yalhcru at gmail.com
Sun Sep 3 17:48:55 UTC 2017
On 9/3/17, Fernando Lopez <fernando.lopezjr at gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont see the need to remove packages. the more packages there are in
> sbopkg the better even if outdated. I hate when admins remove packages just
> because "it is not needed by any package" or "outdated" or "it breaks this"
> or that... just add a note explaining the issue and have the user decide
> if they will use the package or not but dont erase it for the rest of us.
> my two cents.
I normally would agree with you. However, PyXML causes actual harm: if
it's installed, it causes random Python scripts to break, if they're
trying to use the XML library that ships with Python itself. It will
create extra *and pointless* work for maintainers. And the functionality
of PyXML became part of core Python itself years ago.
In other words, it conflicts with a package that's in core Slackware,
which is against SBo guidelines. It's installing a 13-year-old outdated
version of a library that's already present in Slackware's python package.
I'm more familiar with Perl than Python, but this happens all the time:
SBo has a Perl module, and in the next release of Slackware, the core
perl package starts including that module. Keeping the old one around
can cause problems with perl scripts.
More information about the SlackBuilds-users