I don't know like this package - it doesn't comply with Slackware packaging, so I would go with option 1.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/27/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alan Hicks</b> <<a href="mailto:alan@lizella.net">
alan@lizella.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Robby Workman wrote:<br>>> I am very much against this binary patching. Symlinking would be much
<br>>> cleaner.<br>><br>> That being the case, would it be better to do one of these:<br>> 1. Remove the qemu binary repackage script from our repo, since it<br>> can't be made to work properly *and* keep everything out of the
<br>> /usr/local hierarchy, OR<br>> 2. Leave the qemu binary distributed in /usr/local as it's packaged<br>> originally and add/rearrange only as needed for the docs and such<br>> to be compliant with Slackware packaging
<br>> 3. Leave it as is and hope for the best<br><br>4. Leave it as is and make note of the problem with both solutions in<br>the README for the user to consider. Never, ever, out think the user.<br>When the solution is this easy, and it's noted clear in the README file,
<br>than a user has no right to complain or think a "package" as it were is<br>broken. Period.<br><br>--<br>It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,<br>Than for a man to hear the song of fools.<br>Ecclesiastes 7:5
<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Slackbuilds-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org">Slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users">
http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>