[Slackbuilds-users] murmur SlackBuild

[James Geboski]

Hello,

No worries about the delay.  I personally, find it more useful to have them
split into two packages.  Reason being, I do not have any of the
X libraries on the servers I am running murmur on.  And on the client end,
you really don't need murmur.  If anyone has any objections to this, please
inform me.

Also, I'd find it "cleaner" to have /var/{lib,log,run}/mumble-server
renamed to /var/{lib,log,run}/murmur.  This way it matches the naming of
rc.murmur and murmurd.  However, people would not really be able upgrade
the package if this was implemented.  Would this be a forbidden to do in
the SlackBuild?

James

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:17 PM, <adev at linuxmail.org> wrote:

> I apologize for the delay in response. I'm no longer maintaining murmur, I
> was under the impression that mumble would be packaged with murmur as they
> both already share the same source tarball. Anyway, I'm forwarding this to
> the SBo mailing list as I am granting you permission to take over
> maintenance of murmur.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: James Geboski
>
> Sent: 02/13/12 03:46 PM
>
> To: adev at linuxmail.org
>
> Subject: murmur SlackBuild
>
>  Hello there,
>
>  I don't know if murmur SlackBuild has just been forgotten about or what
> but, there is now version 1.2.3.
>
>  All that really needs to be added to the SlackBuild are some config
> options: no-ice, no-bonjour.  I have attached a patch if you're interested
> in that.
>
>  Also, if you're not up for continuing the maintenance on this SlackBuild
> anymore, I'd be willing to maintain the build script.
>
>  James
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20120225/7a3ca3d1/attachment.html>