[Slackbuilds-users] sbotools maintainership?

[B. Watson]

On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Shahab Vahedi via SlackBuilds-users wrote:

> K. Eugene Carlson wrote:
>
>> B. Watson wrote:
>>> You don't have to rename your source. You can keep the SBo package
>>> named 'sbotools'
>
> What happens for the people who have installed sbotools3 package then?
> Is there a plan to update both packages or sbotools3 package will silently
> get no updates or removed?

I wasn't aware there already was a sbotools3 package... I thought
Eugene was talking about switching sbotools to a fork that's actually
maintained. If that were the case, there'd be no need to rename the
source tarball.

Since there already is a sbotools3, I don't know what Eugene's got in
mind. Get rid of one or the other might be a good guess...?