[Slackbuilds-users] Is it worthwhile for a ports like package manager for Slackware
z.coldplayer at gmail.com
Sun Feb 18 07:25:41 UTC 2018
But pkgsrc does not use the slackbuilds.org Slackbuilds to build packages.
On 16 February 2018 at 14:11, Noryungi <noryungi at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you go that way, may I draw your attention to the fact that NetBSD pkgsrc
> exists and works very well under Slackware?
> Why reinvent the wheel?
> On Feb 16, 2018 09:29, "Jheengut Pritvi" <z.coldplayer at gmail.com> wrote:
>> With the forthcoming of Slackware 15.0, I have been nostalgic of the
>> days when I tried crazy thing with my Slackbox. One of those was using
>> BSD's ports and portage within Slackware. It was a succees and a
>> failure too. In those times, I was not using slackbuilds.org.
>> The big question:::
>> Is it worthwhile for a ports/portage/pacman like package manager for
>> Slackware that manages both binary and source packages?
>> It could be tool on top of pkgtool and sbopkg.
>> What is your opinion?
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
More information about the SlackBuilds-users