[Slackbuilds-users] slackbuild(s) failing on S14.1-64 when compat32 installed

xgizzmo xgizzmo at gmail.com
Wed Jan 1 16:54:26 UTC 2014


It breaks Handbreak.

On 12/31/13, Eric Hameleers (SBo) <alien at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
> Jim Diamond schreef op 31-12-2013 16:44:
>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 09:41 (-0600), Gerardo Zamudio wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond at acadiau.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Gerardo,
>>>> thanks very much for that info.
>>>> In the bigger picture, while I can appreciate that the multilib setup
>>>> is not "officially supported", I am wondering if there is any danger
>>>> to adding
>>>> LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}"
>>>> to the slackbuild template (and to most slackbuilds).
>>>> That is, if
>>>> (a) it doesn't break anything on non-multilib systems, and
>>>> (b) it makes more slackbuilds work on multilib systems
>>>> then aside from one more line of code, is there any harm?
>>>> Thanks.
>>
>>> I think the reason is simply because multilib is not Slackware standard,
>>> and the scripts are meant for a stock Slackware installation. Perhaps a
>>> SlackBuilds admin can better answer that question.
>> No comments from On High?
>>
>> Can anyone point out a situation where adding
>> 	LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}"
>> to the configure is certainly/likely/possibly going to break something?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> 				Jim
>>
> In my opinion, it _never_ hurts to have that in a SlackBuild.
>
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>


More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list