[Slackbuilds-users] linuxwacom slackbuild

[Heinz Wiesinger]

Robby Workman wrote:
> Murat D. Kadirov wrote:
> > 11:15 Fri 08 Aug     , Jim Diamond написал:
> >> P.S. For everyone who makes slack packages...  Maybe this has been
> >> hashed out 100 times and you don't do it for some good reason, but if
> >> not, would you consider using "-j 4" or something like than on your
> >> "make" commands?  Even on a single core, single CPU machine this helps
> >> noticeably, and on a multi-core machine it makes a big difference.
> >
> > Not all programs, not on all machines (processors?) compile properly with
> > "-j X".
>
> Indeed.
>
> It's still a sane default IMHO, and in those cases where we find
> something doesn't compile with parallel make jobs, we can do something
> like this instead:
>
>    make || MAKEFLAGS="" make -j1
>

so $JOBS is now obsoloted by that one and new packages should use this 
instead?

Grs,
Heinz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20080808/22ca1519/attachment.sig>