<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:54 AM marav <<a href="mailto:marav8@free.fr">marav8@free.fr</a>> wrote:</span></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>
    <p><font size="4">I for one, I think all binary packages should be
        renamed with *-bin</font></p>
    <p><font size="4">It gives the most important information that the
        slackbuild is not a compiled version, directly in the name<br>
        No matter if there is a compiled version or not</font></p></div></blockquote><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">All --</div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">Thinking out loud here ...</div><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">I agree with marav but would there not need to be special, one-time instructions to `removepkg old-package-without-dash-bin` before doing an `upgradepkg --install-nre new-package-with-bin` ?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">Othewise, wouldn't upgradepkg be confused ? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">And would /var/log/packages/ be 'corrupted' ?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:monospace,monospace">-- kjh</div></div></div>