[Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 76, Issue 6
vliegendehuiskat at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 07:44:24 UTC 2012
live555: That build works, but it takes the latest from git and was
never meant to be taken up in slackbuilds.org. I just made it that way
because I got sick and tired of updating the development versions.
Virtualbox: I don't use the addons, so I didn't need to touch those
slackbuilds, but thanks for the catch!
vlc: lots of configure flags removed because it had a major version
update. It should now be autodetecting a lot of those flags.
Anyway, it's was just a pointer so that your not possibly doing double
work. That repo is filled with my fixes to keep everything running
smoothly. I'm not expecting you to mindlessly merge everything (like
virtualbox for example), so no offence taken ;-)
On 10-09-12 23:38, Robby Workman wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:24:12 +0200
> Jasper Klein <vliegendehuiskat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys!
>> Just to let you know, I've already fixed some of the packages on this
>> checklist: http://www.slackbuilds.org/Checklist.txt
>> Examples include wireshark, virtualbox and vlc.
>> You can find these fixes in my github mirror of SBo at:
> I think everything has been merged except for the following:
> live555: the "latest" version is not necessarily a problem on its own,
> but that tarball will obviously change upstream and make our md5 hash
> be wrong. You'd really need to host the tarball somewhere else, *and*
> change the naming from "latest" to something else, e.g. date-based.
> virtualbox*: you missed the addons, which have to stay synced with the
> other parts. pprkut says that vbox-4.2.0 is due real soon now and that
> he will get the build updated very soon after that :-)
> vlc: lots of configure flags removed make me nervous. I'm not saying
> it's wrong, but without time to verify it right now, I'd rather hold
> off on that commit. If some others can confirm that it's correct as
> is, then sure, I'll take it.
More information about the SlackBuilds-users