[Slackbuilds-users] Comments required for iperf3 submission

Thomas Szteliga ts at websafe.pl
Thu Aug 11 15:04:00 UTC 2016

On 11.08.2016 16:42, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
>> I use iperf3 from time to time and find it very useful. I noticed that
>> SBo only has iperf2 - and would like to submit scripts for iperf3. Is
>> there much interest in this, and also, is there any reason why SBo
>> shouldn't have iperf3?
> the maintainer is no longer active i guess
> his last update was 6 years ago
> i think you can take over this package and update it to iperf3

I would not update it to iperf3 but create a separate
iperf3 SlackBuild, because there are iperf2 and iperf3
clients out there, and v2 is not compatible with v3.


Not every platform has iperf3 available and both
v2 and v3 are AFAIK still under development,
so I think it would be good to have both
available. Just a thought.

Thomas Szteliga

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3719 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20160811/97793dfb/attachment.p7s>

More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list