[Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line)

[JK Wood]

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:03 PM, slakmagik <slakmagik at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi. :)
>
> For a similar case, I just removed a defunct repo file and we probably
> should never have included any non-SBo repo. It's easy for the user to
> integrate their own unofficial repo files in the repos directory.
> Similarly, while Mauro's helped develop sbopkg, it and the queuefile
> projects are separate things and, if he stopped maintaining the
> queuefiles, I'd have to take out what I'd just put in. It's easy for the
> user to put the files into the queuedir if they want. Also, anyone can
> have a queufile project. If anyone's project was to be privileged, it'd
> be his, but I'd rather no single queuefile project was privileged and I
> don't want to try to deal with an indefinite number of them.
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
For the record, if I had realized that the Slamd64Builds repo was in
sbopkg, I would have had you disable it long ago.  It was a valiant effort,
but we were blindsided by the release of Slackware 64.

--JK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20121008/3d21e844/attachment.html>