[Slackbuilds-users] new maintainers omitting READMEs
Matt Egger
matt.egger at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 15:10:57 UTC 2025
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:33 AM David Chmelik <dchmelik at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > if they need more information on how to use, they should follow
> > upstream documentation for more detailed information
> Upstream README.* should be README, because it's more information on
> what a piece of software even is.
I don' fully understand the change you're asking for. Do you have an
example? Perhaps one of the slackbuilds you maintain contrasted with one
that you think needs more detail in the README?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20250325/0777abf8/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the SlackBuilds-users
mailing list