[Slackbuilds-users] Package Build Issues -- Update

Robby Workman rw at rlworkman.net
Mon Feb 2 02:43:32 UTC 2009


On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:18:43 -0800 (PST)
Rich Shepard <rshepard at appl-ecosys.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Scott Harmon wrote:
> 
> > Did you restore /usr/local/{lib,bin}... ?
> 
> Scott,
> 
>    Yes. The restore default is to not overwrite disk files with the
> same or newer mtimes. We suspect that somehow a file on tape had a
> newer time than the one on disk. I did not pick specific applications
> because I did not have a separate list of those.
> 
>    I can always re-install stock -12.2 apps that go in /usr/local/ if
> I can identify which ones do so.


None.  /usr/local is for *local* system-specific software compiled by
the system admin and typically *not* packaged.  


>    Good question, Scott! I find a lot of broken links
> in /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/lib that I'll fix right after dinner.


NO, NO, NO.  

/usr/local is where *applications* go.  Don't restore them from backup
if they were built on an older version of Slackware.  Among the
problems you'll encounter are missing and unresolved symbols in
libraries.

-RW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20090201/9c8c0dcf/attachment-0001.asc>


More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list