[Slackbuilds-users] Maintenance of orphans
larryhaja at gmail.com
Wed Dec 1 00:27:21 UTC 2010
I think simple is better as well. I'd like to dump some of my
packages and just put in on a list rather then spamming the
slackbuilds user list.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Phillip Warner <pc_warner at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- On Tue, 11/30/10, King Beowulf <kingbeowulf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think simple is better. Name,
>> project site, lang/arch, brief
>> description would be enough. Anyone interested in picking
>> up the
>> maintainership can go look up deps and more (and should
>> anyway since
>> projects can change). Some of the info will be in old
>> slackbuilds for
>> the previous slackware versions as well.
> I lean towards what you are saying. Why not just have people send in their requests w/
> Brief description
> Any extra could be under the description field and would just be gravy.
> It might be useful to know how *many* people or are requesting certain SlackBuilds.
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
More information about the SlackBuilds-users