[Slackbuilds-users] grub_legacy worth keeping in the repo?
Marco Moock
mm at dorfdsl.de
Fri Jul 17 07:07:59 UTC 2026
Am 17.07.26 um 08:09 schrieb B. Watson:
>
> I'm not a GRUB user, never have been (I still use lilo and legacy
> boot, or elilo if that's impossible), so I have to ask...
>
> Is there a reason for grub_legacy (grub-0.97) to exist? Is there
> hardware that is supported by the old version of grub that can't be
> booted with the newer grub that ships with Slackware? Does anyone on
> this mailing list own such hardware, and would miss grub_legacy if it
> were gone?
I am not ware of any hardware that can be booted with GRUB 0.97, but not
GRUB2.
Both are BIOS bootloaders. GRUB 2 support booting from MBR and GPT (with
bios_boot partition).
A BIOS just boots the first sector of a disk - rest is task of the
bootloader.
--
Gruß
Marco
Junk-Mail bitte an trashcan at stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 665 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20260717/e402cf05/attachment-0001.asc>
More information about the SlackBuilds-users
mailing list