[Slackbuilds-users] Is the default ARCH=i486

Matthew Fillpot mfilpot at gmail.com
Wed Jan 27 04:11:33 UTC 2010


On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Keith Richie <disturbed1976 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Matthew Fillpot <mfilpot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Keith Richie <disturbed1976 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is there a standard that the default arch should be i486? I raised an
>>> issue to the Sbopkg team about exporting ARCH=i486 as I recently came
>>> across 2 packages which have the arch set to x86_64 (quesoglc and
>>> warzone2100). http://code.google.com/p/sbopkg/issues/detail?id=37 .
>>> Quesoglc compiles and installs, but because the libs end up in the
>>> wrong location, Warzone fails to build.
>>>
>>> There's also a similar thread at linuxquestions.org
>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/issues-installing-warzone-2100-759560/#post3798462
>>>
>>> The applications in question are not x86_64 only, and do build
>>> correctly when the arch is set to i486 for 32bit machines.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>>> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>>> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>>> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My apologies for those builds, which are mine. I seem to have forgot
>> to change it back to 486 after testing it on x86_64. When you
>> encountered the issue with the Quesoglc was that because you did not
>> change the architecture on the slackbuild file?
>>
>> Also, should I submit new builds for these two with that line
>> corrected or can someone at SBo make those simple corrections for me?
>>
>> --
>> -Thank You,
>> -Matthew Fillpot
>> _______________________________________________
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>>
>>
>
> No problem. I was hoping since it's a simple edit a member of the team
> could handle it.
>
> I was using Sbopkg, and queued up a few items for our newly acquired
> 32bit machines. Once I edited the SlackBuild all was fine. They build
> one x86_64 without problems.
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>

This was a good prompt for me to check the rest of my builds, in which
only the two you listed were effected. I am building a script on my
system to auto-check and clean that line if necessary before they are
archived so it won't happen again.

-- 
-Thank You,
-Matthew Fillpot


More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list