<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span>Hi,<br>
</span></span></p>
<p><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span>On Monday</span> <span>I
will make</span> <span>the changes</span> <span>in the</span>
<span>README</span> <span>file</span> <span>for</span> <span
class="">msgpack-python</span> <span>and</span> <span>the</span>
<span class="">similar packages<br>
</span></span></p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/12/2016 02:57 PM, Andrzej
Telszewski wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1d0fdecb-449d-2a01-32bc-90fafeb2cec6@gmail.com"
type="cite">On 12/11/16 09:58, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">The question is:
<br>
Should optional deps be mentioned in README, also if they
<br>
are autodetected?
<br>
I feel: yes
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Of course they should.
<br>
I read READMEs, but please don't make me read SlackBuilds to
find out
<br>
optional packages.
<br>
<br>
When I posted this message, I thought the action was
obvious: update
<br>
the README and that's it.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Pretty obvious also for me, i don't understand what Willy
wanted to say.
<br>
To me it sounds like "it is correct this way", but at least it
is still
<br>
unclear.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hi,
<br>
<br>
Yes, it should be updated in the README, but i was hoping that
the
<br>
maintainer (Dimitris) will do it since he is very active and he
is on
<br>
this list as well. He also had privileges to make changes
directly to
<br>
the git as well.
<br>
<br>
cc'ing Dimitris
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thank you :-)
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>