<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <p><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span>Hi,<br>
        </span></span></p>
    <p><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span>On Monday</span> <span>I
          will make</span> <span>the changes</span> <span>in the</span>
        <span>README</span> <span>file</span> <span>for</span> <span
          class="">msgpack-python</span> <span>and</span> <span>the</span>
        <span class="">similar packages<br>
        </span></span></p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/12/2016 02:57 PM, Andrzej
      Telszewski wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1d0fdecb-449d-2a01-32bc-90fafeb2cec6@gmail.com"
      type="cite">On 12/11/16 09:58, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <blockquote type="cite">The question is:
              <br>
              Should optional deps be mentioned in README, also if they
              <br>
              are autodetected?
              <br>
              I feel: yes
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            Of course they should.
            <br>
            I read READMEs, but please don't make me read SlackBuilds to
            find out
            <br>
            optional packages.
            <br>
            <br>
            When I posted this message, I thought the action was
            obvious: update
            <br>
            the README and that's it.
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
          Pretty obvious also for me, i don't understand what Willy
          wanted to say.
          <br>
          To me it sounds like "it is correct this way", but at least it
          is still
          <br>
          unclear.
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Hi,
        <br>
        <br>
        Yes, it should be updated in the README, but i was hoping that
        the
        <br>
        maintainer (Dimitris) will do it since he is very active and he
        is on
        <br>
        this list as well. He also had privileges to make changes
        directly to
        <br>
        the git as well.
        <br>
        <br>
        cc'ing Dimitris
        <br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Thank you :-)
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>