[Slackbuilds-users] six and python3-six
slackbuilds at jaxartes.net
Mon Oct 29 16:52:53 UTC 2018
On 2018-10-29 5:44 a.m., Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, B Watson wrote:
>> Do we need separate six and python3-six builds?
>> Right now, six will build & install python3 support if python3 is
>> installed on the build box. python3-six is identical, except (a) it
>> requires python3 in the .info file and (b) it builds only the python3
> I'm a Python end-user and support the idea of having one build that
> supports both Python2 and Python3. All my new code is Python3 but many
> applications remain bound to Python2. It will take a while for everyone to
> migrate to Python3.
For what it's worth, when 15.0 is released, I strongly advocate that
Python SlackBuilds cover both Python 2 and 3 together in the same script
- just like Pat is doing on current now. Yes, there are few cases where
this won't be possible due to incompatibilities (for example IPython
needs different versions for Python 2 and Python 3), but those are
For 14.2, there are several approaches being taken depending on the
script maintainer, including various types of support for Python 3 in a
Python 2 build script or having two scripts, one each for 2 and 3. My
opinion is that we probably don't want to rock the boat too much during
14.2's lifetime but when we do switch to 15.0, I expect to see quite a
bit of change in the Python SlackBuilds landscape.
That being said, I have added *mandatory* Python 3 support to a few of
my SlackBuild scripts to gauge whether it might make sense to start the
conversion earlier (e.g.
So far no complaints. It's 2018 ... who still objects to having Python 3
More information about the SlackBuilds-users