[Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20180623.1

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

>> I wonder if it would be better to keep the scripts in "pasture" in the
>> main branch but just change the maintainer name to UNMAINTAINED. Right
>> now, it's extremely difficult to find what scripts have been moved to
>> pasture unless it's in the most recent logs.
>>
>> Or maybe you guys are looking to specifically keep them out of the main
>> branch since they are unmaintained, in which case, maybe we could keep a
>> text file somewhere (maybe the root of the repo) of all the scripts in
>> pasture that can be easily referenced in case others would be interested
>> in taking them over. Or, we could move all unmaintained scripts to a
>> pasture folder in git, but not list that category on SBo.
>>
>> I'm just trying to find a way to make the list of scripts in pasture
>> more accessible to make it easier for maintainers to look through and
>> possibly take over. I'd love to peruse the full list, but I'm just not
>> finding an easy way to do it short of looking through the log in the
>> pasture branch, but that's mixed with regular public updates, so it's
>> hard to find all of them easily.
>>
>> I'd be open to any other suggestions too.
> 
> Hi Jeremy
> 
> Yes, that should be on pasture list
> i will update that branch soon with the newest update in master

Now the updated pasture is pushed to server
One note: I didn't removed fpc-source and gambas since they are still
used by other scripts in our repository.


-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20180624/8ce53f65/attachment-0001.asc>