[Slackbuilds-users] Lapack SlackBuild

[James Smith]

That sounds like a wise approach!

Thanks again.
James


On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Serban Udrea  
<serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:

> On 07/19/2012 05:36 AM, James Smith wrote:
>> ...
>> Thanks for your comments. So you agree with my patch then? ;-)
>> ...
>
> Not yet. Besides, even if I would agree, it's not against a script I  
> maintain.
>
> For a final opinion, I need to check, if the change you propose(#)  
> would impact at least on numpy and scipy, which I maintain  -- not  
> to speak about things I have in work, or the fact that others may  
> need to check what happens with the lapack related software they  
> provide a SlackBuild for(*). Sincerely speaking, it might be much  
> easier to just patch hmatrix to also link against wathever kind of  
> blas is installed. Still, it may not be the right way to go.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Serban
>
> (#) And a similar one applied to lapack-atlas.
>
> (*) My feeling is that there would be no impact at all, but checking  
> is better. Nevertheless, this would take me some time.
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>