From cricketc at gmail.com Fri Nov 2 00:54:32 2012 From: cricketc at gmail.com (Ben) Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libreoffice 3.6.3? Message-ID: <509319C8.8070607@gmail.com> Looks like libreoffice 3.6.3 has just been released, but sbo still has 3.6.1 (which doesn't work because the link was changed). Any plans to update? Thanks, -Ben From info at microlinux.fr Fri Nov 2 06:13:47 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:13:47 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't compile Squid Message-ID: <5093649B.8010002@microlinux.fr> Hi, I'm currently upgrading our school's server (running Squid and SquidGuard) from Slackware 13.37 to 14.0. Unfortunately Squid fails to build. The compilation exits with the following error messages (which I paste as a whole, since I don't quite understand what's happening): --8<------------------------------------------------------- g++: warning: switch '-fhuge-objects' is no longer supported libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include -I../../src -I../../include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -fhuge-objects -D_REENTRANT -O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686 -MT StringData.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/StringData.Tpo -c StringData.cc -o StringData.o >/dev/null 2>&1 mv -f .deps/StringData.Tpo .deps/StringData.Plo /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include -I../../src -I../../include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -fhuge-objects -D_REENTRANT -O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686 -MT Time.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Time.Tpo -c -o Time.lo Time.cc libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include -I../../src -I../../include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -fhuge-objects -D_REENTRANT -O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686 -MT Time.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Time.Tpo -c Time.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Time.o g++: warning: switch '-fhuge-objects' is no longer supported libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include -I../../src -I../../include -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -fhuge-objects -D_REENTRANT -O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686 -MT Time.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Time.Tpo -c Time.cc -o Time.o >/dev/null 2>&1 make[3]: *** [Time.lo] Erreur 1 --8<------------------------------------------------------- This is a server with a stock Slackware 14.0 install. I only left out groups [E], [T], [KDE], [KDEI], [XAP] and [XFCE], as usual on a server. Now what can a poor boy do? Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From Hullen at t-online.de Fri Nov 2 07:22:00 2012 From: Hullen at t-online.de (Helmut Hullen) Date: 02 Nov 2012 08:22:00 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't compile Squid In-Reply-To: <5093649B.8010002@microlinux.fr> Message-ID: Hallo, Niki, Du meintest am 02.11.12: > I'm currently upgrading our school's server (running Squid and > SquidGuard) from Slackware 13.37 to 14.0. > Unfortunately Squid fails to build. The compilation exits with the > following error messages (which I paste as a whole, since I don't > quite understand what's happening): > --8<------------------------------------------------------- > g++: warning: switch '-fhuge-objects' is no longer supported > libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../include [...] I've compiled Squid-3.2.3, seems to run without problems. Compiling options: Squid Cache: Version 3.2.3 configure options: '--prefix=/usr' '--libdir=/usr/lib' '--sysconfdir=/ etc/squid' '--localstatedir=/var/log/squid' '--datadir=/usr/share/squid' '--with-pidfile=/var/run/squid' '--mandir=/usr/man' '--with-logdir=/var/ log/squid' '--enable-snmp' '--enable-auth' '--enable-basic-auth' '-- enable-auth-digest' '--enable-linux-netfilter' '--enable-async-io' '-- enable-ssl' '--build=i486-slackware-linux' '--disable-strict-error- checking' 'build_alias=i486-slackware-linux' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i486 - mtune=i686' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -march=i486 -mtune=i686' 'PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/ usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig' As you can see: few changes in the script from David Somero: --enable-auth --enable-basic-auth --enable-auth-digest makes helpers etc. for all possibilities (see the output of "configure --help") and --enable-ssl seems to be forgotten. I use "heimdal-1.5.1" too. ----------------------------- I've used the packet http://slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/14.0/network/squid.tar.gz from http://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.0/network/squid/ That leads to http://arktur.shuttle.de/CD/5.4/slack/n1/squid-3.2.3-i486-3hln.tgz Viele Gruesse! Helmut From info at microlinux.fr Fri Nov 2 07:48:13 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:48:13 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Can't compile Squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50937ABD.10007@microlinux.fr> Le 02/11/2012 08:22, Helmut Hullen a ?crit : > I've compiled Squid-3.2.3, seems to run without problems. > Thanks for your suggestions! In the meantime I experimented a bit, and I found out that going back one version from 3.1.20 to 3.1.19 solves the problem. I'll take a better look as soon as I find some time, but unfortunately the server must be finished this weekend, since work starts on monday. Quick & dirty in the meantime. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From klaatu at straightedgelinux.com Fri Nov 2 13:12:03 2012 From: klaatu at straightedgelinux.com (Klaatu) Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 09:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] sport, yet another SBo front-end Message-ID: <12306566.3zZcdP6tKp@slackk> Hi everyone. I wrote a simple shell script that I call "sport" (Slack PORTs) which seeks to emulate the process and feel of BSD Ports (minus BSD Port's annoying habit of auto depency resolution, thankyouverymuch). So basically, it's a script that lets you crawl through your "port" tree (or SBo tree, in this case), research what a SlackBuild requires for installation, and then build and install. There's a pretty good walkthrough here: http://slackermedia.info/sport It is not so great at bulk installs the way sbopkg is, but I find it convenient in some use cases. I've been using it for about two weeks now, as I re-build my 13.37 systems to 14, and it's been fun. If you want to try it out for yourself, please feel free to clone: http://gitorious.org/slackport Bug fixes or cool BASH tips are always welcome. - klaatu From c.willing at uq.edu.au Sun Nov 4 05:34:43 2012 From: c.willing at uq.edu.au (Christoph Willing) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:34:43 +1000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] update-mosquitto Message-ID: When the rest period ends in favour of the daily grind again, an update to system/mosquitto is available at: https://github.com/cwilling/slackbuilds/tree/update-mosquitto The update incorporates an upstream bug fix release, as well as fixing a small but significant typo in the mosquito.SlackBuild. chris From bocke at mycity.rs Sun Nov 4 08:10:00 2012 From: bocke at mycity.rs (Bojan Popovic) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 09:10:00 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] gvolwheel and qtfm updates Message-ID: <20121104091000.5d65353e@deathstar.universe.uni> Hi, I know the upload form is currently disabled but tought to try sending you the patches against the main git branch. I was also wondering if anyone would accept new packages into his branch? Or you're not allowed (or don't want to) to talk about additions until the "D Day". :) Cheers, Bojan. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: qtfm-5.3_to_5.5.diff.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 667 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: gvolwheel-0.7_to_1.0.diff.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1164 bytes Desc: not available URL: From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sun Nov 4 15:36:16 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 201211104 Message-ID: <201211041036.17317.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Sun Nov 4 15:41:50 UTC 2012 academic/maxima: Updated for version 5.27.0. academic/smath-studio: Updated for version 0.95.4594. audio/alsa-tools: Updated for version 1.0.26.1. audio/cd-discid: Updated for version 1.3.1. audio/gmpc-plugins: Fixed homepage. audio/gmpc: Fixed homepage. audio/lv2dynparam1: Fixed download link. audio/lxmusic: Noted the xmms2 dependency in REQUIRES. audio/mac: Fixed download link. audio/zynjacku: Fixed download link. business/gnucash: Changed optional dep. from webkit to webkitgtk. desktop/enlightenment: Updated for version 0.16.999.76819. desktop/gtk-kde4: Updated for version 0.9.5, mark as unmaintained. desktop/razorqt: Updated for version 0.5.1. desktop/root-tail: Fixed download link. desktop/vwm: Fixed download link and forced -j1. desktop/x-tile: Updated for version 2.5. development/apache-maven: Fixed download. development/blassic: Fixed download link. development/django: Fixed download link. development/dpkg: Updated for version 1.16.8. development/gprolog: Fixed download link. development/jdk: Updated for version 7u9 development/premake: Added lua to REQUIRES. development/tkcvs: Fixed download link. development/trac: Fixed download link. development/xtruss: Updated for version r9490. games/abuse: Fixed download link. games/fortune_firefly: Fixed download link. graphics/gimp-registry-plugins: Updated Smart Sep. Sharpen filter. graphics/picasa: Removed (no linux support anymore). graphics/teighafileconverter: Updated for version 3.7.0. graphics/teighaviewer: Updated for version 3.7.0. libraries/alsa-plugins: Updated for version 1.0.26. libraries/argparse: Removed. libraries/dietlibc: Fixed download link. libraries/e_dbus: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/ecore: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/edje: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/eet: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/eeze: Removed at request of maintainer. libraries/efreet: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/eina: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/embryo: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/evas: Updated for version 1.7.0. libraries/fltk2: Fixed download link. libraries/gssdp: Updated for version 0.12.2.1. libraries/libdockapp: Fixed download link. libraries/libedit: Fixed download link. libraries/libmikmod: Updated for version 3.2.0. libraries/libpseudo: Fixed download link. libraries/libstatgrab: Added (system statistics library). libraries/libva: Fixed download link and homepage. libraries/libviper: Fixed download link. libraries/ocaml-camomile: Added a patch to install a missing lib. libraries/qt3: Fixed build (removed invalid hunk from patch) libraries/vdpau-video: Fixed download link and md5sum. libraries/xalan: Fixed download link. libraries/yajl: Updated for version 2.0.4. misc/rsibreak: Fixed download link. multimedia/exaile: Don't note webkit as optional dependency. multimedia/mediatomb: Fix building with libmp4v2. multimedia/rosa-media-player: Fixed download link. multimedia/wxcam: Added xvidcore to REQUIRES. network/C-IP2Location: New upstream tarball for the same version. network/clamav-unofficial-sigs: Fixed download link. network/claws-mail-extra-plugins: Small README change. network/exim: Updated for version 4.80.1. network/flvstreamer: Fixed download link. network/hamachi: Fixed download links. network/httping: Updated for version 1.5.4. network/maildrop: Fixed download link. network/modsecurity-apache: Updated for version 2.6.8. network/mysecureshell: Updated for version 1.25. network/nikto: Fixed download link. network/ntop: Fix dependency list in .info file network/pdnsd: Fixed download link and homepage. network/quassel: Don't note webkit as optional dependency. network/sparkleshare: Fixed download link and md5sum. network/ttdnsd: Fixed download link. network/ucspi-ssl: Fixed download link. network/xl2tpd: Fixed download link. office/hevea: Fixed download link. office/texlive: Add a note re obtaining svn checkout python/pystatsd: Fixed dep info. python/python-oauth2: Added distribute to REQUIRES. python/python-openid: Fixed download link. python/pyutil: Fixed dep info. python/tweepy: Added distribute to REQUIRES. ruby/rubygems-update: Fixed .info file. system/acpitool: Updated for version 0.5.1, cleanups. system/apache-cassandra: Fixed download link. system/apache-tomcat: Fix default java options. system/bulk_extractor: Updated for version 1.3. system/clamav: Fixed logging location of freshclam in rc.clamav. system/dstat: Updated for version 0.7.2. system/gparted: Updated for version 0.14.0. system/ipheth-pair: Removed (sources no more available). system/ksplice: Fixed download link. system/microcode_ctl: Fixed download link. system/pigz: Updated for version 2.2.5. +--------------------------+ From matejek.martin at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 16:32:58 2012 From: matejek.martin at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIE1hdMSbamVr?=) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:32:58 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libreoffice 3.6.3? (SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 78, Issue 1) In-Reply-To: <509319C8.8070607@gmail.com> References: <509319C8.8070607@gmail.com> Message-ID: <509698BA.8040905@gmail.com> Dne 2.11.2012 01:54, Ben napsal(a): > Looks like libreoffice 3.6.3 has just been released, but sbo still has > 3.6.1 (which doesn't work because the link was changed). Any plans to > update? > > Thanks, > -Ben > > I'm not a maintainer of that SlackBuild, but I may have solution for this. As it's stated at Slackbuild page, LibreOffice moves old-stable releases to /old directory at their FTP (beware that not every mirror does this) including stable releases. Only with slight change in version numbers. Stable releases have versions like 3.6.3 and release candidate versions adds suffix (RC number) like 3.6.3.2. Which is in fact the same release. Maybe simple change in URL from /libreoffice/stable/$VERSION to /libreoffice/old/$VERSION.$RC would solve the problem. Martin From mherda at slackword.net Sun Nov 4 17:34:42 2012 From: mherda at slackword.net (Marcin Herda) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:34:42 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates enquiry Message-ID: <5096A732.7000100@slackword.net> Hi there, First of all, thank you all for great work and another set of wonderful updates. My questions is related to the submission procedure at the moment. According to the slackbuilds.org website: /"Submissions are still closed. We'd like to rest a bit before we hit the daily grind again... /" ... which obviously is understandable as the SlackBuilds team are only human beings and need to rest from time to time:). For that reason I have been waiting with my updates (both bug fixes and version updates) for the submissions to be officially open. With yet another set of updates, I've started wondering if I've missed something? Are the submissions open now? Thank you for clarification. Kindest regards Marcin Herda -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sun Nov 4 19:47:03 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates enquiry In-Reply-To: <5096A732.7000100@slackword.net> References: <5096A732.7000100@slackword.net> Message-ID: <201211041447.04290.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> On Sunday 04 November 2012 12:34:42 Marcin Herda wrote: > Hi there, > > First of all, thank you all for great work and another set of wonderful > updates. > > My questions is related to the submission procedure at the moment. > According to the slackbuilds.org website: > > /"Submissions are still closed. We'd like to rest a bit before we hit > the daily grind again... /" > > ... which obviously is understandable as the SlackBuilds team are only > human beings and need to rest from time to time:). For that reason I > have been waiting with my updates (both bug fixes and version updates) > for the submissions to be officially open. With yet another set of > updates, I've started wondering if I've missed something? Are the > submissions open now? > > Thank you for clarification. > > Kindest regards > Marcin Herda No you have not missed anything, even though we are taking a break we are still fixing bits and pieces. Submissions will be opened soon. As a reminder to all maintainers ALL submissions MUST be based off the latest approved copy from our repo, this includes README, *.info, and slack-desc files. --dsomero From cricketc at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 22:23:45 2012 From: cricketc at gmail.com (Ben) Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libreoffice 3.6.3? (SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 78, Issue 1) In-Reply-To: <509698BA.8040905@gmail.com> References: <509319C8.8070607@gmail.com> <509698BA.8040905@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5096EAF1.7030506@gmail.com> On 11/04/2012 11:32 AM, Martin Mat?jek wrote: > Dne 2.11.2012 01:54, Ben napsal(a): >> Looks like libreoffice 3.6.3 has just been released, but sbo still has >> 3.6.1 (which doesn't work because the link was changed). Any plans to >> update? > > I'm not a maintainer of that SlackBuild, but I may have solution for > this. As it's stated at Slackbuild page, LibreOffice moves old-stable > releases to /old directory at their FTP (beware that not every mirror > does this) including stable releases. Only with slight change in version > numbers. Stable releases have versions like 3.6.3 and release candidate > versions adds suffix (RC number) like 3.6.3.2. Which is in fact the same > release. > Maybe simple change in URL from /libreoffice/stable/$VERSION to > /libreoffice/old/$VERSION.$RC would solve the problem. Thanks Martin. I actually ended up downloading the latest 3.6.3 package and changing the version number in the scripts, and that worked fine. -Ben From niels.horn at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 23:42:45 2012 From: niels.horn at gmail.com (Niels Horn) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 21:42:45 -0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] libreoffice 3.6.3? (SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 78, Issue 1) In-Reply-To: <5096EAF1.7030506@gmail.com> References: <509319C8.8070607@gmail.com> <509698BA.8040905@gmail.com> <5096EAF1.7030506@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Ben wrote: > On 11/04/2012 11:32 AM, Martin Mat?jek wrote: >> >> Dne 2.11.2012 01:54, Ben napsal(a): >>> >>> Looks like libreoffice 3.6.3 has just been released, but sbo still has >>> 3.6.1 (which doesn't work because the link was changed). Any plans to >>> update? >> >> >> I'm not a maintainer of that SlackBuild, but I may have solution for >> this. As it's stated at Slackbuild page, LibreOffice moves old-stable >> releases to /old directory at their FTP (beware that not every mirror >> does this) including stable releases. Only with slight change in version >> numbers. Stable releases have versions like 3.6.3 and release candidate >> versions adds suffix (RC number) like 3.6.3.2. Which is in fact the same >> release. >> Maybe simple change in URL from /libreoffice/stable/$VERSION to >> /libreoffice/old/$VERSION.$RC would solve the problem. > > > Thanks Martin. I actually ended up downloading the latest 3.6.3 package and > changing the version number in the scripts, and that worked fine. > > -Ben > Hi, I'm the maintainer of that script, but hopelessly without time at the moment. I'll try to push an updated version soonish, but won't even promise a date for that... -- Niels Horn From rshepard at appl-ecosys.com Sun Nov 4 23:53:01 2012 From: rshepard at appl-ecosys.com (Rich Shepard) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 15:53:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Scribus-1.4.1 Released Message-ID: I downloaded the 1.4.1 source and tried building it by changing the version number in the 1.4.0 script, but the build failed: Scribus/cmake/modules/SCRIBUSQTConfig.cmake ./scribus.SlackBuild: line 68: cd: scribus-1.4.1: No such file or directory I use scribus _very_ infrequently so I don't need to upgrade but if the maintainer can get the new version running when he has time that would be nice. Rich From mario at slackverse.org Mon Nov 5 15:26:17 2012 From: mario at slackverse.org (Mario) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:26:17 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] mod_fastcgi.Slackbuild Message-ID: <5097DA99.1060503@slackverse.org> I used SB from 13.37 tree and added fixes to build on 14.0, patch can be found here: http://devel.slackverse.org/patches/slackbuilds.org/mod_fastcgi.diff Regards, mario From mherda at slackword.net Mon Nov 5 21:29:18 2012 From: mherda at slackword.net (Marcin Herda) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:29:18 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates enquiry In-Reply-To: <201211041447.04290.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> References: <5096A732.7000100@slackword.net> <201211041447.04290.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Message-ID: <50982FAE.9060604@slackword.net> On 04/11/12 19:47, xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org wrote: > On Sunday 04 November 2012 12:34:42 Marcin Herda wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> First of all, thank you all for great work and another set of wonderful >> updates. >> >> My questions is related to the submission procedure at the moment. >> According to the slackbuilds.org website: >> >> /"Submissions are still closed. We'd like to rest a bit before we hit >> the daily grind again... /" >> >> ... which obviously is understandable as the SlackBuilds team are only >> human beings and need to rest from time to time:). For that reason I >> have been waiting with my updates (both bug fixes and version updates) >> for the submissions to be officially open. With yet another set of >> updates, I've started wondering if I've missed something? Are the >> submissions open now? >> >> Thank you for clarification. >> >> Kindest regards >> Marcin Herda > No you have not missed anything, even though we are taking a break > we are still fixing bits and pieces. Submissions will be opened soon. > > As a reminder to all maintainers ALL submissions MUST be based off > the latest approved copy from our repo, this includes README, *.info, > and slack-desc files. > > --dsomero > > Hi there, Thanks for your reply. Looks like Slackers never stop working, even when having a break:) I can see that yajl has been updated. It was actually one of the updates that I had prepared. Looking forward to the opening of a new Slack season. Regards Marcin -- -- sycamorex From mario at slackverse.org Mon Nov 5 22:46:51 2012 From: mario at slackverse.org (Mario) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:46:51 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] icecast/nrpe/nsca/roxterm updates Message-ID: <509841DB.1050901@slackverse.org> I bumped up versions for the above mentioned SB's because it has been a while since they came out. Patches, if needed, are here: http://devel.slackverse.org/patches/slackbuilds.org/icecast.diff http://devel.slackverse.org/patches/slackbuilds.org/nrpe.diff http://devel.slackverse.org/patches/slackbuilds.org/nsca.diff http://devel.slackverse.org/patches/slackbuilds.org/roxterm.diff Regards, mario From mario at slackverse.org Mon Nov 5 23:22:33 2012 From: mario at slackverse.org (Mario) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:22:33 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ocaml-findlib missing dependancy Message-ID: <50984A39.3020805@slackverse.org> This should do the trick: REQUIRES="ocaml" Regards, mario From lawrence.mcdonald at vodamail.co.za Tue Nov 6 07:41:31 2012 From: lawrence.mcdonald at vodamail.co.za (lawrence.mcdonald at vodamail.co.za) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:41:31 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ocaml-findlib missing dependancy Message-ID: <1721399152-1352187900-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-454568783-@b26.c15.bise7.blackberry> ------Original Message------ From: Mario Sender: slackbuilds-users-bounces at slackbuilds.org To: SlackBuilds.org List ReplyTo: SlackBuilds.org Users List Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ocaml-findlib missing dependancy Sent: Nov 6, 2012 01:22 This should do the trick: REQUIRES="ocaml" Regards, mario _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! From xavier at maillard.im Tue Nov 6 08:22:11 2012 From: xavier at maillard.im (Xavier Maillard) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:22:11 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] icecast/nrpe/nsca/roxterm updates In-Reply-To: <509841DB.1050901@slackverse.org> (message from Mario on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:46:51 +0100) References: <509841DB.1050901@slackverse.org> Message-ID: <201211060822.qA68MBNv016822@kcals.intra.maillard.im> Hi Mario, thank you very much for your patches. Why don't you just hold these patches inside a Git repository ? Regards Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From mario at slackverse.org Tue Nov 6 10:53:07 2012 From: mario at slackverse.org (Mario) Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:53:07 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] icecast/nrpe/nsca/roxterm updates In-Reply-To: <201211060822.qA68MBNv016822@kcals.intra.maillard.im> References: <509841DB.1050901@slackverse.org> <201211060822.qA68MBNv016822@kcals.intra.maillard.im> Message-ID: <5098EC13.5080903@slackverse.org> On 11/06/2012 09:22 AM, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Hi Mario, > > thank you very much for your patches. Why don't you just hold > these patches inside a Git repository ? > > Regards > Xavier > That is the idea, I will put up a git server soon, but for now it is what it is :^) Regards, mario From j at dawnrazor.net Thu Nov 8 10:31:47 2012 From: j at dawnrazor.net (J) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:31:47 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] download/tar discrepancies in several SBos Message-ID: <20121108043147.Horde.85hoZ4gBVY5Qm4oTgZcxNlw@mail.dawnrazor.net> while running an audit of DOWNLOAD bits in .info files compared to tar lines in .SlackBuilds, I found several cases where there are discrepancies between the file that is downloaded and the file that the SlackBuild tries to decompress. this kills the SlackBuild: /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.info: DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/mozilla/doctorjs/tarball/69588ab /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.SlackBuild: SRCNAM=mozilla-doctorjs SRCNAMSUF=69588ab $SRCNAM-$SRCNAMSUF.tar.gz /usr/sbo/libraries/liblrdf/liblrdf.info: DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/swh/LRDF/tarball/0.5.0 /usr/sbo/libraries/liblrdf/liblrdf.SlackBuild: VERSION=0.5.0 swh-LRDF-$VERSION-0-g7ebc032.tar.gz /usr/sbo/development/casperjs/casperjs.info: DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/n1k0/casperjs/tarball/1.0.0-RC1 /usr/sbo/development/casperjs/casperjs.SlackBuild: PRGNAM=casperjs n1k0-$PRGNAM-1.0.0-RC1-0-g5428865.tar.gz /usr/sbo/network/offlineimap/offlineimap.info: DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/tarball/v6.4.0 /usr/sbo/network/offlineimap/offlineimap.SlackBuild: SRCNAM=nicolas33-offlineimap-v6.4.0-0-gc1120c9 $SRCNAM.tar.gz /usr/sbo/graphics/fbpic/fbpic.info: DOWNLOAD=http://keithhedger.hostingsiteforfree.com/zips/fbpic.tgz /usr/sbo/graphics/fbpic/fbpic.SlackBuild: PRGNAM=fbpic VERSION=0.0.2 $PRGNAM-$VERSION.tgz attached is the perl script I used to generate this list. it's messe, its parser is incomplete and so it likely fails to find some discrepancies, it outputs excess info, and it has at least one obvious bug. but it is able to find the above issues. Thanks, J -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: find_dl_issues.pl Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2773 bytes Desc: not available URL: From audrius at neutrino.lt Thu Nov 8 11:59:44 2012 From: audrius at neutrino.lt (Audrius =?utf-8?Q?Ka=C5=BEukauskas?=) Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:59:44 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] download/tar discrepancies in several SBos In-Reply-To: <20121108043147.Horde.85hoZ4gBVY5Qm4oTgZcxNlw@mail.dawnrazor.net> References: <20121108043147.Horde.85hoZ4gBVY5Qm4oTgZcxNlw@mail.dawnrazor.net> Message-ID: <20121108115944.GB3306@kiras> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 04:31:47 -0600, J wrote: > while running an audit of DOWNLOAD bits in .info files compared to > tar lines in .SlackBuilds, I found several cases where there are > discrepancies between the file that is downloaded and the file that > the SlackBuild tries to decompress. this kills the SlackBuild: > > /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.info: > DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/mozilla/doctorjs/tarball/69588ab > > /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.SlackBuild: > SRCNAM=mozilla-doctorjs > SRCNAMSUF=69588ab > $SRCNAM-$SRCNAMSUF.tar.gz If you are running your script against SBo tree for 14.0, you might want to purge it from stale SlackBuilds, as the one above was removed. -- Audrius Ka?ukauskas http://neutrino.lt/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From j at dawnrazor.net Thu Nov 8 12:44:05 2012 From: j at dawnrazor.net (J) Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:44:05 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] download/tar discrepancies in several SBos In-Reply-To: <20121108115944.GB3306@kiras> References: <20121108043147.Horde.85hoZ4gBVY5Qm4oTgZcxNlw@mail.dawnrazor.net> <20121108115944.GB3306@kiras> Message-ID: <20121108064405.Horde.EJ0QKIgBVY5Qm6kV7_lRNk4@mail.dawnrazor.net> Ah, right you are and thank you for pointing that out. J Quoting Audrius Ka?ukauskas : > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 04:31:47 -0600, J wrote: >> while running an audit of DOWNLOAD bits in .info files compared to >> tar lines in .SlackBuilds, I found several cases where there are >> discrepancies between the file that is downloaded and the file that >> the SlackBuild tries to decompress. this kills the SlackBuild: >> >> /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.info: >> DOWNLOAD=https://github.com/mozilla/doctorjs/tarball/69588ab >> >> /usr/sbo/development/jsctags/jsctags.SlackBuild: >> SRCNAM=mozilla-doctorjs >> SRCNAMSUF=69588ab >> $SRCNAM-$SRCNAMSUF.tar.gz > > If you are running your script against SBo tree for 14.0, you might want > to purge it from stale SlackBuilds, as the one above was removed. > > -- > Audrius Ka?ukauskas > http://neutrino.lt/ From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Fri Nov 9 18:15:03 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?T3phbiBUw7xya3nEsWxtYXo=?=) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 23:15:03 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [PATCH] system/prelink: Version Bump Message-ID: system/prelink: Version Bump Signed-off-by: Ozan T?rky?lmaz --- system/prelink/prelink.SlackBuild | 4 ++-- system/prelink/prelink.info | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/system/prelink/prelink.SlackBuild b/system/prelink/prelink.SlackBuild index 06d2473..3a2b0f2 100644 --- a/system/prelink/prelink.SlackBuild +++ b/system/prelink/prelink.SlackBuild @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ # ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. PRGNAM=prelink -VERSION=${VERSION:-20100106} -BUILD=${BUILD:-3} +VERSION=${VERSION:-20111012} +BUILD=${BUILD:-1} TAG=${TAG:-_SBo} if [ -z "$ARCH" ]; then diff --git a/system/prelink/prelink.info b/system/prelink/prelink.info index 4d04322..996c6bb 100644 --- a/system/prelink/prelink.info +++ b/system/prelink/prelink.info @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ PRGNAM="prelink" -VERSION="20100106" +VERSION="20111012" HOMEPAGE="http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink/" -DOWNLOAD="http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink/prelink-20100106.tar.bz2" -MD5SUM="56e2a1b5a478795352bf6e4d2bc6e0ab" +DOWNLOAD="http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink/prelink-20111012.tar.bz2" +MD5SUM="f5aaf347432d677c293e5e3399ba4fdf" DOWNLOAD_x86_64="" MD5SUM_x86_64="" REQUIRES="" -- 1.7.12.1 From willysr at gmail.com Sun Nov 11 01:04:07 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:04:07 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] network/filezilla: Upgraded to 3.6.0 Message-ID: Hi, Since submission is not yet open, i would like to update my own package in SBo: FileZilla Attached is the patch to update to 3.6.0 which has just been released no changes required to build this version except for the VERSION -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-network-filezilla-Upgraded-to-3.6.0.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1404 bytes Desc: not available URL: From andreas at andreasvoegele.com Mon Nov 5 06:43:01 2012 From: andreas at andreasvoegele.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_V=F6gele?=) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:43:01 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] abcde slackbuild a little dated? In-Reply-To: References: <20121028080451.GA2367@skamandros.andrews-corner.org> <1373858.2U43tU7YH6@callisto> Message-ID: <50975FF5.3010906@andreasvoegele.com> On 28.10.2012 19:25, Glenn Becker wrote: > > Hi Heinz, > >> Robby is a bit busy lately so he probably missed them. You can send >> them to me >> (or one of the other admins) instead and we'll make sure they get updated >> asap. > > Here are the files for abcde [...] The included cddb-tool passes the option "-a" to the mail command when sending a CDDB file in order to set the message's content type to UTF-8. Slackware's Heirloom mailx uses the option "-a" for something else. On Slackware, the message's content type will be set automatically if the locale is properly set, e.g. to "en_US.UTF-8". See the section "Character sets" in the mailx manual page for details. -------------- next part -------------- --- cddb-tool.orig 2012-06-20 15:44:13.000000000 +0200 +++ cddb-tool 2012-11-05 07:27:16.000000000 +0100 @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ ADDRESS="$2" DISCID=$(grep ^DISCID= "$FILE" | cut -f2 -d= | tr -d \[:cntrl:\]) CDDBGENRE=$(grep '^#CATEGORY=' "$FILE" | cut -f2- -d= | tr -d \[:cntrl:\]) - grep -v "^#CATEGORY=" "$FILE" | iconv -t utf-8 | mail -a "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8" -s "cddb $CDDBGENRE $DISCID" "$ADDRESS" + grep -v "^#CATEGORY=" "$FILE" | iconv -t utf-8 | mailx -s "cddb $CDDBGENRE $DISCID" "$ADDRESS" ;; query) # cddb-tool query serverurl proto user host discid... From ldkraemer at gmail.com Sun Nov 11 21:24:24 2012 From: ldkraemer at gmail.com (Larry Kraemer) Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:24:24 -0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Error when using F1 for HELP in Dia 0.97.2 Message-ID: I've installed Dia Diagram Editor 0.97.2 in Slackware 14. When I use the F1 Key for Help I get the following error message: Could not open help directory: Error opening directory '/usr/share/dia/help': No such file or directory How does the file help get installed to /usr/share/dia ???? I installed from www.SlackBuilds.org for Version 14 of Slackware. Thanks. Larry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From burningc at SDF.ORG Mon Nov 12 00:57:29 2012 From: burningc at SDF.ORG (Glenn Becker) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:57:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] abcde slackbuild a little dated? In-Reply-To: <50975FF5.3010906@andreasvoegele.com> References: <20121028080451.GA2367@skamandros.andrews-corner.org> <1373858.2U43tU7YH6@callisto> <50975FF5.3010906@andreasvoegele.com> Message-ID: >> Here are the files for abcde [...] > > The included cddb-tool passes the option "-a" to the mail command when > sending a CDDB file in order to set the message's content type to UTF-8. > Slackware's Heirloom mailx uses the option "-a" for something else. On > Slackware, the message's content type will be set automatically if the > locale is properly set, e.g. to "en_US.UTF-8". See the section > "Character sets" in the mailx manual page for details. Thanks for this. I have meant to get these packages done but have had lots of life issues (old, sick pets, etc) intervening. All: if my delays become unreasonable please let me know and I will hand off the packages (abcde and cd-discid). I am not intentionally dragging my heels, I've just been swamped, and not in a good way. Thanks, /Glenn +---------------------------------------------+ Glenn Becker - burningc at sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org +---------------------------------------------+ From asamardzic at gmail.com Tue Nov 13 17:00:17 2012 From: asamardzic at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Aleksandar_Samard=C5=BEi=C4=87?=) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:00:17 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] submission not accepted as "package in pending queue", but not listed in /pending Message-ID: Just uploaded updated SlackBuilds for Enlightenment window manager, and corresponding dependencies. There is a new dependency introduced recently, and that's "eio" library; however, when I tried to upload corresponding archive through submission form, the forms replied that: File exists; a submission by the name 'eio' is already pending approval. However, the package is not listed under slackbuilds.org/pending. About month ago, I sent updated SlackBuilds, after previous upstream release, to Erik (through e-mail as submission form was closed at that time). Seems to me that these updates eventually found its way into the repo, but that eio is not (yet) put there... In any case, I'm attaching latest version of SlackBuild for eio - this one should be put into the repo, as it refers to current latest upstream version. Regards, Alex -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: eio.tar.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1818 bytes Desc: not available URL: From erik at slackbuilds.org Tue Nov 13 17:56:31 2012 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:56:31 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] submission not accepted as "package in pending queue", but not listed in /pending In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121113115631.00bdb1a1@shaggy.doo> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:00:17 +0100 Aleksandar Samard?i? wrote: > File exists; a submission by the name 'eio' is already pending approval. Please submit it now, thanks. -- Erik Hanson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From asamardzic at gmail.com Tue Nov 13 18:46:03 2012 From: asamardzic at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Aleksandar_Samard=C5=BEi=C4=87?=) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:46:03 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] submission not accepted as "package in pending queue", but not listed in /pending In-Reply-To: <20121113115631.00bdb1a1@shaggy.doo> References: <20121113115631.00bdb1a1@shaggy.doo> Message-ID: On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Erik Hanson wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:00:17 +0100 > Aleksandar Samard?i? wrote: > >> File exists; a submission by the name 'eio' is already pending approval. > > Please submit it now, thanks. > Done, thanks. Regards, Alex From occam at internode.on.net Wed Nov 14 02:28:58 2012 From: occam at internode.on.net (occam) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:28:58 +1100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg depends on texi2html? Message-ID: <50A301EA.5000805@internode.on.net> What have I missed, or is the SB text for ffmpeg incomplete? Trying to build ffmpeg (to be used in Digikam), I was stopped by this error message: bash-4.2# sh ffmpeg.SlackBuild Could not find texi2html! Please make sure to have tetex or texlive installed and that texi2html is in PATH. From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 02:37:36 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?T3phbiBUw7xya3nEsWxtYXo=?=) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:37:36 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg depends on texi2html? In-Reply-To: <50A301EA.5000805@internode.on.net> References: <50A301EA.5000805@internode.on.net> Message-ID: 2012/11/14 occam : > What have I missed, or is the SB text for ffmpeg incomplete? > Trying to build ffmpeg (to be used in Digikam), I was stopped by this error > message: > > bash-4.2# sh ffmpeg.SlackBuild > Could not find texi2html! Please make sure to have tetex or texlive > installed > and that texi2html is in PATH. Anwser is in the FAQ: http://slackbuilds.org/faq/#su 22 - I'm trying to build ffmpeg (or maybe something else), and the script keeps erroring out due to a missing /usr/man directory (or maybe missing tetex binaries that are installed). What gives? You probably don't have the tetex binaries in PATH. See the relevant section of our HOWTO page. in short: use su - -- Ozan, BSc, BEng From occam at internode.on.net Wed Nov 14 02:48:42 2012 From: occam at internode.on.net (occam) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:48:42 +1100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg depends on texi2html? In-Reply-To: References: <50A301EA.5000805@internode.on.net> Message-ID: <50A3068A.7030100@internode.on.net> On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Ozan T?rky?lmaz wrote: > 2012/11/14 occam : >> What have I missed, or is the SB text for ffmpeg incomplete? >> Trying to build ffmpeg (to be used in Digikam), I was stopped by this error >> message: >> >> bash-4.2# sh ffmpeg.SlackBuild >> Could not find texi2html! Please make sure to have tetex or texlive >> installed >> and that texi2html is in PATH. > Anwser is in the FAQ: > http://slackbuilds.org/faq/#su > 22 - I'm trying to build ffmpeg (or maybe something else), and the > script keeps erroring out due to a missing /usr/man directory (or > maybe missing tetex binaries that are installed). What gives? > You probably don't have the tetex binaries in PATH. See the relevant > section of our HOWTO page. > > in short: use su - > > No, I do not have the tetex binaries installed at all. So tetex is a required package? I believe I did a 'standard' Slack 14 installation (too lazy to select/deselect packages or groups..) but when checking I found that tetex packages were included in 13.37 - but not in 14 From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 02:53:48 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?T3phbiBUw7xya3nEsWxtYXo=?=) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:53:48 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg depends on texi2html? In-Reply-To: <50A3068A.7030100@internode.on.net> References: <50A301EA.5000805@internode.on.net> <50A3068A.7030100@internode.on.net> Message-ID: 2012/11/14 occam : > On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Ozan T?rky?lmaz wrote: >> >> 2012/11/14 occam : >>> >>> What have I missed, or is the SB text for ffmpeg incomplete? >>> Trying to build ffmpeg (to be used in Digikam), I was stopped by this >>> error >>> message: >>> >>> bash-4.2# sh ffmpeg.SlackBuild >>> Could not find texi2html! Please make sure to have tetex or texlive >>> installed >>> and that texi2html is in PATH. >> >> Anwser is in the FAQ: >> http://slackbuilds.org/faq/#su >> 22 - I'm trying to build ffmpeg (or maybe something else), and the >> script keeps erroring out due to a missing /usr/man directory (or >> maybe missing tetex binaries that are installed). What gives? >> You probably don't have the tetex binaries in PATH. See the relevant >> section of our HOWTO page. >> >> in short: use su - >> >> > No, I do not have the tetex binaries installed at all. So tetex is a > required package? > I believe I did a 'standard' Slack 14 installation (too lazy to > select/deselect packages or groups..) but when checking I found that tetex > packages were included in 13.37 - but not in 14 http://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-14.0/slackware/t/ It's still included. -- Ozan, BSc, BEng From melikamp at melikamp.com Tue Nov 13 20:40:15 2012 From: melikamp at melikamp.com (Ivan Zaigralin) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request Message-ID: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> How about a variable in .info which identifies the type of license(s) used in the package to be built? Something like LICENSE="free"|"non-free" or FREE_SOFTWARE="true"|"false" where "free" would indicate that the package only contains free software. The inclusion of this variable can be made optional. This will be transparent to those who want to keep using Slackbuilds the same way as before, but it will also provide utility to everyone. With only a modest effort from each maintainer, every user will be able to quickly check the license type of a package without chasing down the sources. Moreover, automated license management will become possible. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 897 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 03:54:29 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:54:29 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone have a minute or two to give me a push in the right direction? Message-ID: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> Hi gang, I asked this on the LQ website, but nobody had any answers. Hopefully someone here will have a spare moment to help me figure out what I can do to fix this hiccup. I'm trying to make a slackbuild for an app that has a requirement. The requirement is fltk 1.3. I have fltk 1.3 installed, but because it's named 'fltk13-config', the ./configure of the app source craps out because it's looking for 'fltk-config'. In the slackbuild of the app, I simply don't know how or where to change it so it will look for and use the 'fltk13-config' instead of 'fltk-config'. Should it be somewhere in this section of the slackbuild?: CFLAGS="$SLKCFLAGS" \ CXXFLAGS="$SLKCFLAGS" \ ./configure \ --enable-ssl \ --prefix=/usr \ --libdir=/usr/lib/${LIBDIRSUFFIX} \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --localstatedir=/var \ --mandir=/usr/man \ --docdir=/usr/doc/$PRGNAM-$VERSION \ --build=$ARCH-slackware-linux I'm not a programmer or anything like that but I can usually figure out enough to make a slackbuild work if I look at different other slackbuilds, but this one has me stumped. I'd like to build this slackbuild so that I can ask the maintainer of the app that requires this if I can take over maintenance, since the app that's on slackbuilds.org is pretty old. To clarify a little more...there is no fltk-config, but that is what the app's ./configure is looking for, yet the app itself *requires* fltk 1.3 (the config is looking for version(s) *lower* that 1.3), that's why I'm trying to figure out how to have the slackbuild use the fltk13-config that is installed from the fltk 1.3. Surely there's a way to tell the app's ./configure to use the fltk13-config instead of looking for fltk-config. I just don't know how to write that into the slackbuild. The app, by the way, is Dillo. -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From erik at slackbuilds.org Wed Nov 14 04:06:23 2012 From: erik at slackbuilds.org (Erik Hanson) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:06:23 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone have a minute or two to give me a push in the right direction? In-Reply-To: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121113220623.1d012c4c@shaggy.doo> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:54:29 -0600 wrote: > In the slackbuild of the app, I simply don't know how or where to change it so > it will look for and use the 'fltk13-config' instead of 'fltk-config'. I think you might be able to solve this with: sed -i 's/fltk-config/fltk13-config/g' configure.in autoreconf -- Erik Hanson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ppetrov at mail.student.oulu.fi Wed Nov 14 09:10:07 2012 From: ppetrov at mail.student.oulu.fi (Petar Petrov) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:10:07 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> Message-ID: <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> Quoting Ivan Zaigralin : > How about a variable in .info which identifies the type of license(s) used > in the package to be built? Something like > > LICENSE="free"|"non-free" > > or > > FREE_SOFTWARE="true"|"false" > > where "free" would indicate that the package only contains free software. > The inclusion of this variable can be made optional. > > This will be transparent to those who want to keep using Slackbuilds the > same way as before, but it will also provide utility to everyone. With > only a modest effort from each maintainer, every user will be able to quickly > check the license type of a package without chasing down the > sources. Moreover, > automated license management will become possible. > > Hi License management? Do we really need this? Isn't this going to make things more complicated, unnecessarily? I may sound lazy and selfish, but I do not want to have to check a yet another thing before i submit a SlackBuild. If some software requires registration or has something "special" about it's license, couldn't this be listed in the README? -petar From rudsonalves at yahoo.com.br Wed Nov 14 11:33:44 2012 From: rudsonalves at yahoo.com.br (rudsonalves) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:33:44 -0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Eric bug fix and upgrade to last version Message-ID: <50A38198.6030107@yahoo.com.br> Hi, Bug fix in eric4.desktop to find image eric4.png in python2.7 subdirectory. Thanks to Larry Kraemer. By, Rudson R. Alves -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: eric.tar.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 51216 bytes Desc: not available URL: From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 14:01:56 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:01:56 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone have a minute or two to give me a push in the right direction? In-Reply-To: <20121113220623.1d012c4c@shaggy.doo> References: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> <20121113220623.1d012c4c@shaggy.doo> Message-ID: <20121114080156.5d41436e@oogah.boogah.org> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:06:23 -0600 Erik Hanson wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:54:29 -0600 > wrote: > > > In the slackbuild of the app, I simply don't know how or where to change it > > so it will look for and use the 'fltk13-config' instead of 'fltk-config'. > > I think you might be able to solve this with: > > sed -i 's/fltk-config/fltk13-config/g' configure.in > autoreconf > > Thanks, Erik. That seemed to work and it built. I did see a couple of things though as it was building that haven't been in there before. Are these anything to worry about? This: /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_IMLIB /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: or see http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Extending-aclocal -and this: config.status: executing depfiles commands (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/SBo/dillo-3.0.2/missing --run autoheader) rm -f stamp-h1 touch config.h.in make all-recursive -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 15:32:10 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ozan_T=C3=BCrky=C4=B1lmaz?=) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:32:10 +0500 (AQTT) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone have a minute or two to give me a push in the right direction? In-Reply-To: <20121114080156.5d41436e@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> <20121113220623.1d012c4c@shaggy.doo> <20121114080156.5d41436e@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, insomniactoo at localnet.com wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:06:23 -0600 > Erik Hanson wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:54:29 -0600 > > wrote: > > > > > In the slackbuild of the app, I simply don't know how or where to change it > > > so it will look for and use the 'fltk13-config' instead of 'fltk-config'. > > > > I think you might be able to solve this with: > > > > sed -i 's/fltk-config/fltk13-config/g' configure.in > > autoreconf > > > > > > Thanks, Erik. > > That seemed to work and it built. I did see a couple of things though as it > was building that haven't been in there before. Are these anything to worry > about? This: > > /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_IMLIB > /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: or see > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Extending-aclocal > That's nothing to worry about unless you want to fix the warning in the config system. > -and this: > > config.status: executing depfiles commands > (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/SBo/dillo-3.0.2/missing > --run autoheader) rm -f stamp-h1 > touch config.h.in > make all-recursive > That looks like how dillo gets build. Ozan, BSc, BEng From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 17:05:13 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:05:13 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone have a minute or two to give me a push in the right direction? In-Reply-To: References: <20121113215429.5e4b880f@oogah.boogah.org> <20121113220623.1d012c4c@shaggy.doo> <20121114080156.5d41436e@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121114110513.0bfe28da@oogah.boogah.org> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:32:10 +0500 (AQTT) "Ozan T?rky?lmaz" wrote: > > > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, insomniactoo at localnet.com wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:06:23 -0600 > > Erik Hanson wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:54:29 -0600 > > > wrote: > > > > > > > In the slackbuild of the app, I simply don't know how or where to > > > > change it so it will look for and use the 'fltk13-config' instead of > > > > 'fltk-config'. > > > > > > I think you might be able to solve this with: > > > > > > sed -i 's/fltk-config/fltk13-config/g' configure.in > > > autoreconf > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Erik. > > > > That seemed to work and it built. I did see a couple of things though as > > it was building that haven't been in there before. Are these anything to > > worry about? This: > > > > /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of > > AM_PATH_IMLIB /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: run info > > '(automake)Extending aclocal' /usr/share/aclocal/imlib.m4:9: or see > > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#Extending-aclocal > > > > That's nothing to worry about unless you want to fix the warning in the > config system. > > > -and this: > > > > config.status: executing depfiles commands > > (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/SBo/dillo-3.0.2/missing > > --run autoheader) rm -f stamp-h1 > > touch config.h.in > > make all-recursive > > > > That looks like how dillo gets build. > > Ozan, BSc, BEng > Great! Thank you, Ozan and Erik for all your help. It looks like I may get permission from the original maintainer of Dillo to take over. Once I hear back from him again with a yea or nay, I'll announce it on the list here and send in the build. -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 17:10:03 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:10:03 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A quick question about the app.info file... Message-ID: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> At the line where it says 'REQUIRES="%README%"', am I to put the requirements in the actual README file or am I to substitute the "%README%" with the requirement(s)? John -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 17:18:07 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ozan_T=C3=BCrky=C4=B1lmaz?=) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:18:07 +0500 (AQTT) Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A quick question about the app.info file... In-Reply-To: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, insomniactoo at localnet.com wrote: > > At the line where it says 'REQUIRES="%README%"', am I to put the requirements > in the actual README file or am I to substitute the "%README%" with the > requirement(s)? > > > John > > > Read README and then put names of requrements as stated in README. Mainly you places requirements' package names (requirtments that are not already in Stock Slackware) as listed in SBo. Ozan, BSc, BEng From pfeifer.felix at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 17:11:13 2012 From: pfeifer.felix at gmail.com (Felix Pfeifer) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:11:13 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A quick question about the app.info file... In-Reply-To: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: > At the line where it says 'REQUIRES="%README%"', am I to put the requirements > in the actual README file or am I to substitute the "%README%" with the > requirement(s)? > > > John Hi John, the latter, substitute the "%README%" with the requirements. Felix From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 17:55:53 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:55:53 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A quick question about the app.info file... In-Reply-To: References: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121114115553.15a8c3a4@oogah.boogah.org> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:18:07 +0500 (AQTT) "Ozan T?rky?lmaz" wrote: > On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, insomniactoo at localnet.com wrote: > > > > > At the line where it says 'REQUIRES="%README%"', am I to put the > > requirements in the actual README file or am I to substitute the "%README%" > > with the requirement(s)? > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > Read README and then put names of requrements as stated in README. Mainly > you places requirements' package names (requirtments that are not already > in Stock Slackware) as listed in SBo. > > > Ozan, BSc, BEng > Got it. Thanks again. John -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From korgie at gmail.com Wed Nov 14 17:49:51 2012 From: korgie at gmail.com (korgman) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:49:51 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Aeolus.info DOWNLOAD fix (add \) Message-ID: <50A3D9BF.6020808@gmail.com> Please add '\' in aeolus.info. Section DOWNLOAD DOWNLOAD="http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/aeolus-0.8.4.tar.bz2 http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/stops-0.3.0.tar.bz2" fix: DOWNLOAD="http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/aeolus-0.8.4.tar.bz2 \ http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/stops-0.3.0.tar.bz2" Kudos to dsomero for merging stops. Thanks pdi@*.gr for the report. -- Michales Michaloudes From insomniactoo at localnet.com Wed Nov 14 21:17:44 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:17:44 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Got permission... Message-ID: <20121114151744.3c4196a5@oogah.boogah.org> I received permission from the former maintainer (Thank you Mikhail!) of Dillo to take over maintenance. I'll submit it as soon as I send this post to the list. John -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From xavier at maillard.im Wed Nov 14 22:43:47 2012 From: xavier at maillard.im (Xavier Maillard) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:43:47 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> (message from Petar Petrov on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:10:07 +0200) References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> Message-ID: <201211142243.qAEMhlEa016297@kcals.intra.maillard.im> Hi, > License management? Do we really need this? Isn't this going to make > things more complicated, unnecessarily? I may sound lazy and selfish, > but I do not want to have to check a yet another thing before i submit > a SlackBuild. If some software requires registration or has something > "special" about it's license, couldn't this be listed in the README? I do agree. SlackBuilds are meant to be simple things. It is going to be a mess with dep tracking, license and stuff like that. Slackware does not care much about license AFAICS. P.S: I am also lazy ;) Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From c.willing at uq.edu.au Wed Nov 14 23:32:30 2012 From: c.willing at uq.edu.au (Christoph Willing) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:32:30 +1000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <201211142243.qAEMhlEa016297@kcals.intra.maillard.im> References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> <201211142243.qAEMhlEa016297@kcals.intra.maillard.im> Message-ID: <3EEA0426-9783-4A8A-AC83-531475111032@uq.edu.au> On 15/11/2012, at 8:43 AM, Xavier Maillard wrote: > Hi, > >> License management? Do we really need this? Isn't this going to make >> things more complicated, unnecessarily? I may sound lazy and selfish, >> but I do not want to have to check a yet another thing before i submit >> a SlackBuild. If some software requires registration or has something >> "special" about it's license, couldn't this be listed in the README? > > I do agree. SlackBuilds are meant to be simple things. It is > going to be a mess with dep tracking, license and stuff like > that. > > Slackware does not care much about license AFAICS. Quite separately from the proposal for a new LICENSE field, I don't think that that last statement is true. A possible contra example; you may have noticed that SL-14.0 doesn't provide jre/jdk packages containing reconstituted upstream binaries as was previously the case. I presume this is because of the widespread doubts about the legality of binary redistribution under upstream's java licence. chris > P.S: I am also lazy ;) > > Xavier > -- > http://www.gnu.org > http://www.april.org > http://www.lolica.org > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > From melikamp at melikamp.com Wed Nov 14 17:31:24 2012 From: melikamp at melikamp.com (Ivan Zaigralin) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> Message-ID: <50A3D56C.2020201@melikamp.com> On 11/14/2012 04:10 AM, Petar Petrov wrote: > Quoting Ivan Zaigralin : > >> How about a variable in .info which identifies the type of license(s) used >> in the package to be built? Something like >> >> LICENSE="free"|"non-free" >> >> or >> >> FREE_SOFTWARE="true"|"false" >> >> where "free" would indicate that the package only contains free software. >> The inclusion of this variable can be made optional. >> >> This will be transparent to those who want to keep using Slackbuilds the >> same way as before, but it will also provide utility to everyone. With only >> a modest effort from each maintainer, every user will be able to quickly >> check the license type of a package without chasing down the sources. >> Moreover, automated license management will become possible. > > Hi > > License management? Do we really need this? It is a very useful feature, especially in a commercial environment, where running afoul of a license can cost users a lot. > Isn't this going to make things more complicated, unnecessarily? I may sound > lazy and selfish, but I do not want to have to check a yet another thing > before i submit a SlackBuild. Like I said, let's make it optional. Then you won't have to bother. Or may be someone else will review the license and let you know, sparing you from the extra work. Not a lot of software goes from free to non-free or vice versa, so the amount of effort required to keep this up to date will be truly tiny. > If some software requires registration or has something "special" about it's > license, couldn't this be listed in the README? This would not be an improvement over putting the license(s) into the doc dir, which is mostly done already. In particular, it does nothing to help automation. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 897 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 02:43:00 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:43:00 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <50A3D56C.2020201@melikamp.com> References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> <50A3D56C.2020201@melikamp.com> Message-ID: In a commercial environment, one shouldn't just install stuff willy nilly anyway without checking the "source" package. License info is there, whether xGPL, MIT, etc or proprietary. Even some "free" OSS licenses might need special care before installing. Java is in that realm as the license is for the end user and not software distributors. Either way, license management should be the resposibility of the end user and not SBo as no sources are hosted on SBo. -Ed On 11/14/12, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: > On 11/14/2012 04:10 AM, Petar Petrov wrote: >> Quoting Ivan Zaigralin : >> >>> How about a variable in .info which identifies the type of license(s) >>> used >>> in the package to be built? Something like >>> >>> LICENSE="free"|"non-free" >>> >>> or >>> >>> FREE_SOFTWARE="true"|"false" >>> >>> where "free" would indicate that the package only contains free software. >>> >>> The inclusion of this variable can be made optional. >>> >>> This will be transparent to those who want to keep using Slackbuilds the >>> >>> same way as before, but it will also provide utility to everyone. With >>> only >>> a modest effort from each maintainer, every user will be able to quickly >>> >>> check the license type of a package without chasing down the sources. >>> Moreover, automated license management will become possible. >> >> Hi >> >> License management? Do we really need this? > > It is a very useful feature, especially in a commercial environment, where > running afoul of a license can cost users a lot. > >> Isn't this going to make things more complicated, unnecessarily? I may >> sound >> lazy and selfish, but I do not want to have to check a yet another thing >> before i submit a SlackBuild. > > Like I said, let's make it optional. Then you won't have to bother. Or may > be > someone else will review the license and let you know, sparing you from the > extra work. Not a lot of software goes from free to non-free or vice versa, > so the amount of effort required to keep this up to date will be truly > tiny. > >> If some software requires registration or has something "special" about >> it's >> license, couldn't this be listed in the README? > > This would not be an improvement over putting the license(s) into the doc > dir, > which is mostly done already. In particular, it does nothing to help > automation. > > -- Sent from my mobile device You! What PLANET is this! -- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0 From crockabiscuit at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 04:18:36 2012 From: crockabiscuit at gmail.com (crocket) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:18:36 +0900 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request Message-ID: I think there should be OPTIONAL= field in .info Having REQUIRED is not enough. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Thu Nov 15 05:01:36 2012 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:01:36 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests Message-ID: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> I'm basically on hiatus right now until we finish home construction, but I feel the need to disseminate a totally non-binding yet strong opinion about feature requests for the .info files: Off is the general direction in which you can fuck. In our internal discussions about adding REQUIRES, one of the most frequent concerns was "feature creep," i.e. "if we do that, then people are going to want $whatever." Seriously - just stop. Sure, a lot of things would be nice to have - there's no technical reason that licensing and optional dependencies and Erd?sNumbers of the upstream authors and $DEITY knows what else, but unless you have a REALLY REALLY REALLY convincing case as to why it's superior to what we have now, refer back to the second (one sentence) paragraph. That is all. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Thu Nov 15 05:22:18 2012 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:22:18 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A quick question about the app.info file... In-Reply-To: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121114111003.3fba9fad@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121114232218.07f69339@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 11:10:03 -0600 wrote: > At the line where it says 'REQUIRES="%README%"', am I to put the > requirements in the actual README file or am I to substitute the > "%README%" with the requirement(s)? The git commit that added support for REQUIRES has a bit of an explanation on that: http://slackbuilds.org/cgit/templates/commit/?id=fb892cce15779cbbfb2d7399ca4225c68b2ac43f -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kristofru at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 05:30:02 2012 From: kristofru at gmail.com (Chris Abela) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:30:02 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] My SlackBuild status Message-ID: As I do not follow -current my Slackbuilds could not be updated for a long time, but I managed to catch up and the following is the status of the SlackBuilds that are currently under my maintenance. Naturally I do this on a best effort basis but if you disagree with anything here or you would like to takeover any of the listed applications, please let me know. glpk up-to-date qhull up-to-date knights to be updated - but needs KDE4.9 while Slack 14.0 comes with KDE4.8 dos2unix updated - submitted gcp up-to-date recode up-to-date zyGrib to be updated but needs a qwt update C-IP2Location updated - submitted - will be renamed ip2location-c etherape up-to-date gq up-to-date ipv6calc updated - submitted loic updated - submitted - will be renamed LOIC wput up-to-date xinetd updated - submitted ganttproject up-to-date openproj abandoned burp updated - submitted cronie up-to-date davfs updated - submitted dump updated - submitted vlock up-to-date asterixInspector new submission From kristofru at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 06:04:14 2012 From: kristofru at gmail.com (Chris Abela) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:04:14 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Robby Workman wrote: : > > Off is the general direction in which you can fuck. > > In our internal discussions about adding REQUIRES, one of the most > frequent concerns was "feature creep," i.e. "if we do that, then > people are going to want $whatever." Seriously - just stop. Sure, > a lot of things would be nice to have - there's no technical reason > that licensing and optional dependencies and Erd?sNumbers of the > upstream authors and $DEITY knows what else, but unless you have a > REALLY REALLY REALLY convincing case as to why it's superior to > what we have now, refer back to the second (one sentence) paragraph. > > That is all. > While I think that we could have done without the decorative nature of the language contained in the mail above, I also would not like to see the info file burdened with information of dubious importance. Consider the originally requested LICENSE field. How shall we decide what abides to what and under which definition and by which authority. Writing SlackBuilds is fun because it is not very different from what you would have wanted to to write for your own local system. Therefore the process provides an efficient method on how users may contribute to the "Slackware Experience" without having to go too much out of their way. Let's keep it this way; fun. From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Thu Nov 15 19:21:25 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:21:25 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests In-Reply-To: References: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <50A540B5.1090609@gmail.com> On 11/14/2012 10:04 PM, Chris Abela wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Robby Workman wrote: > : >> Off is the general direction in which you can fuck. >> >> ---snip--- >> That is all. >> > > While I think that we could have done without the decorative nature of > the language contained in the mail above, I also would not like to see > the info file burdened with information of dubious importance. > Consider the originally requested LICENSE field. How shall we decide > what abides to what and under which definition and by which authority. > Writing SlackBuilds is fun because it is not very different from what > you would have wanted to to write for your own local system. Therefore > the process provides an efficient method on how users may contribute > to the "Slackware Experience" without having to go too much out of > their way. Let's keep it this way; fun. > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > I can understand the crankiness (my bathroom remodel is taking ages) even though I don't quite agree with it: this list is after all for a discussion of SBo topics. If the admins don't agree with a request a simple "NO" will suffice. That said, I see no reason to add licensing complexity to SBo. Lets keep it simple and fun. -Ed From klaatu at straightedgelinux.com Thu Nov 15 20:07:09 2012 From: klaatu at straightedgelinux.com (Klaatu) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <50A540B5.1090609@gmail.com> References: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <50A540B5.1090609@gmail.com> Message-ID: <112771949.Dvkkbm8rij@slackk> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:21:25 AM King Beowulf wrote: > On 11/14/2012 10:04 PM, Chris Abela wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Robby Workman wrote: > >> Off is the general direction in which you can fuck. > >> > >> ---snip--- > >> That is all. > > > > While I think that we could have done without the decorative nature of > > the language contained in the mail above, I also would not like to see > > the info file burdened with information of dubious importance. > > Consider the originally requested LICENSE field. How shall we decide > > what abides to what and under which definition and by which authority. > > Writing SlackBuilds is fun because it is not very different from what > > you would have wanted to to write for your own local system. Therefore > > the process provides an efficient method on how users may contribute > > to the "Slackware Experience" without having to go too much out of > > their way. Let's keep it this way; fun. > > _______________________________________________ > > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > I can understand the crankiness (my bathroom remodel is taking ages) > even though I don't quite agree with it: this list is after all for a > discussion of SBo topics. If the admins don't agree with a request a > simple "NO" will suffice. > > That said, I see no reason to add licensing complexity to SBo. Lets > keep it simple and fun. > > -Ed > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ I do agree with RW here. SlackBuilds feels pretty feature-complete to me and sometimes it's better to proclaim that That Which Is Not Broken Shall Not Be Fixed. I didn't always feel that way.... [cue flashback] This past summer we all discussed adding the REQUIRES field to .info, and I myself chimed in, saying that I could follow pre-determined conventions for dependency listings. Turns out, I've come to regret that a little, as I find it belabouring to cat both the .info and README files just to figure out what a pkg needs in order to get installed. I am not all that fond of change in my OS and related toolset. And SBo has become a part of the core OS in my eyes. I'd be happy if we didn't hack on it and complicate it. - klaatu From Manuel.Spam at nurfuerspam.de Thu Nov 15 20:25:55 2012 From: Manuel.Spam at nurfuerspam.de (Manuel Reimer) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:25:55 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <112771949.Dvkkbm8rij@slackk> References: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> <50A540B5.1090609@gmail.com> <112771949.Dvkkbm8rij@slackk> Message-ID: Klaatu wrote: > This past summer we all discussed adding the REQUIRES field to .info, and I > myself chimed in, saying that I could follow pre-determined conventions for > dependency listings. Turns out, I've come to regret that a little, as I find > it belabouring to cat both the .info and README files just to figure out what > a pkg needs in order to get installed. In best case, the content in the README would just be a copy of the REQUIRES line. The real point here would be, that a machine readable REQUIRES field would allow tools like "sbopkg" to fully automatically install the program, you want, even if it has ten or more dependencies. Yours Manuel From insomniactoo at localnet.com Thu Nov 15 21:19:22 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:19:22 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests Message-ID: <20121115151922.7e60122c@oogah.boogah.org> For crying out loud. Let it be already! If someone is going to actually worry about licensing, *THEY* will do the checking of the app to see if it meets their requirements. Why do people keep wanting to fix what ain't broke with more and more crap!? Leave the friggin' .info thing alone already. It works, works well, does what it's supposed to and doesn't *need* anything else done to it! I'm with RW whole-handedly on this! -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From xavier at maillard.im Fri Nov 16 17:00:58 2012 From: xavier at maillard.im (Xavier Maillard) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:00:58 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Feature request In-Reply-To: <3EEA0426-9783-4A8A-AC83-531475111032@uq.edu.au> (message from Christoph Willing on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:32:30 +1000) References: <50A2B02F.2060901@melikamp.com> <20121114111007.co8xcz55wwosk840@webmail.oulu.fi> <201211142243.qAEMhlEa016297@kcals.intra.maillard.im> <3EEA0426-9783-4A8A-AC83-531475111032@uq.edu.au> Message-ID: <201211161700.qAGH0whm001017@kcals.intra.maillard.im> > > Slackware does not care much about license AFAICS. > > I don't think that that last statement is true. A possible > contra example; you may have noticed that SL-14.0 doesn't > provide jre/jdk packages containing reconstituted upstream > binaries as was previously the case. I presume this is because > of the widespread doubts about the legality of binary > redistribution under upstream's java licence. Good point. In fact, what I mean is just that: licensing is not an obsession for slackware; they just do the basic work of respecting license terms and that's all. No debate on the free degree-ness for this or that. Regards Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From xavier at maillard.im Fri Nov 16 17:55:37 2012 From: xavier at maillard.im (Xavier Maillard) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:55:37 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] .info Feature Requests In-Reply-To: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> (message from Robby Workman on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:01:36 -0600) References: <20121114230136.4ac57f28@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: <201211161755.qAGHtb5q003749@kcals.intra.maillard.im> > Off is the general direction in which you can fuck. It could become my signature ;-) Let our slackbuilds live with respect to the "KISS way of life". This is how I like them. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org From insomniactoo at localnet.com Sat Nov 17 00:06:43 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:06:43 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone else having trouble connecting here... Message-ID: <20121116180643.7c687c39@oogah.boogah.org> http://www.beli.ws/apps/emoc/emoc.tar.gz ? I've been trying all day and it simply comes back with 'no such site' type thing (I use seamonkey and firefox and konqueror). All three browsers I have set to 3 minutes to timeout, more than enough to start a download. The maintainer of 'emoc' says he thinks my ISP is messed up or the server "was" down. My ISP doesn't block websites, and I can go anywhere on the 'net I wish, and I've been trying to download that tarball since about 12 noon today, going there approximately every half-hour to give it a try. Sooo...I just need to know if I'm the only person having the trouble or not. John -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From niels.horn at gmail.com Sat Nov 17 00:11:27 2012 From: niels.horn at gmail.com (Niels Horn) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:11:27 -0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone else having trouble connecting here... In-Reply-To: <20121116180643.7c687c39@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121116180643.7c687c39@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: Works fine here. And for these cases, there is: http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com Regards, -- Niels Horn On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > > http://www.beli.ws/apps/emoc/emoc.tar.gz ? > > I've been trying all day and it simply comes back with 'no such site' > type > thing (I use seamonkey and firefox and konqueror). All three browsers I > have > set to 3 minutes to timeout, more than enough to start a download. > > The maintainer of 'emoc' says he thinks my ISP is messed up or the server > "was" down. My ISP doesn't block websites, and I can go anywhere on the > 'net > I wish, and I've been trying to download that tarball since about 12 noon > today, going there approximately every half-hour to give it a try. > > Sooo...I just need to know if I'm the only person having the trouble or > not. > > > John > > -- > FTG FTI FTP > > Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From audrius at neutrino.lt Sat Nov 17 10:31:39 2012 From: audrius at neutrino.lt (Audrius =?utf-8?Q?Ka=C5=BEukauskas?=) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:31:39 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing Message-ID: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> Hello, According to notes in SBo SlackBuild templates, "Public Domain" scripts are no longer allowed: A license is required, and we strongly suggest you use the above BSD/MIT style license. We DO NOT accept "Public Domain" scripts. Public domain is not valid in some countries, and no license is worse than a "bad" license in those countries. This is easily applicable for new SlackBuilds, but what about the ones that were submitted to SBo in the past as "Public Domain" and need an update now? If they also need to be licensed, there are two cases not clear to me: - Scripts that were authored by one person as "Public Domain" and were taken maintenance of by somebody else, and now they have the following note: # Created by Foo # Maintained as of version 1.2.3 by Bar - Scripts that were authored by one person, but were modified by one or more SBo admins and/or somebody else: # Created by Foo # Modified by Bar # Modified by Baz It would be very helpful if admins would clarify how to act in such cases. Thank you. BTW, licensing requirements in should also be updated to reflect these policy changes. -- Audrius Ka?ukauskas http://neutrino.lt/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From insomniactoo at localnet.com Sat Nov 17 12:55:59 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:55:59 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Anyone else having trouble connecting here... In-Reply-To: References: <20121116180643.7c687c39@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121117065559.7d0c3af2@oogah.boogah.org> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:11:27 -0200 Niels Horn wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > > > > > http://www.beli.ws/apps/emoc/emoc.tar.gz ? > > > > I've been trying all day and it simply comes back with 'no such site' > > type > > thing (I use seamonkey and firefox and konqueror). All three browsers I > > have > > set to 3 minutes to timeout, more than enough to start a download. > > > > The maintainer of 'emoc' says he thinks my ISP is messed up or the server > > "was" down. My ISP doesn't block websites, and I can go anywhere on the > > 'net > > I wish, and I've been trying to download that tarball since about 12 noon > > today, going there approximately every half-hour to give it a try. > > > > Sooo...I just need to know if I'm the only person having the trouble or > > not. > > > > > > John > > > > Works fine here. > > And for these cases, there is: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com > > Regards, > > -- > Niels Horn > > Thanks, Niels. That's just weird. I don't think I can remember this ever happening before on any of my systems. Is there something I can check or look into or readjust to make it so I can go to that website? What would happen to have only *one* website not load when I've never had that problem before? John -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From vmj at linuxbox.fi Sun Nov 18 05:12:37 2012 From: vmj at linuxbox.fi (Mikko Varri) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:12:37 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing In-Reply-To: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> References: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> Message-ID: <20121118051237.GO1889@linuxbox.fi> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:31:39PM +0200, Audrius Ka?ukauskas wrote: > > According to notes in SBo SlackBuild templates, "Public Domain" scripts > are no longer allowed: > > A license is required, and we strongly suggest you use the above > BSD/MIT style license. We DO NOT accept "Public Domain" scripts. > Public domain is not valid in some countries, and no license is > worse than a "bad" license in those countries. > > This is easily applicable for new SlackBuilds, but what about the ones > that were submitted to SBo in the past as "Public Domain" and need an > update now? > I went through this last year for the scripts that I maintain (close to a hundred scripts). If the script is public domain, as a maintainer you can do whatever you want with it. You do not have to mention the previous maintainers. But... I did contact all the previous maintainers (those mentioned in the script and those who had touched the script according to git log) and asked whether they want to be mentioned according to the BSD/MIT style. Most of them couldn't care less, so I dropped their names. However, some of them appreciated the gesture and wanted to keep their names in the scripts, so those stayed. Then I created a git branch and changed the license of all the scripts. I didn't do any other updates in that branch. Finally, one of the admins pulled that branch and it was done. -vmj From ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com Sun Nov 18 05:22:09 2012 From: ozan.turkyilmaz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?T3phbiBUw7xya3nEsWxtYXo=?=) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 10:22:09 +0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing In-Reply-To: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> References: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> Message-ID: 2012/11/17 Audrius Ka?ukauskas : > Hello, > > According to notes in SBo SlackBuild templates, "Public Domain" scripts > are no longer allowed: > > A license is required, and we strongly suggest you use the above > BSD/MIT style license. We DO NOT accept "Public Domain" scripts. > Public domain is not valid in some countries, and no license is > worse than a "bad" license in those countries. > I saw this coming when first I wrote ibus-anthy script. At a later update I added this: # This script is in public domain. If this is not legally possible # I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, # unless such conditions are required by law. It's from Wikipedia. They use it for Public Domain works of their own. I don't know if it is acceptable by Admins. Later I moved to BSD/MIT Style licensing. Because any license is better than no license. -- Ozan, BSc, BEng From yalhcru at gmail.com Sun Nov 18 09:25:14 2012 From: yalhcru at gmail.com (B Watson) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing In-Reply-To: References: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> Message-ID: On 11/18/12, Ozan T?rky1lmaz wrote: > Because any license is better than no license. I like the WTFPL myself: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sun Nov 18 12:49:06 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20121118.1 Message-ID: <201211180749.06902.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Sun Nov 18 11:36:25 UTC 2012 audio/mp3splt-gtk: Added --docdir configure parameter. audio/qmmp: Updated for version 0.6.3. desktop/enlightenment: Updated for version 0.17.0_alpha2. development/casperjs: Fix download link. development/gedit: Adjust gconf schema installation. development/phantomjs: Fix gold related build errors. libraries/e_dbus: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/ecore: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/edje: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/eet: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/efreet: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/eina: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/eio: Added. (Enlightenment DR17 I/O Library) libraries/embryo: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/evas: Updated for version 1.7.1. libraries/liblrdf: Fix download link. libraries/libmp3splt: Added --docdir configure parameter. libraries/slv2: Fix dependency information. libraries/stfl: Fixed install directory for python. misc/dos2unix: Updated for version 6.0.2. multimedia/gst-plugins-bad: Note optional dependencies in README. multimedia/gst-plugins-ugly: Note optional dependencies in README. network/knemo: Updated for version 0.7.5. network/qupzilla: Updated for version 1.3.5. perl/perl-Authen-SASL: Updated for version 2.16. python/distribute: Updated for version 0.6.30. +--------------------------+ From crockabiscuit at gmail.com Sun Nov 18 16:50:43 2012 From: crockabiscuit at gmail.com (crocket) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:50:43 +0900 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? Message-ID: If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. Why include only REQUIRED in .info? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willysr at gmail.com Sun Nov 18 18:01:52 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:01:52 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. > > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? > As the name says, optional is not needed to compile the application. It just being used to mention extra packages that can be used by the application to add more features, but optional can be so many of them and we will have the same problems as with other Linux distributions if we want to support it. Suppose you want to install A, but then you see it has optional=" B C D E ... Z" Do you want to install them all? We could leave that to user to find out as they already have the basic application buildable IMHO, adding optional also makes it for the admins to test the packages, because they would have to try every possibility and making sure it doesn't break the main apps... -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sun Nov 18 18:24:19 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201211181324.19760.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> On Sunday 18 November 2012 11:50:43 crocket wrote: > If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. > > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? > In case it is not crystal clear yet, we will not add an OPTIONAL variable EVER. There will not be any changes made to the .info syntax for 14.0 or at any other forseeable Slackware version. --dsomero From info at microlinux.fr Sun Nov 18 18:44:42 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:44:42 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xvid4conf: broken URL Message-ID: <50A92C9A.1000709@microlinux.fr> Hi, The download link for xvid4conf is broken. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From info at microlinux.fr Sun Nov 18 18:50:48 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:50:48 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xvid4conf: broken URL In-Reply-To: <50A92C9A.1000709@microlinux.fr> References: <50A92C9A.1000709@microlinux.fr> Message-ID: <50A92E08.3070202@microlinux.fr> Le 18/11/2012 19:44, Niki Kovacs a ?crit : > Hi, > > The download link for xvid4conf is broken. The domain name has been changed following a debate with the taliban fraction of the Debian maintainers, who judged that the debian-multimedia stuff wasn't worthy of the name "debian". Hence the whole site and all relevant links was renamed from debian-multimedia.org to deb-multimedia.org. Jesus, some days I'm really glad not having to put up with all this stuff under Slackware. Anyway: http://deb-multimedia.org/ it is now. Rest of the link as usual. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From info at microlinux.fr Sun Nov 18 19:12:17 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:12:17 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50A93311.2010805@microlinux.fr> Le 18/11/2012 17:50, crocket a ?crit : > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? Because OPTIONAL is, well, optional :oP Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From carlos at strangeworlds.co.uk Sun Nov 18 21:28:49 2012 From: carlos at strangeworlds.co.uk (Carlos Corbacho) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:28:49 +0000 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] zsnes up for grabs Message-ID: <1726515.1IaWSc5Y37@valkyrie> Hi all, As I hardly ever use a 32 bit platform anymore, I'm not actively maintaining this (it cannot be compiled/ run on x86-64 without multilib). So I'm looking for someone else who's interested in taking over maintainership of it. -Carlos From slackware at caisteal.net Mon Nov 19 18:01:56 2012 From: slackware at caisteal.net (W. D. Milner) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50AA7414.2020608@caisteal.net> On 2012.11.18 12:50, crocket wrote: > If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. > > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? > Well, if something isn't listed as REQUIRED then it is a pretty good indication that it's optional. Why would it need to be stated explicitly? -- W. D. Milner (a.k.a. NyteOwl) Slackware Documentation Project - Editor http://docs.slackware.com/ #slackdos on irc.freenode.net From Hullen at t-online.de Mon Nov 19 21:39:00 2012 From: Hullen at t-online.de (Helmut Hullen) Date: 19 Nov 2012 22:39:00 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hallo, crocket, Du meintest am 19.11.12: > If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? What about OPTIONAL=all Viele Gruesse! Helmut From crockabiscuit at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 12:25:59 2012 From: crockabiscuit at gmail.com (crocket) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:25:59 +0900 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Why don't you add OPTIONAL= field in .info? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oh dear lord. On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:50 AM, crocket wrote: > If .info has REQUIRED, then it is natural to have OPTIONAL=, too. > > Why include only REQUIRED in .info? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wxj.g.sh at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 13:59:55 2012 From: wxj.g.sh at gmail.com (vvoody) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:59:55 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? Message-ID: Hello everyone. I haven't received emails containing submission code for a few months. This time, I intended to use that code to remove a new uploaded build. That's why I am asking. http://slackbuilds.org/remove/ The removal page works. Policy changed? Best regards. -- Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. vvoody -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willysr at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 14:01:44 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:01:44 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Hello everyone. I haven't received emails containing submission code for a > few months. This time, I intended to use that code to remove a new uploaded > build. That's why I am asking. > > http://slackbuilds.org/remove/ The removal page works. Policy changed? Check your SPAM folder mine went there until i moved it back to inbox :) -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com From wxj.g.sh at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 14:04:03 2012 From: wxj.g.sh at gmail.com (vvoody) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:04:03 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > Hello everyone. I haven't received emails containing submission code for > a > > few months. This time, I intended to use that code to remove a new > uploaded > > build. That's why I am asking. > > > > http://slackbuilds.org/remove/ The removal page works. Policy changed? > > Check your SPAM folder > mine went there until i moved it back to inbox :) > > -- > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com > Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -- Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. vvoody -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willysr at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 14:06:40 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:06:40 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( That's strange i did get it now i submitted some updates few days ago and it's all there on my inbox right now -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com From wxj.g.sh at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 20:45:26 2012 From: wxj.g.sh at gmail.com (vvoody) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:26 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Oops... @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just released a new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( > > That's strange > i did get it now > i submitted some updates few days ago and it's all there on my inbox right > now > > -- > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com > Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -- Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. vvoody -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Tue Nov 20 23:25:46 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201211201825.46949.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> On Tuesday 20 November 2012 15:45:26 vvoody wrote: > Oops... > > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just released a > new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > wrote: > > > > Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( > > > > That's strange > > i did get it now > > i submitted some updates few days ago and it's all there on my inbox right > > now > > > > -- > > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Sent you the code. --dsomero From wxj.g.sh at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 23:30:11 2012 From: wxj.g.sh at gmail.com (vvoody) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:30:11 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: <201211201825.46949.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> References: <201211201825.46949.xgizzmo@slackbuilds.org> Message-ID: Thanks. It seems to be in the approved list, can not be removed. On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, wrote: > On Tuesday 20 November 2012 15:45:26 vvoody wrote: > > Oops... > > > > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just released a > > new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( > > > > > > That's strange > > > i did get it now > > > i submitted some updates few days ago and it's all there on my inbox > right > > > now > > > > > > -- > > > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > > > Sent you the code. > > --dsomero > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > -- Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. vvoody -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rworkman at slackbuilds.org Tue Nov 20 23:59:12 2012 From: rworkman at slackbuilds.org (Robby Workman) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:59:12 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121120175912.5d762e6a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:26 +0100 vvoody wrote: > Oops... > > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just > released a new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D Done. -RW -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From wxj.g.sh at gmail.com Wed Nov 21 00:11:47 2012 From: wxj.g.sh at gmail.com (vvoody) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:11:47 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild now? In-Reply-To: <20121120175912.5d762e6a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> References: <20121120175912.5d762e6a@liberty.rlwhome.lan> Message-ID: Thank you, have a nice day :) On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Robby Workman wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:26 +0100 > vvoody wrote: > > > Oops... > > > > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just > > released a new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D > > > Done. > > -RW > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > -- Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. vvoody -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From audrius at neutrino.lt Wed Nov 21 11:25:53 2012 From: audrius at neutrino.lt (Audrius =?utf-8?Q?Ka=C5=BEukauskas?=) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:25:53 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing In-Reply-To: <20121118051237.GO1889@linuxbox.fi> References: <20121117103139.GA2519@kiras> <20121118051237.GO1889@linuxbox.fi> Message-ID: <20121121112553.GA1875@kiras> On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 07:12:37 +0200, Mikko Varri wrote: > If the script is public domain, as a maintainer you can do whatever > you want with it. You do not have to mention the previous > maintainers. But... > > I did contact all the previous maintainers (those mentioned in the > script and those who had touched the script according to git log) and > asked whether they want to be mentioned according to the BSD/MIT > style. Most of them couldn't care less, so I dropped their names. > However, some of them appreciated the gesture and wanted to keep their > names in the scripts, so those stayed. Thank you guys for the answers. I think I'll try Mikko's approach and contact past maintainers and contributors, as simply removing them doesn't feel right to me. -- Audrius Ka?ukauskas http://neutrino.lt/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fakhry.linux at gmail.com Sat Nov 24 05:20:31 2012 From: fakhry.linux at gmail.com (Fakhry) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:20:31 +0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [Slackbuild-users] Error when building easymp3gain Message-ID: Dear SBo users, I'm try building easymp3gain on slackware 14.0. Here's copy few lines from my konsole: easymp3gain-0.5.0/unitmediagain.pas easymp3gain-0.5.0/unitvorbisgain.pas easymp3gain-0.5.0/callbackprocess.pas patching file unitmain.pas patching file easymp3gain.lpi Hunk #1 succeeded at 490 (offset -4 lines). chmod +x ./clean.sh ./clean.sh chmod +x ./make.sh ./make.sh Target architecture: x86_64 Target operating system: linux Compiler version: 2.6.0 Building easyMP3Gain ... mv: cannot stat './bin/easymp3gain': No such file or directory make: *** [all] Error 1 -- PS: Sorry if my English is bad Muhammad Fakhry http://fakhry.web.id/ http://kendari-slackers.org/ Please, like this page http://goo.gl/kHohr From koko at profitlook.com Sat Nov 24 05:36:06 2012 From: koko at profitlook.com (Wijatmoko U. Prayitno) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:36:06 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Error when building easymp3gain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 2012-11-24 12:20, Fakhry wrote: > mv: cannot stat './bin/easymp3gain': No such file or directory > make: *** [all] Error 1 It means, easymp3gain binary can't be found at ./bin/ folder. -- WUP From xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org Sat Nov 24 22:11:38 2012 From: xgizzmo at slackbuilds.org (David Somero) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20121124.1 Message-ID: <20121124221138.GA4481@slackbuilds.org> Sat Nov 24 20:52:44 UTC 2012 audio/cmus: Updated for version 2.5.0. desktop/gnome-themes-standard: Added (themes for the gnome desktop). desktop/gtk-engines-unico: Added (theme engine for GTK+3). desktop/rss-guard: Updated for version 1.1.2. desktop/spectrwm: Updated for version 2.1.0. development/avr8-gnu-toolchain: Added (AVR 8-bit GNU Toolchain). development/quilt: Updated for version 0.60 (+new maintainer) games/openttd: Updated for version 1.2.3. games/tong: Added (action game combining tetris and pong). libraries/libass: Updated for version 0.10.1. libraries/libbsd: Updated for version 0.4.2. libraries/libetpan: Updated for version 1.1. libraries/libfm: Updated for version 1.1.0. libraries/libgee: Updated for version 0.6.6.1. libraries/tbb: Updated for version 4.1u1. multimedia/dvdstyler: Updated for version 2.3.4. multimedia/smplayer: Updated for version 0.8.1. multimedia/smtube: Added (small youtube browser) multimedia/totem: Added (GNOME Movie Player). network/claws-mail-extra-plugins: Updated for version 3.9.0. network/claws-mail: Updated for version 3.9.0. network/opera: Updated for version 12.10. network/sieve-connect: Updated for version 0.83. network/ssmtp: Added (simple MTA that forwards to a smarthost). network/youtube-dl: Updated for version 2012.10.09. python/pypy: Added (implementation of Python written in Python) python/python3: Updated for version 3.3.0. system/adobe-source-code-pro-font: Added (adobe monospace font). system/adobe-source-sans-pro-font: Added (adobe-source sans font). system/atop: Updated for version 2.0_1. system/freefont: Updated for version 20120503. system/kc: Updated for version 2.1.6. system/ksh-openbsd: Added (OpenBSD's pdksh ported to Linux) system/pcmanfm: Updated for version 1.1.0. system/pmount: Updated for version 0.9.23. system/qtfm: Updated for version 5.5. system/rxvt-unicode: Added "--enable-256-color" to configure +--------------------------+ From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Sun Nov 25 00:10:11 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:11 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk download link: enhancement/fix Message-ID: <50B161E3.8080706@gmail.com> For jdk, the link should point to the OTN page and not the *.tgz. Otherwise, instead of getting the "agree to license" page you get: ---------------------- Sorry! In order to download products from Oracle Technology Network you must agree to the OTN license terms. Be sure that... Your browser has "cookies" and JavaScript enabled. You clicked on "Accept License" for the product you wish to download. You attempt the download within 30 minutes of accepting the license. From here you can go... Back to Previous Page Site Map OTN Homepage ------------------------ Perhaps a change to point to either: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html or http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7u9-downloads-1859576.html with the appropriate explanatory text. -Ed From hba.nihilismus at gmail.com Sun Nov 25 05:56:45 2012 From: hba.nihilismus at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Antonio_Hern=C3=A1ndez_Blas?=) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:56:45 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk download link: enhancement/fix In-Reply-To: <50B161E3.8080706@gmail.com> References: <50B161E3.8080706@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:10 PM, King Beowulf wrote: > For jdk, the link should point to the OTN page and not the *.tgz. Sorry, but why is there a jre/jdk SlackBuild in SBo when you can just use slackware-14.0/extra/java or slackware64-14.0/extra/java? It works for java's jre/jdk and java6/java7 -- - hba | Antonio Hern?ndez Blas | Oaxaca, M?xico, Mx. http://hba.dyndns.info | irc://irc.freenode.org/hba,isnick,needpass https://github.com/nihilismus | https://bitbucket.org/nihilismus https://twitter.com/nihilipster | http://www.last.fm/user/nihilipster From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Sun Nov 25 07:49:16 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:49:16 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk download link: enhancement/fix In-Reply-To: References: <50B161E3.8080706@gmail.com> Message-ID: <50B1CD7C.8060204@gmail.com> On 11/24/2012 09:56 PM, Antonio Hern?ndez Blas wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 6:10 PM, King Beowulf wrote: >> For jdk, the link should point to the OTN page and not the *.tgz. > Sorry, but why is there a jre/jdk SlackBuild in SBo when you can just > use slackware-14.0/extra/java or slackware64-14.0/extra/java? It works > for java's jre/jdk and java6/java7 > > Sorry, You'll have to ask the admins. AFAIK, SBo needs its own java packagesince some submissions need to list java (jdk) as a dependency. Stuff in /extra is not installed automatically so any installs requiring will fail unless flagged. -Ed From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Sun Nov 25 07:59:55 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:59:55 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] SweetHome3D update and fix Message-ID: <50B1CFFB.3010703@gmail.com> Giovanne I had an issuewith your SweetHome3D not running due to not being able to find the java7 version of javaws.jar (jdk-7 via SBo or in /extra). While I was at it I tried with the newer SweetHome3D-3.7. Since you are not packaging for the SweetHome3D bundled java6, you will need to watch out for where /usr/lib64/java/jre/lib/javaws.jar is located. Here is a patch: --- SweetHome3D.SlackBuild 2012-11-24 23:40:10.032146649 -0800 +++ SweetHome3d.SlackBuild.new 2012-11-24 23:10:38.000000000 -0800 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ # ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. PRGNAM=SweetHome3D -VERSION=${VERSION:-3.2} +VERSION=${VERSION:-3.7} BUILD=${BUILD:-1} TAG=${TAG:-_SBo} @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ cp -a SweetHome3D $PKG/usr/bin # Fix path for java and libs of SweetHome3D -sed -i "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_24\/bin\/java/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/bin\/java/g" $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM -sed -i "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_24\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/lib/g" $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM +sed -i "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_37\/bin\/java/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/bin\/java/g" $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM +sed -i "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_37\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/jre\/lib/g" $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM sed -i "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/$PRGNAM/g" $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM # Copy libraries of program From eric at schultzter.ca Sun Nov 25 19:42:15 2012 From: eric at schultzter.ca (Eric Schultz) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds up for grabs Message-ID: Good afternoon... The following SlackBuilds are mine, but I just don't have the time to do anything with them, so I feel like I'm maintaining them for nothing. If no one wants them then the admins may consider them abandoned. google-appengine-gosdk google-appengine-pysdk I'll leave my repo up indefinitely (for now) if you want to grab my original sources, including the Makefile that automated most of the work. Also, google-go-lang SlackBuild was taken over by Tobias Columbus (see mailing list from 14 Aug 2012) but it still shows as mine on SlackBuilds.org. -- Headed for the second star to the right and straight on 'til morning... Eric Schultz (aka schultzter ) Read more at 2FatDads On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, wrote: > Send SlackBuilds-users mailing list submissions to > slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > slackbuilds-users-request at slackbuilds.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > slackbuilds-users-owner at slackbuilds.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of SlackBuilds-users digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild > now? (vvoody) > 2. Re: No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild > now? (Robby Workman) > 3. Re: No submission code sending for new uploaded slackbuild > now? (vvoody) > 4. Re: Script licensing (Audrius Ka?ukauskas) > 5. [Slackbuild-users] Error when building easymp3gain (Fakhry) > 6. Re: Error when building easymp3gain (Wijatmoko U. Prayitno) > 7. Updates - 20121124.1 (David Somero) > 8. jdk download link: enhancement/fix (King Beowulf) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: vvoody > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Cc: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:30:11 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new > uploaded slackbuild now? > Thanks. It seems to be in the approved list, can not be removed. > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:25 AM, wrote: > >> On Tuesday 20 November 2012 15:45:26 vvoody wrote: >> > Oops... >> > >> > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just released >> a >> > new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo >> > wrote: >> > >> > > > Hi Willy, I checked, only true spams :( >> > > >> > > That's strange >> > > i did get it now >> > > i submitted some updates few days ago and it's all there on my inbox >> right >> > > now >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo >> >> >> Sent you the code. >> >> --dsomero >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SlackBuilds-users mailing list >> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org >> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users >> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ >> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ >> >> > > > -- > Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. > vvoody > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Robby Workman > To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > Cc: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:59:12 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new > uploaded slackbuild now? > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:26 +0100 > vvoody wrote: > > > Oops... > > > > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just > > released a new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D > > > Done. > > -RW > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: vvoody > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Cc: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 01:11:47 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] No submission code sending for new > uploaded slackbuild now? > Thank you, have a nice day :) > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Robby Workman wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:45:26 +0100 >> vvoody wrote: >> >> > Oops... >> > >> > @Robby, Hi, can you help me remove that opera build. They just >> > released a new one, I wanna submit the new version. Thanks :D >> >> >> Done. >> >> -RW >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SlackBuilds-users mailing list >> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org >> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users >> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ >> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ >> >> >> > > > -- > Free as freedom, slack as Slackware. > vvoody > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Audrius Ka?ukauskas > To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > Cc: > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:25:53 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Script licensing > On Sun, 2012-11-18 at 07:12:37 +0200, Mikko Varri wrote: > > If the script is public domain, as a maintainer you can do whatever > > you want with it. You do not have to mention the previous > > maintainers. But... > > > > I did contact all the previous maintainers (those mentioned in the > > script and those who had touched the script according to git log) and > > asked whether they want to be mentioned according to the BSD/MIT > > style. Most of them couldn't care less, so I dropped their names. > > However, some of them appreciated the gesture and wanted to keep their > > names in the scripts, so those stayed. > > Thank you guys for the answers. I think I'll try Mikko's approach and > contact past maintainers and contributors, as simply removing them > doesn't feel right to me. > > -- > Audrius Ka?ukauskas > http://neutrino.lt/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Fakhry > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Cc: > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:20:31 +0800 > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] [Slackbuild-users] Error when building > easymp3gain > Dear SBo users, > > I'm try building easymp3gain on slackware 14.0. > Here's copy few lines from my konsole: > > easymp3gain-0.5.0/unitmediagain.pas > easymp3gain-0.5.0/unitvorbisgain.pas > easymp3gain-0.5.0/callbackprocess.pas > patching file unitmain.pas > patching file easymp3gain.lpi > Hunk #1 succeeded at 490 (offset -4 lines). > chmod +x ./clean.sh > ./clean.sh > chmod +x ./make.sh > ./make.sh > Target architecture: x86_64 > Target operating system: linux > Compiler version: 2.6.0 > Building easyMP3Gain ... > mv: cannot stat './bin/easymp3gain': No such file or directory > make: *** [all] Error 1 > > > > > -- > PS: Sorry if my English is bad > > Muhammad Fakhry > http://fakhry.web.id/ > http://kendari-slackers.org/ > Please, like this page http://goo.gl/kHohr > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Wijatmoko U. Prayitno" > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Cc: > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 12:36:06 +0700 > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Error when building easymp3gain > On 2012-11-24 12:20, Fakhry wrote: > >> mv: cannot stat './bin/easymp3gain': No such file or directory >> make: *** [all] Error 1 >> > It means, easymp3gain binary can't be found at ./bin/ folder. > > -- > WUP > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Somero > To: slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > Cc: > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:11:38 -0500 > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20121124.1 > Sat Nov 24 20:52:44 UTC 2012 > audio/cmus: Updated for version 2.5.0. > desktop/gnome-themes-standard: Added (themes for the gnome desktop). > desktop/gtk-engines-unico: Added (theme engine for GTK+3). > desktop/rss-guard: Updated for version 1.1.2. > desktop/spectrwm: Updated for version 2.1.0. > development/avr8-gnu-toolchain: Added (AVR 8-bit GNU Toolchain). > development/quilt: Updated for version 0.60 (+new maintainer) > games/openttd: Updated for version 1.2.3. > games/tong: Added (action game combining tetris and pong). > libraries/libass: Updated for version 0.10.1. > libraries/libbsd: Updated for version 0.4.2. > libraries/libetpan: Updated for version 1.1. > libraries/libfm: Updated for version 1.1.0. > libraries/libgee: Updated for version 0.6.6.1. > libraries/tbb: Updated for version 4.1u1. > multimedia/dvdstyler: Updated for version 2.3.4. > multimedia/smplayer: Updated for version 0.8.1. > multimedia/smtube: Added (small youtube browser) > multimedia/totem: Added (GNOME Movie Player). > network/claws-mail-extra-plugins: Updated for version 3.9.0. > network/claws-mail: Updated for version 3.9.0. > network/opera: Updated for version 12.10. > network/sieve-connect: Updated for version 0.83. > network/ssmtp: Added (simple MTA that forwards to a smarthost). > network/youtube-dl: Updated for version 2012.10.09. > python/pypy: Added (implementation of Python written in Python) > python/python3: Updated for version 3.3.0. > system/adobe-source-code-pro-font: Added (adobe monospace font). > system/adobe-source-sans-pro-font: Added (adobe-source sans font). > system/atop: Updated for version 2.0_1. > system/freefont: Updated for version 20120503. > system/kc: Updated for version 2.1.6. > system/ksh-openbsd: Added (OpenBSD's pdksh ported to Linux) > system/pcmanfm: Updated for version 1.1.0. > system/pmount: Updated for version 0.9.23. > system/qtfm: Updated for version 5.5. > system/rxvt-unicode: Added "--enable-256-color" to configure > +--------------------------+ > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: King Beowulf > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Cc: > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:10:11 -0800 > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk download link: enhancement/fix > For jdk, the link should point to the OTN page and not the *.tgz. > Otherwise, instead of getting the "agree to license" page you get: > ---------------------- > Sorry! > In order to download products from Oracle Technology Network you must > agree to the OTN license terms. > Be sure that... > Your browser has "cookies" and JavaScript enabled. > You clicked on "Accept License" for the product you wish to download. > You attempt the download within 30 minutes of accepting the license. > From here you can go... > Back to Previous Page > Site Map > OTN Homepage > ------------------------ > Perhaps a change to point to either: > > http://www.oracle.com/**technetwork/java/javase/**downloads/index.html > > or > > http://www.oracle.com/**technetwork/java/javase/** > downloads/jdk7u9-downloads-**1859576.html > > with the appropriate explanatory text. > > -Ed > > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From insomniactoo at localnet.com Mon Nov 26 11:51:01 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:51:01 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A non-programmers question... Message-ID: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> Hi gang, I saw something last night that made me wonder why I've not seen it used in slackbuilds. What it is, is the use of -j, and it has something to do with using more than one processor during ./configure of an app/program or something, making it build(?) faster. I'm sure I don't understand it correctly but it made sense where I read/saw it (on the Haiku site btw, here http://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building/compiling-x86). Is that something that's used only for building a version of gcc or...? Could it be used in a SlackBuild of an app if I were to build it just for my own system (being's there's too many systems out there nowadays with differing numbers of cpu's on them), and would it help anything? -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From willysr at gmail.com Mon Nov 26 11:57:23 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:57:23 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A non-programmers question... In-Reply-To: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: > What it is, is the use of -j, and it has something to do with using more than > one processor during ./configure of an app/program or something, making it > build(?) faster. >From the make manual page -j [jobs], --jobs[=jobs] Specifies the number of jobs (commands) to run simultaneously. If there is more than one -j option, the last one is effective. If the -j option is given without an argument, make will not limit the number of jobs that can run simultaneously. -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com From slava18 at gmail.com Mon Nov 26 12:02:11 2012 From: slava18 at gmail.com (V'yacheslav Stetskevych) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:02:11 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A non-programmers question... In-Reply-To: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> References: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, wrote: > What it is, is the use of -j, and it has something to do with using > more than > one processor during ./configure of an app/program or something, making > it > build(?) faster. > export MAKEFLAGS="-j4" # where 4 is the number of cpu cores stick this ^ into an executable file in /etc/profile.d/ and you get parellelized make but some software breaks when you do this, so if anything fails to build, MAKEFLAGS="" ./some.SlackBuild have fun :-) - Vyacheslav -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Digital and all the music is free... http://www.getgnulinux.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From insomniactoo at localnet.com Mon Nov 26 15:43:16 2012 From: insomniactoo at localnet.com (insomniactoo at localnet.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:43:16 -0600 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] A non-programmers question... In-Reply-To: References: <20121126055101.538ea14c@oogah.boogah.org> Message-ID: <20121126094316.50b9e25b@oogah.boogah.org> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:02:11 +0200 "V'yacheslav Stetskevych" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, wrote: > > > What it is, is the use of -j, and it has something to do with using > > more than > > one processor during ./configure of an app/program or something, making > > it > > build(?) faster. > > > > export MAKEFLAGS="-j4" # where 4 is the number of cpu cores > stick this ^ into an executable file in /etc/profile.d/ > and you get parellelized make > but some software breaks when you do this, so if anything fails to build, > MAKEFLAGS="" ./some.SlackBuild > have fun :-) > - Vyacheslav > Aha! So it *can* be of some benefit! Great! Thank you and Willy for this information and letting me know how it works. -- FTG FTI FTP Registered Linux user #214117 at http://linuxcounter.net From g.denicolo at itdep.oapointroma.org Tue Nov 27 13:28:49 2012 From: g.denicolo at itdep.oapointroma.org (Giuseppe De Nicolo') Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:28:49 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xcdroast slackbuild broken only for me ? Message-ID: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> Hi , I downloaded the slackbuild fromw sbo once I upgraded to 14 x86_64 and I would like to point out that this package is completely broken for me , in slackware 14 cdrtools as been dropped and replace with cdrkit ( it wasn't the case in 13.37 ) , and now xcdroast won't work anymore ... it does compile and install but it wont start . To manage to make it work I had to install all these patch ( also make some symlinks manualy ) 15_no_readcd_version.patch 16_cannot_access_cdrecord.patch 17_invalid_mkisofs_version.patch 18_invalid_cdda2wav_version.patch fix_cddb_hidden_tracks.patch parse_version.patch In addition to the one inserted in the build ( although some of these are not for this version of xcdroast ) , and now I can use it and burn CD though it is still unusable for DVD as it doesnt find proDVD support wich was in cdrtools but it seems it cannot find it in cdrkit. Yes I quite aware that xcdroast is quite ancient software but I do use only gtk+ on my system , so basically what I m asking is .. Is this only my problem ?? am I missing something or is the slackbuild broken in slackware 14 ?? Thank you in advance From willysr at gmail.com Tue Nov 27 13:53:20 2012 From: willysr at gmail.com (Willy Sudiarto Raharjo) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:53:20 +0700 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xcdroast slackbuild broken only for me ? In-Reply-To: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> References: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> Message-ID: > I downloaded the slackbuild fromw sbo once I upgraded to 14 x86_64 and I > would like to point out that this package is completely broken for me , in > slackware 14 cdrtools as been dropped and replace with cdrkit ( it wasn't > the case in 13.37 ) , and now xcdroast won't work anymore ... it does > compile and install but it wont start . To manage to make it work I had to > install all these patch ( also make some symlinks manualy ) > > 15_no_readcd_version.patch > 16_cannot_access_cdrecord.patch > 17_invalid_mkisofs_version.patch > 18_invalid_cdda2wav_version.patch > fix_cddb_hidden_tracks.patch > parse_version.patch > > In addition to the one inserted in the build ( although some of these > are not for this version of xcdroast ) , and now I can use it and burn CD > though it is still unusable for DVD as it doesnt find proDVD support wich > was in cdrtools but it seems it cannot find it in cdrkit. > > Yes I quite aware that xcdroast is quite ancient software but I do use > only gtk+ on my system , so basically what I m asking is .. Is this only my > problem ?? am I missing something or is the slackbuild broken in slackware > 14 ?? It builds fine and it works fine too try switch to root and run xcdroast -n you will then have to reconfigure your application to work for non-root user On my desktop, it does failed to scan the device automatically, but it worked when i used the manual scanning process by entering /dev/cdrom and it found my DVD-RW drive :) -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo Personal Blog : http://willysr.blogspot.com Linux Blog: http://slackblogs.blogspot.com From audrius at neutrino.lt Tue Nov 27 13:54:20 2012 From: audrius at neutrino.lt (Audrius =?utf-8?Q?Ka=C5=BEukauskas?=) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:54:20 +0200 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xcdroast slackbuild broken only for me ? In-Reply-To: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> References: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> Message-ID: <20121127135420.GA1857@kiras> On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:28:49 +0100, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: > in slackware 14 cdrtools as been dropped and replace > with cdrkit ( it wasn't the case in 13.37 ) Slackware 14.0 still has cdrtools: $ cat /etc/slackware-version Slackware 14.0 $ slackpkg info cdrtools PACKAGE NAME: cdrtools-3.01a08-x86_64-1.txz PACKAGE LOCATION: ./slackware64/ap ... -- Audrius Ka?ukauskas http://neutrino.lt/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From matteo.bernardini at gmail.com Tue Nov 27 13:54:33 2012 From: matteo.bernardini at gmail.com (Matteo Bernardini) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:54:33 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xcdroast slackbuild broken only for me ? In-Reply-To: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> References: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> Message-ID: 2012/11/27 Giuseppe De Nicolo' > in slackware 14 cdrtools as been dropped and replace with cdrkit ( it > wasn't the case in 13.37 ) > slackware-14.0 still uses cdrtools. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From g.denicolo at itdep.oapointroma.org Tue Nov 27 15:19:39 2012 From: g.denicolo at itdep.oapointroma.org (Giuseppe De Nicolo') Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:19:39 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] xcdroast slackbuild broken only for me ? In-Reply-To: References: <50B4C011.1000303@itdep.oapointroma.org> Message-ID: <50B4DA0B.7030704@itdep.oapointroma.org> On 11/27/2012 02:54 PM, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > 2012/11/27 Giuseppe De Nicolo' > > > in slackware 14 cdrtools as been dropped and replace with cdrkit ( > it wasn't the case in 13.37 ) > > > slackware-14.0 still uses cdrtools. > > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > ok I guess I screwed it all ;-P I must have removed cdrtools somehow and then completely forgot to look for it on my slackware mirror and went on sbo wich popped up cdrkit OMG I lost hours to make it work with cdrkit heh ..... well my bad sorry all -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at microlinux.fr Wed Nov 28 07:05:40 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:05:40 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ESR Firefox & Thunderbird on SBo.org? Message-ID: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> Hi, Yesterday I've started a poll on LQ.org about including ESR versions of Firefox and Thunderbird in Slackware. Someone suggested to contact SBo.org for eventual SlackBuilds for these two. I know it's SBo's policy not to include scripts that replace official Slackware packages. Maybe these two can figure as an exception? According to the poll, these two packages would be quite popular. If there's a chance to include these in SBo.org, one addition that would be really helpful would be corresponding localization packages. A few remarks. 1) Eating my own dog food here, been using ESR versions since 13.37. Here are the SlackBuilds : http://www.microlinux.fr/slackware/14.0/source/ Take a peek at the mozilla-* directories 2) I know these scripts are not conforming to SBo's standards (no .info file, downloading is automatic, ...) but that could eventually be done. 3) So far I've installed ESR versions on a few dozen client desktops, and they work very nicely. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Wed Nov 28 07:28:50 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:28:50 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ESR Firefox & Thunderbird on SBo.org? In-Reply-To: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> References: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> Message-ID: <50B5BD32.4000500@gmail.com> On 11/27/2012 11:05 PM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday I've started a poll on LQ.org about including ESR versions > of Firefox and Thunderbird in Slackware. Someone suggested to contact > SBo.org for eventual SlackBuilds for these two. I know it's SBo's > policy not to include scripts that replace official Slackware > packages. Maybe these two can figure as an exception? According to the > poll, these two packages would be quite popular. > > If there's a chance to include these in SBo.org, one addition that > would be really helpful would be corresponding localization packages. > > A few remarks. > > 1) Eating my own dog food here, been using ESR versions since 13.37. > Here are the SlackBuilds : > > http://www.microlinux.fr/slackware/14.0/source/ > > Take a peek at the mozilla-* directories > > 2) I know these scripts are not conforming to SBo's standards (no > .info file, downloading is automatic, ...) but that could eventually > be done. > > 3) So far I've installed ESR versions on a few dozen client desktops, > and they work very nicely. > > Cheers, > > Niki > No idea how I missed the poll.....no doubt I was on some LQ rant ;-) This may be worth serious consideration. Making ESR releases easiliy availablewill search to stabiliize Slackware desktops in a corporate setting. From personal experience, I have had issues with both my internal company sites insidea VPN, and bank/credit card sites because the FF I am running is "too new." Spoofing the uersagent get tedious. And for the company I work for I had to *shudder* downgrade to WinXP/IE6 to access internal sites. ack. From info at microlinux.fr Wed Nov 28 09:45:09 2012 From: info at microlinux.fr (Niki Kovacs) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:45:09 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ESR Firefox & Thunderbird on SBo.org? In-Reply-To: <50B5BD32.4000500@gmail.com> References: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> <50B5BD32.4000500@gmail.com> Message-ID: <50B5DD25.2040807@microlinux.fr> Le 28/11/2012 08:28, King Beowulf a ?crit : > This may be worth serious consideration. Making ESR releases easiliy > availablewill search to stabiliize Slackware desktops in a corporate > setting. Well, if folks here are willing to host SlackBuild scripts for ESR, I'll gladly rewrite mine to accommodate SBo standards and submit them for approval. Keep me posted. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32 From yalhcru at gmail.com Wed Nov 28 20:08:55 2012 From: yalhcru at gmail.com (B Watson) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] ESR Firefox & Thunderbird on SBo.org? In-Reply-To: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> References: <50B5B7C4.8090506@microlinux.fr> Message-ID: On 11/28/12, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Yesterday I've started a poll on LQ.org about including ESR versions of > Firefox and Thunderbird in Slackware. I don't have an LQ account, so I vote here... A resounding "YES, please!" From mfilpot at gmail.com Thu Nov 29 03:03:26 2012 From: mfilpot at gmail.com (Matthew Fillpot) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] UrbanTerror SlackBuild In-Reply-To: <20121007033218.7cb2553f@deathstar.universe> References: <20121006232658.GD16129@pc21.mareichelt.com> <5070C5A3.1000008@gmail.com> <20121007033218.7cb2553f@deathstar.universe> Message-ID: On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Bojan Popovic wrote: > I'm an ocassional player of UrT too. 4.1.1 works fine on 14.0. I tried > 4.2 only on 13.37, but I'm downloading it again ATM (reevaluation :)). > > 4.2 is not packager friendly. There is no direct download link either > and what exists is not wget friendly. The new update tool doesn't accept > any command line options so it's not possible to download it > automatically without running gui. > > But 4.1.1 is still available here: > http://www.urbanterror.info/downloads/previous/. That includes direct > download links. > > 4.1.1 seems to still work fine so it might make sense to stick > with it. 4.1.1 is also the last version that doesn't use the new ingame > auth system and there seem to exist a lot of servers still running it > (or at least working with it). > > I tried the SlackBuild before, but the binary archive is ~1G and it > takes time to unpack and repackage. I find it easier to just unpack and > run. > > Either way, it won't be a big damage if it gets dropped. But it would > be nice if someone takes over maintainance of 4.1.1 package for at > least some time. > > As I said, it takes a lot of time for repackaging on my system. That > would also mean a lot of time for testing the package. UrT is not one > of the apps I would dedicate so much time for, so I can't offer to > take over the SB. Even if I did consider it for a short moment > (I'm still a bit of fan of the game). :) > > Bojan. > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > Admin, As it seems that no one wants to assume this slackbuild, can you please change the maintainer or games/UrbanTerror to unmaintained? -- -Thank You, -Matthew Fillpot -Slackware Documentation Project - Staff Editor - http://docs.slackware.com/wiki:user:mfillpot -Linux.com - Moderator - https://www.linux.com/forums/person/198 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kingbeowulf at gmail.com Thu Nov 29 17:16:47 2012 From: kingbeowulf at gmail.com (King Beowulf) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:16:47 -0800 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] SweetHome3D update and fix In-Reply-To: <50B3B42E.4020906@ig.com.br> References: <50B3B42E.4020906@ig.com.br> Message-ID: <50B7987F.4000408@gmail.com> Admins, I have the "blessing" to update SweetHome3D from Giovanne. Is the patch I sent sufficient or would you prefer me to submit the whole thing? Its tested on Slackware64 but not yet on Slackware32 (haven't updated my qemu VMs yet). See below. Thanks, Ed -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SweetHome3D update and fix Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:25:50 +0000 From: Giovanne Castro To: King Beowulf Hello, You can update the script and keep this package in SB..currently I'm out of time .. Thanks, Giovanne. Em 25-11-2012 07:59, King Beowulf escreveu: > Giovanne > > I had an issuewith your SweetHome3D not running due to not being able > to find the java7 version of javaws.jar (jdk-7 via SBo or in /extra). > While I was at it I tried with the newer SweetHome3D-3.7. Since you > are not packaging for the SweetHome3D bundled java6, you will need to > watch out for where /usr/lib64/java/jre/lib/javaws.jar is located. > > Here is a patch: > > --- SweetHome3D.SlackBuild 2012-11-24 23:40:10.032146649 -0800 > +++ SweetHome3d.SlackBuild.new 2012-11-24 23:10:38.000000000 -0800 > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ > # ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > > PRGNAM=SweetHome3D > -VERSION=${VERSION:-3.2} > +VERSION=${VERSION:-3.7} > BUILD=${BUILD:-1} > TAG=${TAG:-_SBo} > > @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ > cp -a SweetHome3D $PKG/usr/bin > > # Fix path for java and libs of SweetHome3D > -sed -i > "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_24\/bin\/java/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/bin\/java/g" > $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM > -sed -i > "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_24\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/lib/g" > $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM > +sed -i > "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_37\/bin\/java/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/bin\/java/g" > $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM > +sed -i > "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/jre1.6.0_37\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/java\/jre\/lib/g" > $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM > sed -i > "s/\"\$PROGRAM_DIR\"\/lib/\/usr\/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}\/$PRGNAM/g" > $PKG/usr/bin/$PRGNAM > > # Copy libraries of program > > > From adis at linux.org.ba Thu Nov 29 21:07:44 2012 From: adis at linux.org.ba (Adis Nezirovic) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:07:44 +0100 Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] New PostgreSQL SlackBuild Message-ID: Hello guys, I've just submitted new PostgreSQL SlackBuild with extensive changes, would like to hear from you if you have any problems: - Update for new upstream version (9.2.1) - Fix for pg_upgrade (pg_upgrade_support library) - OOM killer protection for main postmaster process - Use system timezone database - Allow easy building of all 'contrib' extensions PG_EXTENSIONS=ALL ./postgresql.SlackBuild - Enable (optional) NLS support ENABLE_NLS=1 ./postgresql.SlackBuild Thanks to Mikko and Audrius for useful suggestions. Best regards, Adis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: postgresql.tar.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 5484 bytes Desc: not available URL: