[Slackbuilds-users] Maintenance of orphans

[Larry Hajali]

I think simple is better as well.  I'd like to dump some of my
packages and just put in on a list rather then spamming the
slackbuilds user list.

--Larry

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Phillip Warner <pc_warner at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- On Tue, 11/30/10, King Beowulf <kingbeowulf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think simple is better. Name,
>> project site, lang/arch, brief
>> description would be enough. Anyone interested in picking
>> up the
>> maintainership can go look up deps and more (and should
>> anyway since
>> projects can change). Some of the info will be in old
>> slackbuilds for
>> the previous slackware versions as well.
>
> I lean towards what you are saying.  Why not just have people send in their requests w/
>
> Name
> Homepage
> Brief description
>
> Any extra could be under the description field and would just be gravy.
>
> It might be useful to know how *many* people or are requesting certain SlackBuilds.
>
> --phillip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>