correctly? KR, Christophe ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Joe S" ?: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org Envoy?: Vendredi 6 F?vrier 2009 02:16:39 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: [Slackbuilds-users] Problem with nvidia-legacy173 slackbuild I installed the nvidia-legacy173 series from slackbuilds.org. When I try to run startx I get the following message: The nvidia kernel module has version 71.86.06, but the nvidia driver component has version 173.14.12 I can't get graphics. This is the output from lspci: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5500] (rev a1) I used the slackbuild for the nvidia-legacy71 and it works OK for the GeForce FX 5500 According to the nvidia website the 173 series should be the one to work for this card. This slackbuild also works for the following card which it is supposed to work for: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV6 [Vanta/Vanta LT] (rev 15) Thanks. Windows Live Messenger. Multitasking at its finest. _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sat Feb 7 15:12:20 2009 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090207 Message-ID: <200902071012.20555.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Sat Feb 7 14:13:24 UTC 2009 desktop/QtCurve-Gtk2: Updated for version 0.60.0. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --rworkman desktop/QtCurve-KDE3: Updated for version 0.60.0. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --rworkman desktop/SystemPreferences: Added - System Preferences is a clone of the Apple OS X System Preferences application for GNUstep. Thanks to Stefan Bidigaray. --rworkman desktop/gtk-nodoka-engine: Added - Nodoka is the new Fedora default theme for Gnome. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman development/Amaya: Updated for version 11.0. Thanks to Kai Schreyer. --dsomero development/ProjectCenter: Added - ProjectCenter is GNUstep's integrated development environment. Thanks to Stefan Bidigaray. --rworkman development/acpica: Updated for version 20090123. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --dsomero development/gorm: Added - Gorm is the GNUstep counterpart to NeXT's Interface Builder. Thanks to Stefan Bidigaray. --rworkman development/psyco: Added - Psyco is a Python extension module which can massively speed up the execution of any Python code. Thanks to xroberx. --rworkman development/rarian: Added - Rarian is a documentation metadata library and a drop in replacement for scrollkeeper. Thanks to Andrzej Telszewsk. --dsomero games/einstein: Added - Einstein puzzle is a remake of the old DOS game Sherlock, which was inspired by Albert Einstein's puzzle. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman games/fortune_firefly: Added - fortune_firefly is fortunes from the TV series "Firefly". Thanks to B. Watson. --dsomero games/tmw: Updated for version 0.0.28. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero games/tmwmusic: Added - tmwmusic is add-on music for The Mana World. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero games/wesnoth: Updated for version 1.4.7. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --rworkman graphics/plotutils: Added - plotutils includes libplot (a function to export graphics to various formats) and some command line programs for plotting scientific data. Thanks to Luis Henrique. --rworkman graphics/tesseract: Updated for version 2.03 with some script cleanup. Thanks to Pierre Cazenave. --rworkman libraries/icu4c: Updated for version 4.0.1. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman misc/gramps: Added - GRAMPS is a genealogy program for Linux and other UNIX-like systems. Thanks to Bill Kirkpatrick. --dsomero misc/heyu: Added - heyu operates an X10 module via a CM11A computer interface. Thanks to B. Watson. --rworkman multimedia/GoogleEarth: Updated for version 5.0.11337.1968. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --rworkman network/airoscript: Added - Airoscript is a companion tool for aircrack-ng. Thanks to Larry Hajali. --dsomero network/naim: Added - naim is a console client for AIM, ICQ, IRC, and Lily CMC. Thanks to "Nai" --rworkman office/broffice.org: Updated for version 3.0.1. Thanks to Eduarda Oda. --rworkman office/homebank: Updated for version 4.0.2. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero system/sleuthkit: Updated for version 3.0.1. Thanks to Barry J. Grundy. --dsomero system/virtualbox-kernel: Updated for version 2.1.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman system/virtualbox-kernel-addons: Updated for version 2.1.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman system/virtualbox-ose: Updated for version 2.1.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman system/virtualbox-ose-addons: Updated for version 2.1.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman From xma at gnu.org Sat Feb 7 23:10:32 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (xma at gnu.org) Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:10:32 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] gmusicbrowser slackbuild update Message-ID: <8612.1234048232@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, I just uploaded (via upload form) the updated slackbuild script for gmusicbrowser 1.0.1. I only changed MD5SUM and version references. Regards -- Xavier Maillard From pprkut at liwjatan.at Mon Feb 9 19:54:31 2009 From: pprkut at liwjatan.at (Heinz Wiesinger) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:54:31 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] desmume problems with nvidia-driver Message-ID: <200902092054.37119.pprkut@liwjatan.at> Hi! I just found out that desmume does not compile on systems where nvidia-driver is installed. There's currently no note about this in the README. I found some information about this here: http://forums.desmume.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3175 What users affected by this would need to do is: nvidia-switch --xorg ./desmume.SlackBuild nvidia-switch --nvidia Can something like this be added to the README? Grs, Heinz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From larryhaja at gmail.com Mon Feb 9 23:04:34 2009 From: larryhaja at gmail.com (Larry Hajali) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:04:34 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] desmume problems with nvidia-driver In-Reply-To: <200902092054.37119.pprkut@liwjatan.at> References: <200902092054.37119.pprkut@liwjatan.at> Message-ID: <8ba30f850902091504s4fcf7e62y10da23075b3d176c@mail.gmail.com> Hello Heinz, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'm the SBo maintainer of desmume. I was unaware of this problem as I don't have an Nvidia card. I read the forum post you linked too and I see your suggestion is similar to the one Ice posted near the end. The file in question from the post "OGLRender.cpp" that seems to be causing this has been updated many times in the subversion directory since version 0.9 was released. None of the changes say that it addresses Nvidia drivers. There is, however, a new version on sourceforge that was released yestereday. I've successfully compiled the 0.9.1 version on a "non-vanilla" Slackware 12.2 w/ATI drivers and a "vanilla" Slackware 12.2 by just changing the version number in the slackbuild. This doesn't rectify the issue as I don't have an Nvidia card to test it on. But it would be great if you could test out the new release and see if it compiles on your system with Nvidia drivers? The new source package can be downloaded from here: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/desmume/desmume-0.9.1.tar.gz I will try to play around with it over the next couple of days and see if I can find a computer with Nvidia drivers so I can reproduce the error. Can you give me more information about your system? eg. Nvidia Driver version? is the driver compiled from a slackbuild from slackbuilds.org? Any other relevant information? If nothing has changed since the new release then I will update the slackbuild with the new version number and the appropriate information in the README. Or any other suggestions that slackbuilds.org members would recommend. Thanks, Larry On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Heinz Wiesinger wrote: > Hi! > > I just found out that desmume does not compile on systems where > nvidia-driver > is installed. There's currently no note about this in the README. > I found some information about this here: > http://forums.desmume.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3175 > What users affected by this would need to do is: > > nvidia-switch --xorg > ./desmume.SlackBuild > nvidia-switch --nvidia > > Can something like this be added to the README? > > Grs, > Heinz > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pprkut at liwjatan.at Tue Feb 10 11:22:47 2009 From: pprkut at liwjatan.at (Heinz Wiesinger) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:22:47 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] desmume problems with nvidia-driver In-Reply-To: <8ba30f850902091504s4fcf7e62y10da23075b3d176c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200902092054.37119.pprkut@liwjatan.at> <8ba30f850902091504s4fcf7e62y10da23075b3d176c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200902101222.51601.pprkut@liwjatan.at> Larry Hajali wrote: > Hello Heinz, > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'm the SBo maintainer of > desmume. > > I was unaware of this problem as I don't have an Nvidia card. I read the > forum post you linked too and I see your suggestion is similar to the one > Ice posted near the end. The file in question from the post > "OGLRender.cpp" that seems to be causing this has been updated many times > in the subversion directory since version 0.9 was released. None of the > changes say that it addresses Nvidia drivers. There is, however, a new > version on sourceforge that was released yestereday. I've successfully > compiled the 0.9.1 version on a "non-vanilla" Slackware 12.2 w/ATI drivers > and a "vanilla" Slackware 12.2 by just changing the version number in the > slackbuild. This doesn't rectify the issue as I don't have an Nvidia card > to test it on. But it would be great if you could test out the new release > and see if it compiles on your system with Nvidia drivers? The new source > package can be downloaded from here: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/desmume/desmume-0.9.1.tar.gz Tried it, still the same. No successful build with nvidia-driver active. > I will try to play around with it over the next couple of days and see if I > can find a computer with Nvidia drivers so I can reproduce the error. Can > you give me more information about your system? eg. Nvidia Driver version? > is the driver compiled from a slackbuild from slackbuilds.org? Any other > relevant information? You actually do not need to have nvidia-driver installed to reproduce the problem. It seems as if having nvidia's headers is enough. I put a tarball of them up on my server (http://www.liwjatan.at/files/src/nvidia-headers.tar.gz). You just have to replace the system headers with those and run the SlackBuild. (backup the original ones!) > If nothing has changed since the new release then I will update the > slackbuild with the new version number and the appropriate information in > the README. Or any other suggestions that slackbuilds.org members would > recommend. Thanks! Grs, Heinz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From larryhaja at gmail.com Tue Feb 10 18:21:37 2009 From: larryhaja at gmail.com (Larry Hajali) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:21:37 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] desmume problems with nvidia-driver In-Reply-To: <200902101222.51601.pprkut@liwjatan.at> References: <200902092054.37119.pprkut@liwjatan.at> <8ba30f850902091504s4fcf7e62y10da23075b3d176c@mail.gmail.com> <200902101222.51601.pprkut@liwjatan.at> Message-ID: <8ba30f850902101021t5864dea8i3025c1e12c4a31b1@mail.gmail.com> > > Tried it, still the same. No successful build with nvidia-driver active. > Yes, I tried it as well with same results. Using the nvidia-switch --xorg fixed the issue. > You actually do not need to have nvidia-driver installed to reproduce the > problem. It seems as if having nvidia's headers is enough. I put a tarball > of > them up on my server > (http://www.liwjatan.at/files/src/nvidia-headers.tar.gz). > You just have to replace the system headers with those and run the > SlackBuild. > (backup the original ones!) > I'll submit a new version update with a note about Nvidia drivers in the README. Thanks, Larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From me at alkos333.net Tue Feb 10 18:55:17 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:55:17 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile Message-ID: there's not such folder created as $PKG/usr/share/man anymore apparently. That manpage fix appaars to be obsolete -- Doug Larson - "Instead of giving a politician the keys to the city, it might be better to change the locks." From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 10 19:16:00 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:16:00 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:55:17 -0600 alkos333 wrote: > there's not such folder created as $PKG/usr/share/man anymore > apparently. That manpage fix appaars to be obsolete We've got this handled and ready to push out; it's just a matter of someone finding time to do the push now... -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at alkos333.net Tue Feb 10 19:21:53 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:21:53 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Robby Workman wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:55:17 -0600 > alkos333 wrote: > >> there's not such folder created as $PKG/usr/share/man anymore >> apparently. That manpage fix appaars to be obsolete > > > We've got this handled and ready to push out; it's just a matter of > someone finding time to do the push now... > > -RW > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > Robby, could you bump it up to 83 as well? I just compiled it and no other modifications are required really. Thanks, Alex -- Marlene Dietrich - "Most women set out to try to change a man, and when they have changed him they do not like h... From me at alkos333.net Tue Feb 10 19:27:48 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:27:48 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: References: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:21 PM, alkos333 wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Robby Workman wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:55:17 -0600 >> alkos333 wrote: >> >>> there's not such folder created as $PKG/usr/share/man anymore >>> apparently. That manpage fix appaars to be obsolete >> >> >> We've got this handled and ready to push out; it's just a matter of >> someone finding time to do the push now... >> >> -RW >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SlackBuilds-users mailing list >> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org >> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users >> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ >> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ >> >> >> > > Robby, > > could you bump it up to 83 as well? I just compiled it and no other > modifications are required really. > > > Thanks, > Alex > > > -- > > Marlene Dietrich - "Most women set out to try to change a man, and > when they have changed him they do not like h... > Also, kvm's README says to do "/etc/rc.d/rc.udev reload," but I get the following: root at tpt60:/etc/rc.d# /etc/rc.d/rc.udev reload Reloading udev rules udevadm control commands requires the -- format, this will stop working in a future release It looks like rc.udev needs modification. -- Marlene Dietrich - "Most women set out to try to change a man, and when they have changed him they do not like h... From nille.kungen at gmail.com Tue Feb 10 19:45:46 2009 From: nille.kungen at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Niklas_=27Nille=27_=C5kerstr=F6m?=) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:45:46 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: References: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <4991D96A.40209@gmail.com> alkos333 wrote: > Also, > > kvm's README says to do "/etc/rc.d/rc.udev reload," but I get the following: > > > > root at tpt60:/etc/rc.d# /etc/rc.d/rc.udev reload > Reloading udev rules > udevadm control commands requires the -- format, this will > stop working in a future release > > > It looks like rc.udev needs modification I sent pat an patch for that after the 12.2 release. (2008-12-25) But i might need to send it again. From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 10 21:03:25 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:03:25 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: References: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090210150325.7577331f@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:21:53 -0600 alkos333 wrote: > Robby, > > could you bump it up to 83 as well? I just compiled it and no other > modifications are required really. It's already at 83 in READY. :) -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 10 21:08:44 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:08:44 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] kvm 78 doesn't compile In-Reply-To: References: <20090210131600.64f3e766@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <20090210150844.0bb027b2@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:27:48 -0600 alkos333 wrote: > root at tpt60:/etc/rc.d# /etc/rc.d/rc.udev reload > Reloading udev rules > udevadm control commands requires the -- format, this will > stop working in a future release > > It looks like rc.udev needs modification. I've got this addressed in my staging tree, along with some other udev changes. Thanks for the reminder. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chess at chessgriffin.com Wed Feb 11 01:13:01 2009 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root Message-ID: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but I want to get as much feedback as possible. Currently, sbopkg can be run by root or a non-root user. Certain functions or features can only be done by a root user, of course, like building and installing packages. However, trying to maintain this dual permission standard is becoming very problematic. More than once I have considered removing the 'user-mode' from sbopkg, move sbopkg to /usr/sbin, and require sbopkg be run only by the root user, like pkgtool, slackpkg, and other similar tools require. Several unrelated issues have brought this to the forefront again and I am now very much leaning towards making this change. So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about keeping the ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks adapt to using sbopkg only as root? Feel free to respond on the list or privately. Thank you in advance for your feedback. -- Chess Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From me at alkos333.net Wed Feb 11 01:26:48 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:26:48 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Chess Griffin wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but > I want to get as much feedback as possible. > > Currently, sbopkg can be run by root or a non-root user. Certain > functions or features can only be done by a root user, of course, like > building and installing packages. However, trying to maintain this dual > permission standard is becoming very problematic. More than once I have > considered removing the 'user-mode' from sbopkg, move sbopkg to > /usr/sbin, and require sbopkg be run only by the root user, like > pkgtool, slackpkg, and other similar tools require. Several unrelated > issues have brought this to the forefront again and I am now very much > leaning towards making this change. > > So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about keeping the > ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks adapt to using > sbopkg only as root? > > Feel free to respond on the list or privately. > > Thank you in advance for your feedback. > root only - keep the code simple From ricardsonwilliams at gmail.com Wed Feb 11 01:55:58 2009 From: ricardsonwilliams at gmail.com (Ricardson Williams) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:55:58 +0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: <5eb6ff2c0902101755i352d1862t3fd25dcbf3e75481@mail.gmail.com> I use only by root.... On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:26 AM, alkos333 wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Chess Griffin > wrote: > > Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but > > I want to get as much feedback as possible. > > > > Currently, sbopkg can be run by root or a non-root user. Certain > > functions or features can only be done by a root user, of course, like > > building and installing packages. However, trying to maintain this dual > > permission standard is becoming very problematic. More than once I have > > considered removing the 'user-mode' from sbopkg, move sbopkg to > > /usr/sbin, and require sbopkg be run only by the root user, like > > pkgtool, slackpkg, and other similar tools require. Several unrelated > > issues have brought this to the forefront again and I am now very much > > leaning towards making this change. > > > > So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about keeping the > > ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks adapt to using > > sbopkg only as root? > > > > Feel free to respond on the list or privately. > > > > Thank you in advance for your feedback. > > > > root only - keep the code simple > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -- [], Ricardson Williams -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pc_warner at yahoo.com Wed Feb 11 02:59:20 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:59:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: <555619.37204.qm@web57708.mail.re3.yahoo.com> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Chess Griffin wrote: > So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about > keeping the > ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks > adapt to using > sbopkg only as root? ROOT-only sounds fine to me. The main use of a non-root user for me would be for testing SlackBuilds, and I don't have to use sbopkg for this (though root could drop perms as mentioned in a feature request). Non-root users really only need to view the Changelog and search/browse the repo. Non-admins could just use links/lynx on SBo if they need this from their console ;) --phillip From mannyslack at ver.megared.net.mx Wed Feb 11 03:33:53 2009 From: mannyslack at ver.megared.net.mx (mannyslack) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:33:53 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: <49924721.8060601@ver.megared.net.mx> Chess Griffin wrote: > ..Could folks adapt to using > sbopkg only as root? > Yes, root only sounds good. Greetings :) From chris.abela at maltats.com Wed Feb 11 08:33:08 2009 From: chris.abela at maltats.com (Chris Abela) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:33:08 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] rc-script permissions Message-ID: Further to a discussion that ensued on a linuxquestions.org thread: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/virtualbox-2.1.2-slackb uild-699309/ I noted that the permissions on rc-scripts installed by Slackbuild packages are not consistent. Moreover the default permissions are not documented by the specific slackbuilds README files. A solution might be one of the following: 1. Specify the default permissions on rc-scripts for all slackbuilds (say 7xx) 2. Specify that README files shall declare the default rc-scripts permissions. 3. Warn users that there are no rules in this regard and they should check them out themselves (if they exist). Chris From mauro.giachero at gmail.com Wed Feb 11 09:38:42 2009 From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:38:42 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [sbopkg-discuss] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: I also think that user-mode support should be tossed. -- Mauro Giachero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Wed Feb 11 10:39:15 2009 From: serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de (Serban Udrea) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:39:15 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> Message-ID: <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Chess Griffin wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post to sbopkg and slackbuilds.org mailing lists but > I want to get as much feedback as possible. > Hello! I dare to disagree with other posters. I actually do not understand why anything else but installing the final package needs root rights. I am (still) working on some packages I hope to submit soon and I do everything but package installation/removal as a normal user without problems. Thus I would actually drop root for anything but final installation/removal. In my opinion it is always good to use root rights as sparingly as possible. I do not know how big a problem is to change sbopkg, such that just the last step needs root rights, but I would say that a first change would be to have sbopkg default directories with access rights like /tmp. Another possibility would be to have a sbopkg group and just users belonging to this group would be allowed to use sbopkg, which may be achieved by the default access rights to sbopkg's directories. Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have chown -R root:root . which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine). At the moment I use chown -R $UID:$GROUPS . which seems to work OK but I do not know if it is acceptable, because I didn't submit any SlackBuild until now. Finally, I wouldn't compare sbopkg with other tools which work just with ready-made packages, since those tools just need to do what is to be done as root. Best regards, Serban Udrea From chaos.proton at gmail.com Wed Feb 11 10:47:32 2009 From: chaos.proton at gmail.com (Grissiom) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:47:32 +0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <555619.37204.qm@web57708.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <555619.37204.qm@web57708.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:59, Phillip Warner wrote: > --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Chess Griffin wrote: > > > So, the question is: how many people feel strongly about > > keeping the > > ability to run sbopkg as a non-root user? Could folks > > adapt to using > > sbopkg only as root? > > ROOT-only sounds fine to me. The main use of a non-root user for me would > be for testing SlackBuilds, and I don't have to use sbopkg for this (though > root could drop perms as mentioned in a feature request). > > Non-root users really only need to view the Changelog and search/browse the > repo. Non-admins could just use links/lynx on SBo if they need this from > their console ;) > So, is there any possiblity that seperate the script into two, one requered root permission(install/upgrade/remove pkg etc.), one doesn't need(rsync local repository, search/brows installed pkg etc.). This way can avoid a root own huge local repository and convienent for daily use. -- Cheers, Grissiom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marco.bonetti at slackware.it Wed Feb 11 10:53:02 2009 From: marco.bonetti at slackware.it (Marco Bonetti) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote: > Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have > > chown -R root:root . > > which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine). > > At the moment I use > > chown -R $UID:$GROUPS . > > which seems to work OK but I do not know if it is acceptable, because I > didn't submit any SlackBuild until now. (note: I'm not a slackbuilds.org core developer) It's wrong, since the standard is to have executables owned as root:root. Slackware itself changed its own root:bin in favor of root:root some version ago so, for simplicity sake, just stick with the standards :) I use sbopkg as a tool like Gentoo emerge in order to fetch, build and install programs system wide and I like this way. If you're worried about building packages as root, use a separate (virtual, maybe) machine and lock it down: build packages on that machine and install them on yours. ciao -- Marco Bonetti BT3 EeePC enhancing module: http://sid77.slackware.it/bt3/ Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/ Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/ My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/ My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047 From pc_warner at yahoo.com Wed Feb 11 11:51:35 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:51:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] WINE SlackBuild - #chown ... In-Reply-To: <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> Message-ID: <704316.48610.qm@web57702.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Just noticed this in the WINE SlackBuild #chown -R root:root . --phillip From serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Wed Feb 11 15:14:11 2009 From: serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de (Serban Udrea) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:14:11 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> Message-ID: <4992EB43.2030701@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Marco Bonetti wrote: > On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote: >> Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have >> >> chown -R root:root . >> >> which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine). >> >> At the moment I use >> >> chown -R $UID:$GROUPS . >> >> which seems to work OK but I do not know if it is acceptable, because I >> didn't submit any SlackBuild until now. > (note: I'm not a slackbuilds.org core developer) Neither I. > It's wrong, since the standard is to have executables owned as root:root. Not necessarily wrong, if you run the script as root you get the right ownership. Moreover "chown root:root" can be applied in the post-install script to what got installed, it's not necessary to have it in the SlackBuild. An alternative to what I'm doing now may be to define two variables in the SlackBuild, say USR and GRP, which both default to root but may be redefined when running the script. > I use sbopkg as a tool like Gentoo emerge in order to fetch, build and > install programs system wide and I like this way. Your choice. > If you're worried about > building packages as root, use a separate (virtual, maybe) machine and > lock it down: build packages on that machine and install them on yours. Not everybody has a spare machine or the skill and/or time of playing around with virtualisation. I miss at least the machine and the time. Best regards, Serban Udrea From eha at sox.homeip.net Wed Feb 11 15:29:58 2009 From: eha at sox.homeip.net (Eric Hameleers) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:29:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <4992EB43.2030701@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> <4992EB43.2030701@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Serban Udrea wrote: > Marco Bonetti wrote: >> On Wed, February 11, 2009 11:39, Serban Udrea wrote: >>> Another point is that all the SlackBuilds I looked at have >>> >>> chown -R root:root . >>> >>> which doesn't work if you are a normal user (at least on my machine). >>> >>> At the moment I use >>> >>> chown -R $UID:$GROUPS . >>> >>> which seems to work OK but I do not know if it is acceptable, because I >>> didn't submit any SlackBuild until now. >> (note: I'm not a slackbuilds.org core developer) > > Neither I. > >> It's wrong, since the standard is to have executables owned as root:root. > > Not necessarily wrong, if you run the script as root you get the right > ownership. Moreover "chown root:root" can be applied in the post-install > script to what got installed, it's not necessary to have it in the > SlackBuild. > > An alternative to what I'm doing now may be to define two variables in the > SlackBuild, say USR and GRP, which both default to root but may be redefined > when running the script. > >> I use sbopkg as a tool like Gentoo emerge in order to fetch, build and >> install programs system wide and I like this way. > > Your choice. > >> If you're worried about >> building packages as root, use a separate (virtual, maybe) machine and >> lock it down: build packages on that machine and install them on yours. > > Not everybody has a spare machine or the skill and/or time of playing around > with virtualisation. I miss at least the machine and the time. At slackbuilds.org we will only accept submissions that should be run as the root user. This is a policy decision we took when we setup the site, we want our SlackBuilds to behave the same as the SlackBuild scripts you find in Slackware itself. Yes, running a script as root has it's dangers, but that is exactly why we (admins) do the QA checks and add a GPG signature to all our published tarballs: we want to guarantee the users of our scripts that they are safe to run, even as root. Please keep this in mind when you submit the scripts you are developing. Use the template.SlackBuild at http://slackbuilds.org/template.SlackBuild as an example if you are not sure of how to create a script that will be accepted by us. Eric -- Eric Hameleers Email: alien at slackware.com Jabber: alien at jabber.xs4all.nl Gpg fingerprint: F2CE 1B92 EE1F 2C0C E97E 581E 5E56 AAAF A75C BDA0 From arthurfontolan at gmail.com Wed Feb 11 14:59:24 2009 From: arthurfontolan at gmail.com (Arthur Fontolan) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:59:24 -0300 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackbuilds adesklets Message-ID: <285d558c0902110659l316209efx3f5895cb686ed801@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I sent a patch and the modified file adesklets.Slackbuild. The changes that made the original slackbuild was the removal of the lines below as an option to configure. They do not exist in the configure (. / configure --help) of adesklets. They are: - with-perl = /usr /bin /perl \ - enable-eps \ - enable-gif \ - enable-png \ And the inclusion of the lines below, which apply the patch file adesklets.diff, correcting the error with fontconfig> = 2.4 # Copy patch file to the src path cp $ CWD / adesklets.diff $ TMP / $ PRGNAM-$ VERSION # apply the patch patch-p1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: adesklets.SlackBuild Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3485 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: adesklets.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2008 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 11 15:47:40 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:47:40 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] WINE SlackBuild - #chown ... In-Reply-To: <704316.48610.qm@web57702.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> <704316.48610.qm@web57702.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090211094740.0c79fb4d@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:51:35 -0800 (PST) Phillip Warner wrote: > Just noticed this in the WINE SlackBuild > > #chown -R root:root . I don't know who fixed it, but someone beat me to it. Thanks for the heads-up. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mauro.giachero at gmail.com Wed Feb 11 16:00:49 2009 From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:00:49 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Serban Udrea < serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote: > Hello! Hello! I dare to disagree with other posters.I actually do not understand why > anything else but installing the final package needs root rights. I am > (still) working on some packages I hope to submit soon and I do everything > but package installation/removal as a normal user without problems. Thus I > would actually drop root for anything but final installation/removal. In my > opinion it is always good to use root rights as sparingly as possible. > > I do not know how big a problem is to change sbopkg, such that just the > last step needs root rights, but I would say that a first change would be to > have sbopkg default directories with access rights like /tmp. There are two ways of thinking "user-mode" support: - one is to allow normal users to do what a normal user can (like browsing the package repository), but not allowing root-only operations (e.g. removing some options from the menus) -- this is what we currently have in sbopkg; - the other is to always show all the operations, asking the root password for those which are admin-only -- this is what you're talking about. The first option is something that clutters the code and brings very little advantages, thus Chess' proposal to remove it. Your approach would need to be implemented from scratch, as there's currently nothing like that in sbopkg. That would require at least the usage of fakeroot (which is unsupported by the SBo admins and therefore a possible source of problems) and the admin should set up sudo and use directories with proper access permissions (the security-aware defaults aren't likely to change). This can happen at some point in the future. But don't expect it to happen tomorrow ;-) Thank you for daring to disagree! > Regards -- Mauro Giachero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 11 16:40:46 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:40:46 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090211 Message-ID: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> Wed Feb 11 16:38:56 UTC 2009 academic/ent: Added - ent is a pseudorandom number sequence test program. Thanks to B. Watson. --rworkman academic/speedcrunch: Added - SpeedCrunch is a fast, high precision and powerful desktop calculator. Thanks to Larry Hajali. --rworkman desktop/crystal: Updated for version 1.0.7. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero development/kdbg: Updated for version 2.1.1. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --rworkman development/monotone: Added - Monotone is a distributed version control system. Thanks to Joao Felipe Santos. --rworkman development/openmpi: Updated for version 1.3. Thanks to Aleksandar Samardzic. --dsomero games/frotz: Added - Frotz is an interpreter for Infocom games and other Z-machine games. Thanks to Beej Jorgensen. --rworkman graphics/raw-thumbnailer: Updated for version 0.2. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero libraries/SDL_gfx: Updated for version 2.0.18. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero libraries/exempi: Updated for version 2.1.0. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero libraries/gtksourceview: Updated for version 2.4.2. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero libraries/libopenraw: Updated for version 0.0.5. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero libraries/slib: Fixed a problem with the /usr/bin/slib script having some references to the $PKG directory; the upstream Makefile is quite, um, bad. Thanks to Old_Fogie for the report. --rworkman libraries/yaz: Updated for version 3.0.42. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero misc/bchunk: Added - bchunk (bin chunker) is used for converting bin/cue images to ISO images. Thanks to Vincent Batts. --rworkman misc/kvm: Updated for version 83. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman multimedia/gst-plugins-good: Updated for version 0.10.13. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero network/GhostInTheMail: Added - Ghost In The Mail is a very basic mail client. Thanks to majk. --rworkman network/gns3: Added - GNS3 is a graphical network simulator for Cisco networks. Thanks to Alam Guntur Nugroho. --rworkman network/hostapd: Updated for version 0.5.11. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman network/js: Updated for version 1.7.0. Thanks to David Woodfall. --rworkman network/shorewall-{common,perl,shell}: Added - the Shoreline Firewall, more commonly known as Shorewall, is a frontend to netfilter/iptables. Thanks to "ArTourter" --rworkman network/squid: Updated for version 3.0STABLE13. Thanks to David Somero. network/wireshark: Updated for version 1.0.6. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero network/xtables-addons: Fixed the build script to not include the make-generated module metadata inside the package. --rworkman office/calcurse: Updated for version 2.5. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero office/openoffice.org: Fixed a bug in the build script caused by removing the fonts from the package (yeah, I should have known). We're now only removing the DejaVu and Liberation fonts, leaving the opens___.ttf (which is used by some formulas) there. Thanks to Mauro Giachero for the bug report, analysis, and patch. --rworkman office/kile: Updated for version 2.0.3. Thanks to Michiel van Wessem. --dsomero system/clex: Added - CLEX is a file manager with a full-screen user interface written in C with the curses library. Thanks to majk. --rworkman system/gparted: Updated for version 0.4.2. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero system/postgresql: Updated for version 8.3.6. Thanks to Adis Nezirovic. system/webmin: Updated for version 1.450. Thanks to David Somero. --rworkman From fullofdaylight at no-log.org Wed Feb 11 21:00:59 2009 From: fullofdaylight at no-log.org (fullofdaylight at no-log.org) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:00:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [xmoto] Can't compile 0.5.0 due to sqlite? Message-ID: <60699.AVAGD19SXH8=.1234386059.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Hello, I'm trying to update the xmoto SlackBuild (still at 0.2.4 when 0.5.0 has been out for some time), but can't get the program to compile. Independently from the options passed, the configure step fails at : """ checking sqlite3.h usability... yes checking sqlite3.h presence... yes checking for sqlite3.h... yes checking for main in -lsqlite3... no configure: error: "Linking against sqlite3 failed." """ I'm using the unmodified sqlite3 from the stock Slackware 12.2. I'd like to know if others are getting the same result, and if so if it's a Slackware related problem or an xmoto one. Thanks! From hba.nihilismus at gmail.com Thu Feb 12 06:03:28 2009 From: hba.nihilismus at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Antonio_Hern=C3=A1ndez_Blas?=) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:03:28 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Typo in gnustep-base's slack-desc. Message-ID: <39be090902112203x1250fbe0i8568cf4341815f1a@mail.gmail.com> In http://slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/12.2/libraries/gnustep-base/slack-desc there's this line: gnustep-make: Homepage: http://www.gnustep.org It should be: gnustep-base: Homepage: http://www.gnustep.org All the others gnustep-* slack-descs are correct. -hba From kackmail at yahoo.de Thu Feb 12 13:16:00 2009 From: kackmail at yahoo.de (Sepp Meier) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:16:00 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Request for Miro 2.0 Message-ID: <415881.93651.qm@web24202.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Hello, I didn't find anything about requests for Slackbuilds in the FAQ, so I simply ask here and hope, this is the right place to do. I would like to have a Slackbuild Miro 2.0, but I don't have any Phyton expierience, and do absolutely not understand how it installs. Maybe someone of the Slackbuild team or a contributor is also interested in Miro 2.0 and has the required knowledge to do a Slackbuild, this would be great. Thanks, Joe From alkos333 at gmail.com Thu Feb 12 15:45:12 2009 From: alkos333 at gmail.com (alkos333) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:45:12 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090211 In-Reply-To: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> References: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> Message-ID: 2009/2/11 Robby Workman : > misc/kvm: Updated for version 83. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman Still getting the error when it gets to the mv command for the usr/man From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Thu Feb 12 18:22:25 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:22:25 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090211 In-Reply-To: References: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> Message-ID: <20090212122225.05c9e0cf@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:45:12 -0600 alkos333 wrote: > 2009/2/11 Robby Workman : > > misc/kvm: Updated for version 83. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. > > --rworkman > > Still getting the error when it gets to the mv command for the usr/man Check again - it works fine here. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From burningc at sdf.lonestar.org Thu Feb 12 19:47:44 2009 From: burningc at sdf.lonestar.org (Glenn Becker) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Request for Miro 2.0 In-Reply-To: <415881.93651.qm@web24202.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <415881.93651.qm@web24202.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Message-ID: > I didn't find anything about requests for Slackbuilds in the FAQ, so I > simply ask here and hope, this is the right place to do. > I would like to have a Slackbuild Miro 2.0, but I don't have any Phyton > expierience, and do absolutely not understand how it installs. Maybe > someone of the Slackbuild team or a contributor is also interested in > Miro 2.0 and has the required knowledge to do a Slackbuild, this would > be great. I don't know whether there is such a thing but I'd like to see something like it. I was sitting down to write my first - ever SlackBuild last night and came away thinking the package I had in mind might not be the best for a first shot ... and now I don't know what to replace it with! If there was a 'wish list' I could look it over and pick something. :) Just my 2 pfennigs. +-----------------------------------------------------+ Glenn Becker - burningc at sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org +-----------------------------------------------------+ From banderols at gmail.com Fri Feb 13 08:24:13 2009 From: banderols at gmail.com (Murat D. Kadirov) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:24:13 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090211 In-Reply-To: References: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> Message-ID: <20090213082413.GA3827@darkstar> 09:45 Thu 12 Feb, alkos333 wrote: > 2009/2/11 Robby Workman : > > misc/kvm: Updated for version 83. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman > > Still getting the error when it gets to the mv command for the usr/man tetex is installed? -- Murat D. Kadirov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at alkos333.net Fri Feb 13 14:25:14 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:25:14 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090211 In-Reply-To: <20090213082413.GA3827@darkstar> References: <20090211164046.GA21575@slackbuilds.org> <20090213082413.GA3827@darkstar> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Murat D. Kadirov wrote: > tetex is installed? Nope, that was the problem. Thank you! -- Sent from: DeKalb Illinois United States. Jay London - "My father would take me to the playground, and put me on mood swings." From alan at lizella.net Fri Feb 13 14:48:41 2009 From: alan at lizella.net (Alan Hicks) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Moving sbopkg to /usr/sbin and require root In-Reply-To: <4992EB43.2030701@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20090211011300.GA13725@localhost> <4992AAD3.5070202@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> <37086.212.48.3.167.1234349582.squirrel@webmail.slackware.it> <4992EB43.2030701@skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: <20090213094841.3252948e@raven.lizella.net> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:14:11 +0100 Serban Udrea wrote: > >> At the moment I use > >> > >> chown -R $UID:$GROUPS . > > > It's wrong, since the standard is to have executables owned as > > root:root. > > Not necessarily wrong, if you run the script as root you get the > right ownership. Moreover "chown root:root" can be applied in the > post-install script to what got installed, it's not necessary to have > it in the SlackBuild. Generally speaking, chown/chmod statements in the doinst.sh script are begging for trouble and should almost never be done. Any large package could have thousands, even tens of thousands of these files, and you'd either have to wildcard match them, or list them individually. Then we get to permissions problems on directories. Imagine some one doing this. chown -R /usr root:root chmod -R 755 /usr Instant broken box. There's one reason we don't accept things like that as "solutions", but there are others as well. -- It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, Than for a man to hear the song of fools. Ecclesiastes 7:5 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joao.eel at gmail.com Fri Feb 13 23:17:58 2009 From: joao.eel at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Felipe_Santos?=) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:17:58 -0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Neverball URL and download location changed Message-ID: Hello, I tried to run the Neverball SlackBuild but the download fails. I googled and found that the new homepage for this project is http://www.neverball.org and the download location is http://www.neverball.org/neverball-1.5.0.tar.gz. md5sum here is c170b502e2c5507846e946cdddd8a0ad. Some changes to the SlackBuild will be necessary for it to work - the patch included does not work anymore and the icons were moved to the dist/ directory. I can try to fix my script and submit it if the maintainer does not have the time to fix his one :) -- Jo?o From melmothx at gmail.com Sun Feb 15 12:16:11 2009 From: melmothx at gmail.com (Marco Pessotto) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:16:11 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] rxvt-unicode: TERMINFO entry installed in / Message-ID: <87k57rj3p0.fsf@gmail.com> Hi all. The rxvt-unicode Slackbuild install the TERMINFO entry in the / and not in $PKG. This issue is not a problem if the package is installed in the same machine, but *is* an issue if the package are reused or redistributed or if the package generation is made by a regular user: Solution: make mkdir -p $PKG/usr/share/terminfo TERMINFO=$PKG/usr/share/terminfo make install DESTDIR=$PKG And seems to works. (thanks to Corrado Franco) Bests Marco Pessotto From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Mon Feb 16 00:36:26 2009 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090215 Message-ID: <200902151936.27027.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Sun Feb 15 22:47:54 UTC 2009 academic/genius: Added - genius is a super cool math computation program similar to matlab and maple. Thanks to Vincent Batts. --dsomero academic/gwyddion: Updated for version 2.13. Thanks to Daniil Bratashov. --dsomero audio/aacgain: Updated for version 1.8. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --dsomero audio/faac: Updated for version 1.28. Thanks to Nille Akerstrom. --rworkman audio/faad2: Updated for version 2.7. Thanks to Nille Akerstrom. --rworkman audio/gmusicbrowser: Updated for version 1.0.1. Thanks to Michael Wagner. --dsomero audio/jack-audio-connection-kit: Updated for version 0.116.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --dsomero audio/mpd: Updated for version 0.14.2. Thanks to Andrew Brouwers. --dsomero desktop/awesome: Updated for version 2.3.5. Thanks to Chess Griffin. --dsomero development/Quarter: Updated for version 1.0.0. Thanks to Aleksandar Samardzic. --Michiel development/gputils: Added - gputils is a collection of tools for the Microchip (TM) PIC microcontrollers. Thanks to "GPLeo". --dsomero development/piklab: Added - piklab is an integrated development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers. Thanks to "GPLeo". --dsomero development/python3: Updated for version 3.0.1. Thanks to Audrius Kazukauskas. --dsomero games/prboom: Updated for version 2.5.0. Thanks to Manuel Mantilla. --dsomero games/transfusion: Added - transfusion is a port of the game Blood to the DarkPlaces Quake engine. Thanks to B. Watson. --dsomero graphics/Opcion: Added - Opcion is a font viewer app written in java. Thanks to Robby Workman. --dsomero graphics/dcraw: Updated for version 8.91. Thanks to Nishant Limbachia. --Michiel graphics/svp: Added - svp is a ghostscript front end for svgalib. Thanks to Luis Henrique. --dsomero libraries/c-ares: Added - c-ares is a C library that performs DNS requests and name resolves asynchronously. Thanks to Larry Hajali. --dsomero libraries/libofx: Updated for version 0.9.1. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero libraries/libsamplerate: Miscellaneous build script cleanups. Thanks to Paul Wisehart. --rworkman libraries/libsndfile: Updated for version 1.0.18. Thanks to Paul Wisehart. --rworkman misc/lxappearance: Added - lxappearance is the standard theme switcher of LXDE. Thanks to "majk". --dsomero multimedia/dvgrab: Updated for version 3.3. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman multimedia/gpodder: Updated for version 0.14.1. Thanks to Chess Griffin. --dsomero network/ddclient: Updated for version 3.8.0. Thanks to Iskar Enev. --dsomero network/iw: Updated for version 0.9.9. Thanks to nullboy. --rworkman network/lostirc: Added - lostirc is a simple yet very useful IRC client. Thanks to "majk". --dsomero network/netkit-filesystem: Updated for version F5.0. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman network/netkit-kernel: Updated for version K2.6. Thanks to Murat D. Kadirov. --rworkman network/proxychains: Added - proxychains is a tool that forces any TCP connection made by any given application to follow through proxy like TOR or any other SOCKS4, SOCKS5 or HTTP(S) proxy. Thanks to "GPLeo". --dsomero network/sylpheed: Added - Sylpheed is a simple, lightweight but featureful, and easy-to-use e-mail client. Thanks to "GPLeo". --dsomero office/latex2html: Added - latex2html is a convertor written in Perl that converts LATEX documents to HTML. Thanks to Luis Henrique. --dsomero system/chmsee: Updated for version 1.0.3. Thanks to "Devdatta". --dsomero system/curlftpfs: Updated for version 0.9.2 Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --Michiel system/dc3dd: Updated for version 6.12.2. Thanks to Barry Grundy. --dsomero system/gparted Updated for version 0.4.3. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --dsomero system/lxtask: Added - lxtask is a lightweight and desktop-independent task manager derived from xfce4-taskmanager. Thanks to "majk". --dsomero system/lzip: Updated for version 1.4. Thanks to Barry Grundy. --dsomero system/vhba-module: Updated for version 1.2.1. Thanks to Niklas "Nille" ?kerstr?m. --dsomero From pc_warner at yahoo.com Mon Feb 16 09:02:00 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:02:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] rxvt-unicode: TERMINFO entry installed in / In-Reply-To: <87k57rj3p0.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: <617855.27010.qm@web57704.mail.re3.yahoo.com> --- On Sun, 2/15/09, Marco Pessotto wrote: > From: Marco Pessotto > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] rxvt-unicode: TERMINFO entry installed in / > To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 4:16 AM > Hi all. > > The rxvt-unicode Slackbuild install the TERMINFO entry in > the / and not > in $PKG. This issue is not a problem if the package is > installed in the > same machine, but *is* an issue if the package are reused > or > redistributed or if the package generation is made by a > regular user: > > Solution: > > make > mkdir -p $PKG/usr/share/terminfo > TERMINFO=$PKG/usr/share/terminfo make install DESTDIR=$PKG > > And seems to works. (thanks to Corrado Franco) > > Bests > > Marco Pessotto I have verified the problem, but not the solution. --phillip From joao.eel at gmail.com Tue Feb 17 00:47:11 2009 From: joao.eel at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Felipe_Santos?=) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:47:11 -0300 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Trouble with mpd after faad2 update Message-ID: Hello, I've just updated faad2 and mpd through the new versions from SlackBuilds.org and now when I run mpd I get this: mpd: error while loading shared libraries: libfaad.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory A symlink from libfaad.so.2.0.0 to libfaad.so.0 fixes it, but it would be nicer if mpd could be configured to point to the right file. Does anybody know a better fix to this issue? -- Jo?o From erik at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 17 01:50:28 2009 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:50:28 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Trouble with mpd after faad2 update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090216195028.66db580c@shaggy.scooby> On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Jo?o Felipe Santos wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I've just updated faad2 and mpd through the new versions from > SlackBuilds.org and now when I run mpd I get this: > > mpd: error while loading shared libraries: libfaad.so.0: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory I ran into the same problem, you need to recompile ffmpeg. You can see the error in the output of mpd's configure. -- Erik Hanson http://slackbuilds.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joao.eel at gmail.com Tue Feb 17 02:10:26 2009 From: joao.eel at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Felipe_Santos?=) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:10:26 -0300 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Trouble with mpd after faad2 update In-Reply-To: <20090216195028.66db580c@shaggy.scooby> References: <20090216195028.66db580c@shaggy.scooby> Message-ID: On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Erik Hanson wrote: > On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Jo?o Felipe Santos wrote: > > > Hi, > > I ran into the same problem, you need to recompile ffmpeg. You can see > the error in the output of mpd's configure. > > -- > Erik Hanson Hello Erik, thanks for your reply. I had read the logfile but I think my brain's log parser has a bug ;) Everything is working as expected now. -- Jo?o From xma at gnu.org Wed Feb 18 21:25:05 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (Xavier Maillard) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:25:05 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] emacs section ? In-Reply-To: "adamsonj@email.unc.edu"'s message of Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:03:33 -0500 Message-ID: <200902182125.n1ILP5Np002788@zogzog.maillard.mobi> [catching up my mail] > Probably they should go to the relevant category if it's clear -- E.g. AUCTeX is in the "Office" section. I will say that I didn't look there and overlooked this SlackBuild ;) I also have one for bbdb and a few others --- I will submit them. What do you have in your list ? :) Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From xma at gnu.org Wed Feb 18 21:25:07 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (Xavier Maillard) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:25:07 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090215 In-Reply-To: "xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org"'s message of Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:36:26 -0500 Message-ID: <200902182125.n1ILP7Sh002797@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, audio/gmusicbrowser: Updated for version 1.0.1. Thanks to Michael Wagner. --dsomero I am pretty sure Michael Wagner did not push this update but *I* ;) I did not change the MAINTAINER entry in the info file (is it bad ?). If anything breaks, it is not Michael's fault but mine. Sorry to bother. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 18 21:30:59 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:59 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090215 In-Reply-To: <200902182125.n1ILP7Sh002797@zogzog.maillard.mobi> References: <200902182125.n1ILP7Sh002797@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Message-ID: <20090218153059.791f3373@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:25:07 +0100 Xavier Maillard wrote: > Hi, > > audio/gmusicbrowser: Updated for version 1.0.1. > Thanks to Michael Wagner. --dsomero > > I am pretty sure Michael Wagner did not push this update but *I* > ;) I did not change the MAINTAINER entry in the info file (is it > bad ?). If anything breaks, it is not Michael's fault but mine. > Sorry to bother. Aha! Sorry about that, but there's no way for us to know that unless a note is in the "Comments" section. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fullofdaylight at no-log.org Thu Feb 19 22:38:51 2009 From: fullofdaylight at no-log.org (fullofdaylight at no-log.org) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:38:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? Message-ID: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Hello, This is slightly off-topic since it doesn't deal with SlackBuilds, but I'd like to know your opinion on a SBo package repository (read "third party"). - Given SBo is the top quality source for additional software under Slackware, - given most of the proposed software is under an OSS license, - given users will customize SlackBuilds only when needed and otherwise use the default settings, - given compilation can take a while (Battle for Wesnoth anyone?), would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? Some programs couldn't be redistributed as packages due to licensing issues, and some would need the user to choose compilation options, but the vast majority would work. Are there issues that would make it a bad idea? Or in the contrary would it be a useful, convenient way to get quality packages? Thanks! From pprkut at liwjatan.at Thu Feb 19 23:34:50 2009 From: pprkut at liwjatan.at (Heinz Wiesinger) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:34:50 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> References: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Message-ID: <200902200034.53308.pprkut@liwjatan.at> fullofdaylight at no-log.org wrote: > Hello, > > This is slightly off-topic since it doesn't deal with SlackBuilds, but I'd > like to know your opinion on a SBo package repository (read "third > party"). Ok, so my opinion: just don't. Reasons: > - Given SBo is the top quality source for additional software under > Slackware, Agreed. So any other repository, and especially package repository would be not as "top". So why bother if there's something better.... >[...] > - given compilation can take a while (Battle for Wesnoth anyone?), > would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing > packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? "properly" has a very loose definition. When is a package "properly" compiled? When it doesn't include unnecessary stuff? What exactly is "unnecessary"? You see, some scripts have options to be chosen to extend it or cut it down (as you said elsewhere), but some don't. And you still can make them not use stuff by just not having the required deps installed. For me, "properly" means "as I want it to be" combined with "it should work", which... doesn't always work out......but you hopefully get the point. > Are there issues that would make it a bad idea? Or in the contrary would > it be a useful, convenient way to get quality packages? In the end I think this is about compiling vs. not compiling. Is this really an issue? It's not like we're gentoo.... Grs, Heinz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From nille.kungen at gmail.com Fri Feb 20 01:50:55 2009 From: nille.kungen at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Niklas_=27Nille=27_=C5kerstr=F6m?=) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:50:55 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> References: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Message-ID: <499E0C7F.2000609@gmail.com> fullofdaylight at no-log.org skrev: > - Given SBo is the top quality source for additional software under > Slackware, > - given most of the proposed software is under an OSS license, > - given users will customize SlackBuilds only when needed and otherwise > use the default settings, > I think it's because slackbuild only ship slackbuilds that makes it so good and it's so easy to customize and make packages that suits your needs > - given compilation can take a while (Battle for Wesnoth anyone?), > would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing > packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? > You are free to do what ever you want but i can't see how third party packages would be needed. The good thing would be that the *.SlackBuild would be included in the docs dir. How could anyone know how an properly compiled package that suits your needs or system would look like? And is it needed? because some maintainers already have there own websites where they do have packages. /Nille From mikedawg at gmail.com Fri Feb 20 04:01:40 2009 From: mikedawg at gmail.com (Mike Harris) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:01:40 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Request: Cyrus-IMAPd Message-ID: <5268af340902192001o15e23f5o638a9675db3db28d@mail.gmail.com> Hi guys, First I want to tell you how great your site and repository is. Unfortunately I haven't heard of it until recently, I'm used to the "old-school" compiling. After chatting on some other forums, I chatted with an administrator, from this site, and figured I'd give it a shot. Anyways, I'm looking for a slackbuild of cyrus-imapd. I've been having such a tough time building it on my system, I turned to look for a slackbuild. I know the user I spoke with was running the cyrus-imapd server, and wanted to see if I could convince someone to throw a slackbuild together. Anyways, keep up the good work, and now that I've found this site, I'll contribute some code of my own that I have built for my previous slackware setups. Thanks -- Mike From eha at sox.homeip.net Fri Feb 20 08:42:58 2009 From: eha at sox.homeip.net (Eric Hameleers) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:42:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> References: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 fullofdaylight at no-log.org wrote: > would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing > packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? I am not going to tell you whether or not you should create such a repository. I know there are several package repositories that are basically using the SlackBuild scripts we provide at SBo to create the packages. However, there is a good reason you never see the phrase "based on SBo scripts" on these repositories' home pages. The slackbuilds.org team does not want to be affiliated to any 3rd package repository. The reason? We provide QA-tested SlackBuild scripts submitted by a large community of Slackware enthousiasts. The admin team tests these scripts. By creating a GPG signature file (the .asc file) for an approved tarball we say "this script works as advertised, and running it as root will not harm your computer". Being able to verify the tarball's GPG signature means that you can be sure the script you are going to use is _exactly_ the one that we tested. Now, with pre-built packages based on SBo scripts you are _never_ going to be certain that the SlackBuild used to produce the package was identical to the one that got a stamp of approval from the SBo admins. This means, that we do not want to see someone advertising that he is providing packages based on slackbuilds.org scripts. We do not have control over the end product, so we do not assume any responsibility for it. Eric - -- Eric Hameleers Email: alien at slackware.com Jabber: alien at jabber.xs4all.nl Gpg fingerprint: F2CE 1B92 EE1F 2C0C E97E 581E 5E56 AAAF A75C BDA0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFJnm0XXlaqr6dcvaARAsMrAKCJxxhDQwS5n3brqA4acJj3Oa6M2gCgi/FI /5+7o7a2XqHUGF2Qn2hm06g= =YfXl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From yallaone at gmail.com Fri Feb 20 13:40:11 2009 From: yallaone at gmail.com (Halim Issa) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:40:11 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Put a security warning in Adobe Reader SlackBuild? Message-ID: <200902201440.12184.yallaone@gmail.com> Hi, Seems like there's a critical vulnerability identified in Adobe Reader, also applicable to Linux.. Since Adobe apparently doesn't have any plans to fix this for another three weeks, would it be an idea to put a warning in the acroread SlackBuild in the meantime? http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa09-01.html Which also brings up a related question, if there perhaps is a need for a slackbuilds-security mailing list to warn against possible vulnerabilities in a SlackBuild. It's a more-than-dual-egged-sword challenge, since keeping that up-to-date would be a nightmare and warning on some programs might give false sense of security of others... Still perhaps worth a debate? Just my $.02 From pprkut at liwjatan.at Fri Feb 20 13:54:16 2009 From: pprkut at liwjatan.at (Heinz Wiesinger) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:54:16 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Put a security warning in Adobe Reader SlackBuild? In-Reply-To: <200902201440.12184.yallaone@gmail.com> References: <200902201440.12184.yallaone@gmail.com> Message-ID: <200902201454.24164.pprkut@liwjatan.at> Halim Issa wrote: > Hi, > > Seems like there's a critical vulnerability identified in Adobe Reader, > also applicable to Linux.. Since Adobe apparently doesn't have any plans to > fix this for another three weeks, would it be an idea to put a warning in > the acroread SlackBuild in the meantime? > > http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa09-01.html Seems reasonable, although I would prefer to have that information in the README. Can an admin take care of this please? I will update the script as soon as a new version is available. Grs, Heinz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: From fullofdaylight at no-log.org Fri Feb 20 14:09:10 2009 From: fullofdaylight at no-log.org (fullofdaylight at no-log.org) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:09:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: References: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Message-ID: <23724.B1cEDV8DXi0=.1235138950.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Thank you all, and especially Eric, for your insightful comments. It makes it clearer for me. I agree that if I am to create such a repository it has not to be affiliated with SBo (although I think SBo _has_ to be cited as the SlackBuilds' source), and that one has to be well-informed one can't give it the same level of trust. The rationale behind my idea is that it is convenient to have only one source for additional packages instead of cherry-picking between several ones. Additionally I don't trust other packages/SlackBuild sources (LinuxPackages, Slacky, any individual repository, etc) as much as I trust SBo. While there are SlackBuilds that need customization before being compiled, there are numerous ones where simply executing the unmodified SlackBuild is fine, and where the result doesn't heavily depends on which other programs are already installed. If I have time maybe I'll try to set up something, and see if people are interested in the project or if they generally prefer to compile programs themselves. Cheers! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 fullofdaylight at no-log.org wrote: > >> would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing >> packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? > > I am not going to tell you whether or not you should create such a > repository. I know there are several package repositories that are > basically using the SlackBuild scripts we provide at SBo to create the > packages. > > However, there is a good reason you never see the phrase "based on SBo > scripts" on these repositories' home pages. The slackbuilds.org team does > not want to be affiliated to any 3rd package repository. > > The reason? We provide QA-tested SlackBuild scripts submitted by a large > community of Slackware enthousiasts. The admin team tests these scripts. > > By creating a GPG signature file (the .asc file) for an approved tarball > we say "this script works as advertised, and running it as root will not > harm your computer". Being able to verify the tarball's GPG signature > means that you can be sure the script you are going to use is _exactly_ > the one that we tested. > > Now, with pre-built packages based on SBo scripts you are _never_ going to > be certain that the SlackBuild used to produce the package was identical > to the one that got a stamp of approval from the SBo admins. This means, > that we do not want to see someone advertising that he is providing > packages based on slackbuilds.org scripts. We do not have control over the > end product, so we do not assume any responsibility for it. > > Eric > > - -- > Eric Hameleers > Email: alien at slackware.com > Jabber: alien at jabber.xs4all.nl > Gpg fingerprint: F2CE 1B92 EE1F 2C0C E97E 581E 5E56 AAAF A75C BDA0 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ > > iD8DBQFJnm0XXlaqr6dcvaARAsMrAKCJxxhDQwS5n3brqA4acJj3Oa6M2gCgi/FI > /5+7o7a2XqHUGF2Qn2hm06g= > =YfXl > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -- From pc_warner at yahoo.com Fri Feb 20 14:55:24 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:55:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Put a security warning in Adobe Reader SlackBuild? In-Reply-To: <200902201440.12184.yallaone@gmail.com> Message-ID: <586537.25461.qm@web57707.mail.re3.yahoo.com> --- On Fri, 2/20/09, Halim Issa wrote: > Seems like there's a critical vulnerability identified > in Adobe Reader, also > applicable to Linux.. Since Adobe apparently doesn't > have any plans to fix this > for another three weeks, would it be an idea to put a > warning in the acroread > SlackBuild in the meantime? > > http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa09-01.html >From what I understand disabling js in acroread will protect you from this for now. > Which also brings up a related question, if there perhaps > is a need for a > slackbuilds-security mailing list to warn against possible > vulnerabilities in > a SlackBuild. It's a more-than-dual-egged-sword > challenge, since keeping that > up-to-date would be a nightmare and warning on some > programs might give false > sense of security of others... > Still perhaps worth a debate? I like the idea, but for now I get all of that info from this list and the Changelog. A simple grep for security in the Changelog usually shows all of the important updates. If the admins don't mind the extra work though... --phillip From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 20 16:02:23 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:02:23 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] rxvt-unicode: TERMINFO entry installed in / In-Reply-To: <617855.27010.qm@web57704.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <87k57rj3p0.fsf@gmail.com> <617855.27010.qm@web57704.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090220100223.7a05dbfd@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:02:00 -0800 (PST) Phillip Warner wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/15/09, Marco Pessotto wrote: > > The rxvt-unicode Slackbuild install the TERMINFO entry in > > the / and not > > in $PKG. This issue is not a problem if the package is > > installed in the > > same machine, but *is* an issue if the package are reused > > or > > redistributed or if the package generation is made by a > > regular user: > > > > Solution: > > > > make > > mkdir -p $PKG/usr/share/terminfo > > TERMINFO=$PKG/usr/share/terminfo make install DESTDIR=$PKG > > > > And seems to works. (thanks to Corrado Franco) > > > > I have verified the problem, but not the solution. The terminfo file is getting installed from ./doc/Makefile via the tic(1) command. Based on tic(1), this does appear to be the correct solution, so I'll get that fixed on this end and merged with the next update. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From erik at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 20 18:19:15 2009 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:19:15 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: <23724.B1cEDV8DXi0=.1235138950.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> References: <39617.AVAGD19QC3s=.1235083131.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> <23724.B1cEDV8DXi0=.1235138950.squirrel@webmail.no-log.org> Message-ID: <20090220121915.7c21e3c3@shaggy.scooby> On Feb 20, 2009, at 3:09 PM, fullofdaylight at no-log.org wrote: > I agree that if I am to create such a repository it has not to be > affiliated with SBo (although I think SBo _has_ to be cited as the > SlackBuilds' source), and that one has to be well-informed one can't give > it the same level of trust. We will not put our name behind this. It has come up in the past, we have discussed it, and it will not happen. > The rationale behind my idea is that it is convenient to have only one > source for additional packages instead of cherry-picking between several > ones. Additionally I don't trust other packages/SlackBuild sources > (LinuxPackages, Slacky, any individual repository, etc) as much as I trust > SBo. These other repositories already exist. You can't take them away by making an SBo repository. I don't think any of us admins would even want that. We didn't set out to take away choice. > While there are SlackBuilds that need customization before being compiled, > there are numerous ones where simply executing the unmodified SlackBuild > is fine, and where the result doesn't heavily depends on which other > programs are already installed. That's actually sort of the point, in an indirect way. People don't necessarily run a stock 12.2 system (I sure as hell don't). While all we can do is test against a full 12.2 install, the scripts can be used in any number of situations. Packages, maybe not so much. > If I have time maybe I'll try to set up something, and see if people are > interested in the project or if they generally prefer to compile programs > themselves. While I don't doubt that some people would find a pre-compiled package repository useful, I just don't want to be on the hook for support. And that's basically why we have to draw a line. -- Erik Hanson http://slackbuilds.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 20 21:12:14 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:12:14 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090220 Message-ID: <20090220211214.GA27526@slackbuilds.org> Fri Feb 20 21:04:19 UTC 2009 development/boost: Updated for version 1.38.0. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel development/scons: Updated for version 1.2.0 Thanks to Kyle Guinn. --michiel development/saxonb: Added - Saxonb-B is the open source version of Saxonica's Saxon-SA schema aware XSLT processor. Thanks to Robert Allen. --rworkman development/xalan-j: Added - Xalan-J is a java XSLT 1.0 processor. Thanks to Robert Allen. --rworkman games/desmume: Updated for version 0.9.1 and added some notes to the README about compile problems with the nvidia driver installed. Thanks to Larry Hajali and Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman libraries/fftw: Updated for version 3.2.1 along with some script cleanup. Thanks to Kyle Guinn. --rworkman libraries/libarchive: Updated for version 2.6.1. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel libraries/libical: Updated for version 0.43. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel libraries/libkate: Updated for version 0.30. Thanks to Nishant Limbachia. --michiel libraries/mmpython: Added - MMPython is a Media Meta Data retrieval framework written in python. Thanks to Larry Hajali. --michiel libraries/mysql++: Added - MySQL++ is a C++ wrapper for the MySQL C API. Thanks to Lorenzo Stramaccia. --michiel libraries/qwt: Added - Qwt is a GUI Components and utility for programs with technical background. Thanks to Zordrak. --rworkman,michiel misc/pinfo: Added - Pinfo is an info file viewer. Thanks to Arun Prasannan. --rworkman network/mz: Updated for version 0.34.6 Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel network/tork: Updated for version 0.31. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel network/udpcast: Updated for version 20081213. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --michiel system/fsarchiver: Updated for version 0.4.1. Thanks to Nishant Limbachia. --michiel system/rxvt-unicode: Fixed a bug with installation of terminfo data. Thanks to Corrado Franco and Marco Pessotto. --rworkman system/virtualbox-{kernel,ose}{,-addons}: Updated for version 2.1.4. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman From cnguyenminhtan at free.fr Sat Feb 21 20:36:00 2009 From: cnguyenminhtan at free.fr (cnguyenminhtan at free.fr) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 21:36:00 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1055821995.2042191235248560515.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> Hello Eric, You said: *************** This means, that we do not want to see someone advertising that he is providing packages based on slackbuilds.org scripts. ************** Oops, does it mean that I should modify my home page where I put my extra packages: http://cnguyenminhtan.free.fr/ KR, Christophe ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Eric Hameleers" ?: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" Envoy?: Vendredi 20 F?vrier 2009 09:42:58 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Use for a package repository? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 fullofdaylight at no-log.org wrote: > would it be a good thing if someone creates a repository containing > packages (properly) compiled from SBo SlackBuilds with default settings? I am not going to tell you whether or not you should create such a repository. I know there are several package repositories that are basically using the SlackBuild scripts we provide at SBo to create the packages. However, there is a good reason you never see the phrase "based on SBo scripts" on these repositories' home pages. The slackbuilds.org team does not want to be affiliated to any 3rd package repository. The reason? We provide QA-tested SlackBuild scripts submitted by a large community of Slackware enthousiasts. The admin team tests these scripts. By creating a GPG signature file (the .asc file) for an approved tarball we say "this script works as advertised, and running it as root will not harm your computer". Being able to verify the tarball's GPG signature means that you can be sure the script you are going to use is _exactly_ the one that we tested. Now, with pre-built packages based on SBo scripts you are _never_ going to be certain that the SlackBuild used to produce the package was identical to the one that got a stamp of approval from the SBo admins. This means, that we do not want to see someone advertising that he is providing packages based on slackbuilds.org scripts. We do not have control over the end product, so we do not assume any responsibility for it. Eric - -- Eric Hameleers Email: alien at slackware.com Jabber: alien at jabber.xs4all.nl Gpg fingerprint: F2CE 1B92 EE1F 2C0C E97E 581E 5E56 AAAF A75C BDA0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFJnm0XXlaqr6dcvaARAsMrAKCJxxhDQwS5n3brqA4acJj3Oa6M2gCgi/FI /5+7o7a2XqHUGF2Qn2hm06g= =YfXl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ From xma at gnu.org Sun Feb 22 09:25:03 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (Xavier Maillard) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:25:03 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090215 In-Reply-To: message from Robby Workman on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:30:59 -0600 Message-ID: <200902220925.n1M9P3KY021280@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, > audio/gmusicbrowser: Updated for version 1.0.1. > Thanks to Michael Wagner. --dsomero >=20 > I am pretty sure Michael Wagner did not push this update but *I* > ;) I did not change the MAINTAINER entry in the info file (is it > bad ?). If anything breaks, it is not Michael's fault but mine. > Sorry to bother. Aha! Sorry about that, but there's no way for us to know that unless a note is in the "Comments" section. Not a problem, just a warning to be sure Michael won't be injuried if something wrong happens :) Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Sun Feb 22 19:29:24 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:29:24 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20090222 Message-ID: <20090222192924.GA11805@slackbuilds.org> Sun Feb 22 19:15:20 UTC 2009 audio/ardour: Updated for version 2.7.1. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman audio/lmms: Added - LMMS is a free cross-platform alternative to commercial programs like FL Studio (r) which allow you to produce music with your computer. Thanks to "hackedhead" --rworkman audio/rosegarden: Updated for version 1.7.3. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman games/spring: Updated for version 0.78.2.1. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman games/springlobby: Updated for version 0.0.1.10420. Thanks to Erik Hanson. --rworkman graphics/tesseract: Edited to reflect changes to the language packs. Thanks to Pierre Cazenave. --rworkman libraries/slv2: Updated for version 0.6.2. Thanks to Heinz Wiesinger. --rworkman multimedia/dvdrip: Added - dvd::rip is a full featured DVD copy program written in Perl. Thanks to Luis Henrique. --rworkman network/shorewall-{common,perl,shell}: Updated for version 4.2.6. Thanks to Gregory J. L. Tourte. --rworkman network/shorewall6: Added - this package adds ipv6 support to shorewall. Note that neither the submitter nor the approver :) has access to ipv6 for testing, so success/failure reports are encouraged (especially success). Thanks to Gregory J. L. Tourte. --rworkman system/splix: Updated for version 2.0.0. Thanks to Iskar Enev. --rworkman From adamsonj at email.unc.edu Mon Feb 23 15:54:25 2009 From: adamsonj at email.unc.edu (Joel J. Adamson ) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Emacs Snapshot Demand? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <21258.1235404465@email.unc.edu> Dear SlackBuild Users, I have a SlackBuild that builds GNU Emacs from CVS; I could quickly conform it to SlackBuild.org standards. Two questions are in order: 1. Is there demand for this? I have discussed it with Xavier, so I know there is at least one other person who might be interested. 2. Is this the kind of package that is appropriate for SlackBuilds.org? It is a development version of an official package. Let me know, Joel -- Joel J. Adamson -- http://www.unc.edu/~adamsonj University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB #3280, Coker Hall Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280 From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Mon Feb 23 23:06:49 2009 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Emacs Snapshot Demand? In-Reply-To: <21258.1235404465@email.unc.edu> References: <21258.1235404465@email.unc.edu> Message-ID: <200902231806.50160.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> On Monday 23 February 2009 10:54:25 Joel J. Adamson wrote: > Dear SlackBuild Users, > > I have a SlackBuild that builds GNU Emacs from CVS; I could quickly > conform it to SlackBuild.org standards. Two questions are in order: > > 1. Is there demand for this? I have discussed it with Xavier, so I know > there is at least one other person who might be interested. > 2. Is this the kind of package that is appropriate for SlackBuilds.org? > It is a development version of an official package. > > Let me know, > Joel > Slackbuilds.org normally will not accept SlackBuilds for official packages. Quote from http://www.slackbuilds.org/guidelines "As a general rule, we do not accept SlackBuild scripts of software that is included as part of Slackware; however, exceptions may be made by the admin staff on a case-by-case basis. --dsomero From kmuerlen83 at gmail.com Tue Feb 24 04:40:52 2009 From: kmuerlen83 at gmail.com (Kevin Muerlen) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:40:52 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? Message-ID: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> Hello list, I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? Thanks, Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From didier.spaier at epsm.fr Tue Feb 24 15:15:34 2009 From: didier.spaier at epsm.fr (Didier Spaier) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:15:34 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> Le Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:40:52 Kevin Muerlen, vous avez ?crit?: > Hello list, > > I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? > > Thanks, > Kevin > Hello poster, I do not know, but you can find packages & SlackBuilds in Alien Bob's repositories, see http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ Cheers, Didier From joshuakwood at gmail.com Tue Feb 24 16:48:50 2009 From: joshuakwood at gmail.com (JK Wood) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:50 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> Message-ID: <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: > Le Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:40:52 Kevin Muerlen, vous avez ?crit : > > Hello list, > > > > I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > Hello poster, > > I do not know, but you can find packages & SlackBuilds in Alien Bob's > repositories, see http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ > > Cheers, > > Didier > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > VLC is an utter monster to build on Slackware, with a horrid dependency chain and a rather low chance of success. Which is why alienBOB's build is so important. That's one of the few things that I'd rather go to him for than SBo. Read his SlackBuild to find out why. --JK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk Tue Feb 24 17:09:40 2009 From: mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk (Morten Juhl-Johansen =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Z=F6lde-Fej=E9r?=) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:09:40 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090224180940.09ef4b81@espero.syntaktisk.dk> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:50 -0600 JK Wood wrote: > VLC is an utter monster to build on Slackware, with a horrid > dependency chain and a rather low chance of success. Which is why > alienBOB's build is so important. That's one of the few things that > I'd rather go to him for than SBo. Read his SlackBuild to find out > why. > > --JK Agree. I use aBOB's build - works as it should. Yours, Morten __ Morten Juhl-Johansen Z?lde-Fej?r http://syntaktisk.dk * mjjzf at syntaktisk.dk From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Feb 24 17:15:45 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:15:45 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090224111545.1e311bdb@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:50 -0600 JK Wood wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Didier Spaier > wrote: > > > Le Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:40:52 Kevin Muerlen, vous avez > > ?crit : > > > Hello list, > > > > > > I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? > > > > > I do not know, but you can find packages & SlackBuilds in Alien > > Bob's repositories, see > > http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ > > > VLC is an utter monster to build on Slackware, with a horrid > dependency chain and a rather low chance of success. Which is why > alienBOB's build is so important. That's one of the few things that > I'd rather go to him for than SBo. Read his SlackBuild to find out > why. I'm just replying to CC the original poster, as he's not subscribed to the list. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nille.kungen at gmail.com Tue Feb 24 23:08:25 2009 From: nille.kungen at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TmlrbGFzICdOaWxsZScgw4VrZXJzdHLDtm0=?=) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:08:25 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <20090224111545.1e311bdb@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> <20090224111545.1e311bdb@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <49A47DE9.7020001@gmail.com> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:50 -0600 > JK Wood wrote: > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Didier Spaier >> wrote: >> >> >>> Le Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:40:52 Kevin Muerlen, vous avez >>> ?crit : >>> >>>> Hello list, >>>> >>>> I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? >>>> >>>> >>> I do not know, but you can find packages & SlackBuilds in Alien >>> Bob's repositories, see >>> http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ >>> >>> >> VLC is an utter monster to build on Slackware, with a horrid >> dependency chain and a rather low chance of success. Which is why >> alienBOB's build is so important. That's one of the few things that >> I'd rather go to him for than SBo. Read his SlackBuild to find out >> why. >> I was *actually thinking of making one when i made my first slackbuilds thats why i maintain allot of **dependicies** for multimedia. But since the dependicies are only needed at build time then an SBo slackbuild ain't the best way to build vlc and thats why i didn't upload my vlc.SlackBuild AlienBOB's SlackBuild is far the best vlc build script for slackware and i recommend it, and you can't make an slackbuild like that on SBo. So as i see it there is not need for an build on SBo since it can't be as good as AlienBOB's. /Nille //*// * * From xma at gnu.org Tue Feb 24 23:25:03 2009 From: xma at gnu.org (Xavier Maillard) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:25:03 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Emacs Snapshot Demand? In-Reply-To: "xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org"'s message of Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:06:49 -0500 Message-ID: <200902242325.n1ONP3HG023671@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Hi, On Monday 23 February 2009 10:54:25 Joel J. Adamson wrote: > 2. Is this the kind of package that is appropriate for SlackBuilds.org? > It is a development version of an official package. Slackbuilds.org normally will not accept SlackBuilds for official packages. Quote from http://www.slackbuilds.org/guidelines "As a general rule, we do not accept SlackBuild scripts of software that is included as part of Slackware; however, exceptions may be made by the admin staff on a case-by-case basis. Fair enough but how do you fix bugs (if any) on official packages ? Or even simpler, how do you send patch to bump package version ? Reading through Slackware ChangeLog reveals it can happen sometimes. I thought SBo was sort of "Slackware Labs". Regards, Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Wed Feb 25 00:25:06 2009 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Emacs Snapshot Demand? In-Reply-To: <200902242325.n1ONP3HG023671@zogzog.maillard.mobi> References: <200902242325.n1ONP3HG023671@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Message-ID: <200902241925.07093.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 18:25:03 Xavier Maillard wrote: > Fair enough but how do you fix bugs (if any) on official packages > ? Or even simpler, how do you send patch to bump package version > ? Reading through Slackware ChangeLog reveals it can happen > sometimes. I thought SBo was sort of "Slackware Labs". > Slackware is Slackware and SlackBuilds.org is SlackBuilds.org. Bugs/feature request/etc... for official Slackware packages should go to . http://www.slackbuilds.org/faq/#affiliation # Are you affiliated with and/or endorsed by Slackware? * No. We are not affiliated with or officially endorsed by either Patrick Volkerding or Slackware Linux, Inc. This project is maintained by volunteers who wish to contribute something useful to the Slackware user community. Furthermore, for clarity's sake, the concept of a SlackBuild script came from Slackware itself, not from us. From kmuerlen83 at gmail.com Wed Feb 25 00:52:09 2009 From: kmuerlen83 at gmail.com (Kevin Muerlen) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:52:09 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] VLC package? In-Reply-To: <49A47DE9.7020001@gmail.com> References: <11d696810902232040v114f0671p4bd9892361cc1740@mail.gmail.com> <200902241615.34834.didier.spaier@epsm.fr> <6b6812630902240848k656b382ahc901ff7b08b6cc84@mail.gmail.com> <20090224111545.1e311bdb@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <49A47DE9.7020001@gmail.com> Message-ID: <11d696810902241652p3b1c44c0v5eb177871ce39a6f@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Niklas 'Nille' ?kerstr?m < nille.kungen at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:48:50 -0600 >> JK Wood wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Didier Spaier >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Le Tuesday 24 February 2009 05:40:52 Kevin Muerlen, vous avez >>>> ?crit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hello list, >>>>> >>>>> I don't see a VLC package on SBo... Any chance of getting one? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I do not know, but you can find packages & SlackBuilds in Alien >>>> Bob's repositories, see >>>> http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> VLC is an utter monster to build on Slackware, with a horrid >>> dependency chain and a rather low chance of success. Which is why >>> alienBOB's build is so important. That's one of the few things that >>> I'd rather go to him for than SBo. Read his SlackBuild to find out >>> why. >>> >>> >> I was *actually thinking of making one when i made my first slackbuilds > thats why i maintain allot of **dependicies** for multimedia. > But since the dependicies are only needed at build time then an SBo > slackbuild ain't the best way to build vlc and thats why i didn't upload my > vlc.SlackBuild > AlienBOB's SlackBuild is far the best vlc build script for slackware and i > recommend it, and you can't make an slackbuild like that on SBo. > So as i see it there is not need for an build on SBo since it can't be as > good as AlienBOB's. > > /Nille > //*// > > * > * > Thank you Nille, and to all the others who replied. I will try the build at AlienBob's. Thanks! Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pc_warner at yahoo.com Thu Feb 26 01:55:18 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:55:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] docker dl location not working In-Reply-To: <11d696810902241652p3b1c44c0v5eb177871ce39a6f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <668739.58185.qm@web57706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> docker does not seem to be available in the location in the .info file. Try http://dockapps.org/download.php/id/510/docker-1.5.tar.gz md5sum checks out for me. --phillip From timp at timp.com.au Thu Feb 26 02:44:32 2009 From: timp at timp.com.au (Timothy Pollard) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:44:32 +1000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] docker dl location not working In-Reply-To: <668739.58185.qm@web57706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <11d696810902241652p3b1c44c0v5eb177871ce39a6f@mail.gmail.com> <668739.58185.qm@web57706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090226124432.438aca46@shammah.timp.com.au> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:55:18 -0800 (PST) Phillip Warner wrote: > > docker does not seem to be available in the location in the .info file. > > Try http://dockapps.org/download.php/id/510/docker-1.5.tar.gz > > md5sum checks out for me. > > --phillip > The icculus.org (http://icculus.org/openbox/2/docker/docker-1.5.tar.gz) link works OK for me, though dockapps.org seems to be fine as well. -- TimP -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chess at chessgriffin.com Thu Feb 26 15:21:40 2009 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Sbopkg 0.27.0 released Message-ID: <20090226152140.GA18127@localhost> A new version 0.27.0 of sbopkg has been released. Once again, I have had great assistance from several contributors in the form of feature requests, bug reports, and patches. I would like to especially thank Mauro Giachero and slakmagik for their hard work in reviewing code, providing patches, and offering excellent advice and suggestions. This release brings many bug fixes and new features. Please be aware that there are some new variables for sbopkg.conf, so if you are upgrading, be sure to check out the sbopkg.conf.new and merge the changes. Here are a few of the notable items from the ChangeLog.txt: * Commit a patch that adds a new sbopkg.conf configuration variable, QUEUEDIR, where users can define where saved queues are stored; also, when the user wants to load a saved queue, show a list of available saved queues; thanks to slakmagik for the patch. * Add ability to search for keywords in the README files using regular expressions; this new 'string search' can also be narrowed to only search installed packages; thanks to slakmagik for the original patch and implementation and thanks to both slakmagik and Mauro Giachero for cleaning it up and addressing minor issues before the commit. * Add ability to view a diff of an edited .info or SlackBuild file before choosing which one to use; this feature adds two configuration variables to the sbopkg.conf file: DIFF and DIFFOPTS; thanks to Phillip Warner for the suggestion and thanks to Mauro Giachero for helping debug/improve my original implemenation. * Add ability to view more files in each application's folder, i.e. doinst.sh, or *.desktop files; thanks to Phillip Warner for the suggestion and thanks to slakmagik for the patch implementing this feature. * Rework the check for root:root permissions when installing packages; now, if the package does not have root:root permissions, sbopkg will display the output of ls -l and ask if the user wishes to install or abort, rather than only aborting. * Move the -q option to -g (general search) in order to make way for -q, 'quiet mode' where the output of some of the command line options (i.e. the command line progressbar) can be minimized. More quieting will likely occur in future releases. Thanks to alkos333 for the feature request. * Implement a workaround so that the dialog interface now works better with GNU Screen and rxvt-based terminals. Thanks to Phillip Warner for raising the issue and thanks to Mauro Giachero for working on the implementation. * Include a French translation of the two sbopkg man pages. For now, these man pages will be included in the /doc directory until I have time to figure out whether they can be automatically installed in place of the English ones depending on a locale setting. In any event, I would like to extend my thanks to Marie-Claude Collilieux for providing this first translation for sbopkg. I am sure folks will appreciate the work she put into it. If anyone else wants to follow her lead and provide some other translations, I would be happy to include them. Thanks Marie-Claude! * Add in several patches from slakmagik that lets the user choose from saved queues, modifies how the saved queues and backup queues work, and modifies several other queue-related functions and menus. Many thanks to slakmagik for his continually excellent contributions. * Implement an 'autoqueue' by allowing the user to specify queue names to '-b' and '-i' and by adding a -e option whereby the user can specify what to do on errors (stop, ask, or continue). Thanks to Alan Hicks for suggesting this feature and thanks to Mauro Giachero for the implementation. The full ChangeLog.txt can be read here: http://www.sbopkg.org/files/ChangeLog.txt So, to recap, there are three new variables for sbopkg.conf: QUEUEDIR, DIFF, and DIFFOPTS. These are explained in the sbopkg.conf(5) man page and need to be added to your current sbopkg.conf if you are upgrading. A noarch package and source tarball for version 0.27.0 can be found at the sbopkg project website: http://www.sbopkg.org I would also like to make an important announcement about upcoming versions of sbopkg. Now that 0.27.0 is out the door, we are going to take some time off, and then turn our attention to an overall code review/audit with an eye towards making the code more efficient with less bugs. It is unlikely that new features will be implemented. Along with this review, we will be removing the 'user mode' support from sbopkg and changing the codebase so sbopkg runs out of /usr/sbin and requires root privileges, just like several other similar Slackware package tools. Additionally, we will be reviewing the file and directory layout for sbopkg-related items to consider whether things need to be moved. Personally, I am leaning towards moving everything into /var/lib/sbopkg, so there would be /var/lib/sbopkg/{repo,tmp,cache,queues} etc., but we have not spent much time discussing this. If you have any thoughts on what would be a set of sensible defaults in this area, please feel free to speak up. Obviously, if the directory structure is moved, this will require future user intervention in the form of moving your local repo, or adjusting the sbopkg.conf back to where you want things to be stored. Anyway, the point here is simply to let folks know what is on the horizon for future releases. There is no timetable for when the post 0.27.0 release will occur, but this next major release will probably take longer than past releases. I have created a 0.27.0-stable branch in SVN so we can backport fixes and address issues in the 0.27.0 release as they come up. Again, I would like to thank all the contributors to sbopkg. This utility is greatly benefiting from the feedback and assistance of many individuals. Enjoy! -- Chess Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rw at rlworkman.net Thu Feb 26 16:45:49 2009 From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:45:49 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [sbopkg-users] Sbopkg 0.27.0 released In-Reply-To: <20090226152140.GA18127@localhost> References: <20090226152140.GA18127@localhost> Message-ID: <20090226104549.5d675767@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500 Chess Griffin wrote: > * Include a French translation of the two sbopkg man pages. For > now, these man pages will be included in the /doc directory until I > have time to figure out whether they can be automatically installed > in place of the English ones depending on a locale setting. Install them to /usr/man/fr/man?/ See attached patch. > /var/lib/sbopkg/{repo,tmp,cache,queues} etc., but we have not spent > much time discussing this. If you have any thoughts on what would be > a set of sensible defaults in this area, please feel free to speak up. Unless moving to a more self-contained layout simplifies things for you, I wouldn't do it that way. I'd lean more toward using these: /var/tmp/sbopkg /var/cache/sbopkg /var/lib/sbopkg/{queues,repo} Other things might belong in subdirs of /var/{tmp,cache}/sbopkg as appopriate, and probably other things (stuff you want to keep around no matter what) will go in /var/lib/sbopkg. Anyway, hopefully that made a little bit of sense... :-) -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: install_fr_manpages.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 14937 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From me at alkos333.net Thu Feb 26 16:59:37 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:59:37 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [sbopkg-users] Sbopkg 0.27.0 released In-Reply-To: <20090226104549.5d675767@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20090226152140.GA18127@localhost> <20090226104549.5d675767@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: 2009/2/26 Robby Workman : > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:40 -0500 > Chess Griffin wrote: > >> ? * Include a French translation of the two sbopkg man pages. ?For >> now, these man pages will be included in the /doc directory until I >> have time to figure out whether they can be automatically installed >> in place of the English ones depending on a locale setting. > > > Install them to /usr/man/fr/man?/ > > See attached patch. > > >> /var/lib/sbopkg/{repo,tmp,cache,queues} etc., but we have not spent >> much time discussing this. ?If you have any thoughts on what would be >> a set of sensible defaults in this area, please feel free to speak up. > > > Unless moving to a more self-contained layout simplifies things for > you, I wouldn't do it that way. ?I'd lean more toward using these: > ?/var/tmp/sbopkg > ?/var/cache/sbopkg > ?/var/lib/sbopkg/{queues,repo} > ?Other things might belong in subdirs of /var/{tmp,cache}/sbopkg as > ?appopriate, and probably other things (stuff you want to keep around > ?no matter what) will go in /var/lib/sbopkg. ?Anyway, hopefully that > ?made a little bit of sense... :-) I've always used the following layout: root at tpt60:~# ls -l /var/cache/sbopkg/ total 7 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 5160 2009-02-26 10:01 packages/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 104 2009-02-26 10:01 queues/ drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 72 2008-12-12 13:16 slackbuilds/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 1688 2009-02-26 10:01 source/ and /var/log/sbopkg/sbopkg-build-log for the permanent log From thomditom at aktiivi.ath.cx Thu Feb 26 22:21:06 2009 From: thomditom at aktiivi.ath.cx (Thomas Morper) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:21:06 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Flash Player security update Message-ID: <200902262321.06709.thomditom@aktiivi.ath.cx> Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is already in the queue waiting for a push... Adobe has fixed a vulnerability in the Flash Player: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html The download-link from the .info-File now points to version 10.0r22, md5sum is 23e4c2b844db0f87ff62084178aa2b1f. -- From pc_warner at yahoo.com Thu Feb 26 23:52:57 2009 From: pc_warner at yahoo.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:52:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Flash Player security update In-Reply-To: <200902262321.06709.thomditom@aktiivi.ath.cx> Message-ID: <625354.25235.qm@web57705.mail.re3.yahoo.com> thank you, Thomas --- On Thu, 2/26/09, Thomas Morper wrote: > From: Thomas Morper > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Flash Player security update > To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > Date: Thursday, February 26, 2009, 2:21 PM > Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is > already in the queue > waiting for a push... > > Adobe has fixed a vulnerability in the Flash Player: > > > http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html > > The download-link from the .info-File now points to version > 10.0r22, > md5sum is 23e4c2b844db0f87ff62084178aa2b1f. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ From vbatts at hashbangbash.com Fri Feb 27 04:52:58 2009 From: vbatts at hashbangbash.com (Vincent Batts) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:58 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal of SBU marker in README's Message-ID: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are everyone's idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the Single Build Unit (SBU). some package of consensus, and included in the README's could have in SBU's the relative build time of their SlackBuild. for example if libsndfile takes 4 minutes to build on your machine, that would be 1 SBU for you. therefore qt4 would be 45 SBU's and ipcalc would be < 1 SBU this is an idea that would provide more foresight to the prospective builders of any given SBo. vb http://hashbangbash.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 27 05:06:26 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:06:26 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Flash Player security update In-Reply-To: <200902262321.06709.thomditom@aktiivi.ath.cx> References: <200902262321.06709.thomditom@aktiivi.ath.cx> Message-ID: <20090226230626.253c5999@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:21:06 +0100 Thomas Morper wrote: > Just in case this hasn't been addressed yet and is already in the > queue waiting for a push... > > Adobe has fixed a vulnerability in the Flash Player: > > http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-01.html > > The download-link from the .info-File now points to version 10.0r22, > md5sum is 23e4c2b844db0f87ff62084178aa2b1f. > I've got this in pending now. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 27 05:11:45 2009 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:11:45 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal of SBU marker in README's In-Reply-To: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> References: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090226231145.364546ec@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:58 -0600 Vincent Batts wrote: > In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are > everyone's idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the > Single Build Unit (SBU). some package of consensus, and included in > the README's could have in SBU's the relative build time of their > SlackBuild. for example if libsndfile takes 4 minutes to build on > your machine, that would be 1 SBU for you. therefore qt4 would be 45 > SBU's and ipcalc would be < 1 SBU > > this is an idea that would provide more foresight to the prospective > builders of any given SBo. Hrm, I don't know. On one hand, it would certainly be useful information to have, but at the same time, it's error prone -- either the data is very subjective (i.e. "that took forever") or it requires the submitter to time every build they run and compare it against some "standard" build. Besides, something like this would take all the fun out of comparing build times -- there would be this boring "<1SBU" or "10SBU" or "400SBU" instead of "faster than a fifteen year old boy's first time with Eliza Dushku" or "this thing takes a metric assload of time to build" -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joshuakwood at gmail.com Fri Feb 27 05:43:38 2009 From: joshuakwood at gmail.com (JK Wood) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:43:38 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal of SBU marker in README's In-Reply-To: <20090226231145.364546ec@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> <20090226231145.364546ec@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <6b6812630902262143o786c2d48q332c6c1bbfa666b8@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Robby Workman wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:52:58 -0600 > Vincent Batts wrote: > > > In the same fashion of the Linux-From-Scratch guide, what are > > everyone's idea on having a baseline package build time marked as the > > Single Build Unit (SBU). some package of consensus, and included in > > the README's could have in SBU's the relative build time of their > > SlackBuild. for example if libsndfile takes 4 minutes to build on > > your machine, that would be 1 SBU for you. therefore qt4 would be 45 > > SBU's and ipcalc would be < 1 SBU > > > > this is an idea that would provide more foresight to the prospective > > builders of any given SBo. > > > Hrm, I don't know. > > On one hand, it would certainly be useful information to have, but at > the same time, it's error prone -- either the data is very subjective > (i.e. "that took forever") or it requires the submitter to time every > build they run and compare it against some "standard" build. > > Besides, something like this would take all the fun out of comparing > build times -- there would be this boring "<1SBU" or "10SBU" or > "400SBU" instead of "faster than a fifteen year old boy's first time > with Eliza Dushku" or "this thing takes a metric assload of time to > build" > > -RW > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > I think that the metric buttload is a very useful unit of time when expressing things like these. --JK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chaos.proton at gmail.com Fri Feb 27 06:39:17 2009 From: chaos.proton at gmail.com (Grissiom) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:39:17 +0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Bug in submit page? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, all, It's not a bug of slackbuilds but slackbuilds.org. When I submitting a package, I noticed the submission page rendered weird in firefox. Here is the screen shot: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/q8NlYX9sQWJSsD8c5eg1OQ?feat=directlink -- Cheers, Grissiom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From elyk03 at gmail.com Fri Feb 27 07:01:44 2009 From: elyk03 at gmail.com (Kyle Guinn) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:01:44 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal of SBU marker in README's In-Reply-To: <6b6812630902262143o786c2d48q332c6c1bbfa666b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> <20090226231145.364546ec@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <6b6812630902262143o786c2d48q332c6c1bbfa666b8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2dcaacad0902262301l27c6a67fmc15d6c89c3f03c0e@mail.gmail.com> On 2/26/09, JK Wood wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Robby Workman > wrote: > > Besides, something like this would take all the fun out of comparing > > build times -- there would be this boring "<1SBU" or "10SBU" or > > "400SBU" instead of "faster than a fifteen year old boy's first time > > with Eliza Dushku" or "this thing takes a metric assload of time to > > build" > > > > I think that the metric buttload is a very useful unit of time when > expressing things like these. > Yes, we should all use the metric system for this. It's well suited for those types of unit conversions. -Kyle From me at alkos333.net Fri Feb 27 14:14:03 2009 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:14:03 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Proposal of SBU marker in README's In-Reply-To: <2dcaacad0902262301l27c6a67fmc15d6c89c3f03c0e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2015330f0902262052g6b66bbc2od65a5179c1762729@mail.gmail.com> <20090226231145.364546ec@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <6b6812630902262143o786c2d48q332c6c1bbfa666b8@mail.gmail.com> <2dcaacad0902262301l27c6a67fmc15d6c89c3f03c0e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Kyle Guinn wrote: > Yes, we should all use the metric system for this. ?It's well suited > for those types of unit conversions. SlackBuilds.org - teaching the metric system in U.S. :P -- Fran Lebowitz - "You're only has good as your last haircut." From erik at slackbuilds.org Fri Feb 27 15:09:23 2009 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:09:23 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Bug in submit page? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090227090923.6b605816@shaggy.scooby> On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Grissiom wrote: > Hi, all, > > It's not a bug of slackbuilds but slackbuilds.org. When I submitting a > package, I noticed the submission page rendered weird in firefox. Here is > the screen shot: > > http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/q8NlYX9sQWJSsD8c5eg1OQ?feat=directlink I can't reproduce this and have had no other complaints. It looks like a font size issue. Possibly you need to reset the zoom (View> Zoom> Reset) in FF or turn down the minimum font size. -- Erik Hanson http://slackbuilds.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: