[Slackbuilds-users] need some advice (re: splix/jbigkit SBos)
Ryan P.C. McQuen
ryan.q at linux.com
Tue Nov 25 16:58:39 UTC 2014
>I solved the issue on the home front with a symlink
The spotify64 build uses symlinks to solve library compatibility issues:
You may find it helpful (although I'm not saying this is the best solution
On Nov 25, 2014 8:33 AM, "Heinz Wiesinger" <pprkut at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2014 12:26:09 Glenn Becker wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've been maintaining the SlackBuilds for splix and jbigkit. For a
> > while, printing has been an issue with my Samsung ML-2510, but I've
> > been too lazy to follow it up (obviously I don't print at home very
> > much). Not very responsible of me.
> > Anyhoo, the root problem is that splix development appears to have
> > stopped -- or at least greatly slowed. The current version of splix
> > looks for the library libjbig.2.0.0 ... but the current version of
> > the jbigkit library is libjbig.2.1. splix looks for v. 2.0.0, can't
> > find it and plotzes.
> > I solved the issue on the home front with a symlink, but was wondering
> > what SlackBuild best practice I should use in a case like this. Should
> > I roll back the jbigkit version?
> Did you check how other distros solve the problem? With quick checks I see
> that both Arch and Fedora seems to have splix using jbigkit 2.1 in their
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SlackBuilds-users