[Slackbuilds-users] mercurial repositry

Mon Feb 21 17:56:40 UTC 2011

Unfortunately Google Code doesn't have built-in support to download the
source as a tarball (like SF.net does).  There's an issue for this,
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=810 so if you're
interested you should star it - but otherwise the issue is locked so you
can't add comments.  I created
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=5006 as an alternative
that summarizes the SF.net/ViewVC feature.

<http://about.me/schultzter>

2011/2/19 <slackbuilds-users-request at slackbuilds.org>

> Send SlackBuilds-users mailing list submissions to
>        slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        slackbuilds-users-request at slackbuilds.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        slackbuilds-users-owner at slackbuilds.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SlackBuilds-users digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Dangling postgresql source pointer (Donald Allen)
>   2. autonomous remove from pending (Matteo Bernardini)
>   3. Re: autonomous remove from pending (David Woodfall)
>   4. @vvoody ????????? http://bit.ly/2hIFEW;-) (vvoody)
>   5. Re: @vvoody ????????? http://bit.ly/2hIFEW;-) (Robby Workman)
>   6. Re: mercurial repositry (crocket)
>   7. Re: mercurial repositry (Tim Dickson)
>   8. Re: lshw: compilation fails (Yudha H Tejaningrat)
>   9. drbd vs. drbd-tools (Greg' Ar Tourter)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Donald Allen <donaldcallen at gmail.com>
> To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:59:37 -0500
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Dangling postgresql source pointer
> The link
>
> ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v9.0.1/postgresql-9.0.1.tar.bz2
>
> to the source on the page
>
> http://slackbuilds.org/repository/13.1/system/postgresql/
>
> does not work; the v9.0.1 directory no longer exists. v9.0.2 and
> v9.0.3 are available.
>
> /Don
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Matteo Bernardini <matteo.bernardini at gmail.com>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:20:43 +0100
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] autonomous remove from pending
> thanks people for the possibility of removing things from pending. :)
>
> To tell the truth, I was getting afraid of submitting too early and having
> to bother people 5 mins later.
>
> I already tested it with the audacity tarball :D
>
> Matteo
>
> P.S. I submitted also menu-cache, libfm and pcmanfm: Chris asked me to
> carry on maintaing them, and I gladly agreed :)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Woodfall <dave at dawoodfall.net>
> To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:32:38 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] autonomous remove from pending
> On (20:20 10/02/11), Matteo Bernardini <matteo.bernardini at gmail.com> put
> forth the proposition:
>
>> thanks people for the possibility of removing things from pending. :)
>>
>
> Yeah nice touch and will save time for the admins who get constant
> calls for removing stuff *cough* ;)
>
>
>> To tell the truth, I was getting afraid of submitting too early and having
>> to bother people 5 mins later.
>>
>> I already tested it with the audacity tarball :D
>>
>> Matteo
>>
>> P.S. I submitted also menu-cache, libfm and pcmanfm: Chris asked me to
>> carry on maintaing them, and I gladly agreed :)
>> _______________________________________________
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>>
>
> --
> Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: vvoody <wxj.g.sh at gmail.com>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:49:42 +0100
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] @vvoody 麻烦看一下这个帖子 http://bit.ly/2hIFEW;-)
>
> @vvoody 麻烦看一下这个帖子 http://bit.ly/2hIFEW;-)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:19:26 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] @vvoody 麻烦看一下这个帖子 http://bit.ly/2hIFEW;-)
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:49:42 +0100
> vvoody <wxj.g.sh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > @vvoody 麻烦看一下这个帖子 http://LINKBROKEN_bit.ly/2hIFEW;-)
>
>
> You have been placed on moderated status due to sending spam
> to the list.  I realize that *you* didn't send it, but you
> need to fix your account - probably your gmail account has
> somehow been hijacked and is spamming your address book.
>
> -RW
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: crocket <crockabiscuit at yahoo.com>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:45:20 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] mercurial repositry
> I dealt with this issue.
> I downloaded the source code from mercurial repository, removed
> unneccesary files and directories, and archived the source in tar.bz2.
> I uploaded the archived source to my google code project website.
> Googlecode provides up to gigabytes.
> This way, you can make sure people always get the same source code.
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Tim Dickson <dickson.tim at googlemail.com>
> To: SlackBuilds.org Users List <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Sent: Tue, February 8, 2011 6:30:22 PM
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] mercurial repositry
>
> hi all, I am creating a slackbuild for a project where the source is only
> available as a mecurial repo. on googlecode.com
> It is easy enough to get (the source), but is not accessible directly by
> http or
>
> ftp, and is just the source itself, not a gzipped tar of the source.
>
> any suggestions?
> thanks, Tim
>
> PS. source can be got with something like..
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tim Dickson <dickson.tim at googlemail.com>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:36 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] mercurial repositry
> Thanks. I'll see if the dev will upload a "release version" tar.gz source.
>
> Tim
>
> On 15/02/2011 05:45, crocket wrote:
>
>> I dealt with this issue.
>> I downloaded the source code from mercurial repository, removed
>> unneccesary files and directories, and archived the source in tar.bz2.
>> I uploaded the archived source to my google code project website.
>> Googlecode provides up to gigabytes.
>> This way, you can make sure people always get the same source code.
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Tim Dickson<dickson.tim at googlemail.com>
>> To: SlackBuilds.org Users List<slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
>> Sent: Tue, February 8, 2011 6:30:22 PM
>> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] mercurial repositry
>>
>> hi all, I am creating a slackbuild for a project where the source is only
>> available as a mecurial repo. on googlecode.com
>> It is easy enough to get (the source), but is not accessible directly by
>> http or
>>
>> ftp, and is just the source itself, not a gzipped tar of the source.
>>
>> any suggestions?
>> thanks, Tim
>>
>> PS. source can be got with something like..
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Yudha H Tejaningrat <yht at slackware-id.org>
> To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 05:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] lshw: compilation fails
> Glenn Becker <burningc at ...> writes:
>
> > scsi.cc:845:74: error: cannot call constructor 'hwNode::hwNode' directly
> > scsi.cc:845:74: error:   for a function-style cast, remove the redundant
> > '::hwNode'
>
> Patch : http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=227169
>
> >
> > +-----------------------------------------------------+
> > Glenn Becker - burningc at ...
> > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
> > +-----------------------------------------------------+
> >
>
>
> Yudha H Tejaningrat
> http://yht.web.id
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Greg' Ar Tourter" <artourter at gmail.com>
> To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:17:29 +0000
> Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] drbd vs. drbd-tools
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be an inconsistency between the website and repository
> for the drbd package.
> The repository has the package called drbd-tools (there used to be two
> packages, drbd-kernel and drbd-tools, for slack13.0 before drbd became
> part of the vanilla kernel) and it is called only drbd in the website.
>
> The source these days is simply called drbd so I suspect that's what
> the SBo package should be called but either would probably be fine as
> long as it is consistent.
>
> Cheers
>
> ArTourter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20110221/b5eca97c/attachment-0001.html>