[Slackbuilds-users] six and python3-six

[Frédéric Falsetti]

oups, sorry, thanks Matteo and Ben

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:59:44 -0700
Benjamin Trigona-Harany <slackbuilds at jaxartes.net> wrote:

> On 2018-10-30 10:57 a.m., Heinz Wiesinger wrote:
> > 
> > We have both python2 and python3 versions of six in a single package in -
> > current and it works just fine. I don't see why the package would need to be
> > treated differently from other python libs. What am I missing here?
> > 
> > Grs,
> > Heinz
> 
> I don't think you are missing anything. As long as the *version* of a 
> Python module is the same for Python 2 and Python 3, then it makes sense 
> to have them in a single package or SlackBuild. As I mentioned in my 
> other email, there are rare cases where this isn't possible: IPython 
> won't go above 5.x for Python 2 but is on 7.x for Python 3.
> 
> Otherwise, keeping them together is usually the way to go.
> 
> Ben
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>