<html><body><div id="edo-message"><div></div>This tool emmet1 made based on and acting like the CRUX tool of the same name is still my favorite out of Didler’s, Pat’s and others I’ve used. It’s simple and powerful and finds missing .so’s perfectly. </div><div id="edo-message"><br></div><div id="edo-message"><a href="https://gist.github.com/emmett1/eb71186ba5567be46ad34ae59ba1fa57">https://gist.github.com/emmett1/eb71186ba5567be46ad34ae59ba1fa57</a><br></div><div id="edo-message"><br></div><div id="edo-message">Of course things like Firefox/thunderbird will show up but they can be safely ignored. Everything else will be shown correctly and for .so files, it’s invaluable. </div><br><div id="edo-meta"><div id="edo-signature" style="font-family: sans-serif, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial;">— Jay Lanagan</div></div><div id="edo-original"><div><br><br><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:1ex 0 0 0; height: min-content; border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:0.5ex;"><div>On Mar 1, 2024 at 5:20 AM, <<a href="mailto:slackalaxy@gmail.com">Petar Petrov</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div><pre class="edo-pre ">
revdep checks for broken *.so, so it would not matter whether your deps were optional or not. People running -current, who install stuff from SBo, would greatly benefit from such a tool. regards, -p On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 12:16, Tim Dickson via SlackBuilds-users <slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > the problem is the optional dependencies. how does a tool know which > options you like. > Only when such a tool which has your preferred optional deps recorded > exists, can there > be a way to reverse dep without missing out bits. > regards, Tim > > On 01/03/2024 09:38, Petar Petrov wrote: > > there were several discussions about Slackware needing a tool such as > > revdep, to check for issues like this. Search LQ, however, I did not > > find a good solution that just works. I got advice to make my own > > tool, as well as, statements how people use their own "home made" > > tools for this. > > > > -p > > > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 18:12, Jim <zsd+slackbuilds@jdvb.ca> wrote: > >> I recently upgraded the SBo dav1d, which upgraded the library from > >> libdav1d.so.6 to libdav1d.so.7. > >> > >> Unfortunately, a couple of other SBo packages (libheif and vlc) had > >> references to (specifically) libdav1d.so.6, which caused them to whine a > >> bit. > >> > >> It was easy enough to recompile libheif and vlc after I found the problem, > >> but this got me wondering... > >> > >> Does anyone have an easy way of tracking down this sort of "breakage" which > >> might happen when upgrading an SBo package? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> Jim > >> _______________________________________________ > >> SlackBuilds-users mailing list > >> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org > >> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > >> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > >> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > > SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org > > https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > > Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > > FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org > https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > _______________________________________________ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
</pre></div></blockquote></div></div></body></html>