<html><head></head><body><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="auto">On November 17, 2025 12:58:07 PM GMT+01:00, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo <willysr@slackbuilds.org> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">Is SBo accepting updates of orphaned packages without that person<br>submitting updates taking ownership?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>No. Occasionally an SBo admin may do this, but anyone else has to take<br>ownership.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="auto">Seems like if you're going to submit an update for an orphaned<br>package, you should take ownership of it... but maybe that's just my<br>thought process and others wouldn't agree. <br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>Yes, that's the general rule.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br>Yeah, that's the general rule<br>i may have missed that one, my bad<br><br>well, 2 considering hhg-gui failed on i586 build and i merged them<br>anyway :(<br><br><br>--<br>Willy Sudiarto Raharjo<br></div></pre></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div dir="auto">I thought opera-ffmpeg-codecs did get a new maintainer along with the update? Or am I misreading the new .info?<br><br>Heiko</div><div dir="auto"><div class='k9mail-signature'>-- <br>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</div></div></body></html>