[Slackbuilds-users] Opera / Update

[emmel]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:34:47AM +0800, vvoody wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org>wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:02:24 +0200
> > emmel <the_emmel at gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Just wanted to mention: 10.61 is out. Or should I mail
> > > that directly to the maintainer?
> >
> >
> > Probably it should go to MAINTAINER, but since that's me,
> > I suppose it doesn't matter either way.  :-)  The update
> > has been submitted...
> >
> >
> > > Anyway, I was wondering why we are still repacking
> > > the RPM and not use the .tar.bz2...
> >
> >
> > Write a build script for tar.bz2, and then compare the
> > number of lines and amount of complexity relative to the
> > one for the rpm.  You'll have your answer then :-)

You have a point there. Although the install script could probably put
to use, I don't see me disecting it any time soon. ;-)

> Agree with RW. Since 10.50 build 6252, Opera has changed its packaging way.

I noticed...

> FYI
> http://my.opera.com/ruario/blog/new-opera-unix-packages-arrive-deb-rpm-tar

Thanks.
-- 
emmel <the_emmel at gmx.net>
GPG signed
Fingerprint: 60B4 D8E3 9617 900C 6726  168F D677 5AAD D40F CCE7
Certserver : hkp://pgp.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20100823/2ef412b4/attachment.sig>