[Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds.org repository
alan at lizella.net
Tue Feb 6 16:35:25 UTC 2007
Daniel de Kok wrote:
> First of all, I'd like to thank you all for the excellent work on SBo!
We'd like to thank you for your submissions, Daniel. I haven't
personally looked at them, but those who have said they were of
generally high quality, certainly above average.
> Could you consider making SBo available as a Mercurial repository? This
> would have some nice advantages:
> - Quick dowloads of updates as an alternative to rsync.
> - The possibility to get logs and diffs of changes between versions.
> - The possibility to revert to older versions of a SlackBuild.
> - Making it a lot easier to keep/maintain local changes (e.g. if
> I have local PostgreSQL modifications, a "hg pull" would merge
> upstream updates with my local changes).
> - For those of us who submit SlackBuilds, it is easier to quickly
> see what changes were made compared to the SBo repository. This
> may be easier for you too, because you could get updates as diffs,
> which will usually be short.
> Especially the first four points can be of tremendous help for those
> (including me) who have to maintain package sets for production systems.
> And after all, Mercurial is in Slackware now :).
I'm not familiar with Mercurial, so I'll defer to others judgement in
this area. I can say that we've tossed around the idea of SVN, CVS, or
RCS on the -devel mailing list, but I haven't seriously followed those
discussions. Hopefully others will chime in here soon.
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20070206/39ccc534/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the Slackbuilds-users