[Slackbuilds-users] slackbuild(s) failing on S14.1-64 when compat32 installed
Jim.Diamond at acadiau.ca
Wed Jan 1 22:46:46 UTC 2014
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:54 (-0500), xgizzmo wrote:
> It breaks Handbreak.
Hmmm... so it does.
Can anyone comment on whether this is a bug in the HandBreak build
process or whether it is a fundamental problem?
> On 12/31/13, Eric Hameleers (SBo) <alien at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
>> Jim Diamond schreef op 31-12-2013 16:44:
>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:41 (-0600), Gerardo Zamudio wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond at acadiau.ca>
>>>>> thanks very much for that info.
>>>>> In the bigger picture, while I can appreciate that the multilib setup
>>>>> is not "officially supported", I am wondering if there is any danger
>>>>> to adding
>>>>> to the slackbuild template (and to most slackbuilds).
>>>>> That is, if
>>>>> (a) it doesn't break anything on non-multilib systems, and
>>>>> (b) it makes more slackbuilds work on multilib systems
>>>>> then aside from one more line of code, is there any harm?
>>>> I think the reason is simply because multilib is not Slackware standard,
>>>> and the scripts are meant for a stock Slackware installation. Perhaps a
>>>> SlackBuilds admin can better answer that question.
>>> No comments from On High?
>>> Can anyone point out a situation where adding
>>> to the configure is certainly/likely/possibly going to break something?
>> In my opinion, it _never_ hurts to have that in a SlackBuild.
More information about the SlackBuilds-users