[Slackbuilds-users] pixbuf - redundant?
gort.klaatu at gmail.com
Fri Jan 7 21:56:12 UTC 2011
ok it's confirmed, there is no need for gdk_pixbuf 0.22.0 in order to
build LiVES 1.3.4
i tried it. it works. and so does lives. such as it does.
On 1/2/11, Klaatu <gort.klaatu at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking into whether I can get LiVES going with the new gdk_pixbuf.
> On 1/1/11, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:19:40 -0400
>> B Watson <yalhcru at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Looks that way to me. Maybe rename the SBo package to gdk-pixbuf-1 or
>>> gdk-pixbuf-legacy, and/or add a "This is the legacy gdk-pixbuf from
>>> Gtk+ 1" type of statement to README + slack-desc?
>> Maybe. I want to see what klaatu says first (though I'm not
>> sure why it matters)...
>>> Also... "grep pixbuf */*/README" shows only desktop/wmdrawer and
>>> multimedia/LiVES actually require the gdk-pixbuf on SBo (graphics/gliv
>>> mentions it in the README too, but it's talking about the 2.x
>>> Maybe the [maintainer of LiVES] could see if there's a way
>>> to build against the 2.x version, and then the old one could
>>> just go away?
>> Klaatu, could you check on this? I'd be surprised to learn that
>> it really requires a gtk+1 library...
>>> ...addendum: wmdrawer's README says "This requires gdk-pixbuf", but
>>> during the compile:
>>> > gcc -Wall -O2 -fPIC `pkg-config --cflags gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0`
>>> > -I/usr/include -DLINUX -DUSE_GDKPIXBUF2 -c utils.c
>>> It's using the 2.0 one that's in Slackware already (I don't even have
>>> the 1.x one installed). So, all it needs is a line removed from
>>> its README...
>> Yep, fixed in my git branch. Thanks!
> uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
> kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
More information about the SlackBuilds-users