
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 12pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>

<p id="reply-intro">On 12/03/2025 19:58, Spycrowsoft wrote:</p>

<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">

<div id="replybody1">

<div>

<p>Should programs which are only available in binary form also be named *-bin?</p>

</div>

</div>

</blockquote>

<p>These should follow what's generally excepted for decades and be named by their architecture like redhat and debian have always done, what Pat does, in fact, what winweenies also get</p>

<p>bind-9.16.25-x86_64-1.txz<br />google-earth-pro-stable_current_amd64.deb<br />google-earth-stable_current_i386.deb<br />master-pdf-editor-3.2.81_i386.tar.gz<br />master-pdf-editor-3.7.10_amd64.tar.gz<br />TeamViewer_Setup_x64.exe </p>

<p>... and so on...</p>

<p><br /></p>

<div id="signature">-- <br />

<p>Regards,<br />Noel Butler</p>

<p><br /></p>

</div>

</body></html>