[Slackbuilds-users] pixbuf - redundant?

Klaatu gort.klaatu at gmail.com
Sun Jan 2 18:15:12 UTC 2011


I'm looking into whether I can get LiVES going with the new gdk_pixbuf.

On 1/1/11, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:19:40 -0400
> B Watson <yalhcru at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks that way to me. Maybe rename the SBo package to gdk-pixbuf-1 or
>> gdk-pixbuf-legacy, and/or add a "This is the legacy gdk-pixbuf from
>> Gtk+ 1" type of statement to README + slack-desc?
>
>
> Maybe.  I want to see what klaatu says first (though I'm not
> sure why it matters)...
>
>
>> Also... "grep pixbuf */*/README" shows only desktop/wmdrawer and
>> multimedia/LiVES actually require the gdk-pixbuf on SBo (graphics/gliv
>> mentions it in the README too, but it's talking about the 2.x
>> version).
>>
>> Maybe the [maintainer of LiVES] could see if there's a way
>> to build against the 2.x version, and then the old one could
>> just go away?
>
>
> Klaatu, could you check on this?  I'd be surprised to learn that
> it really requires a gtk+1 library...
>
>
>> ...addendum: wmdrawer's README says "This requires gdk-pixbuf", but
>> during the compile:
>>
>> > gcc -Wall -O2 -fPIC `pkg-config --cflags gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0`
>> > -I/usr/include -DLINUX -DUSE_GDKPIXBUF2 -c utils.c
>>
>> It's using the 2.0 one that's in Slackware already (I don't even have
>> the 1.x one installed). So, all it needs is a line removed from
>> its README...
>
>
> Yep, fixed in my git branch.  Thanks!
>
> -RW
>


-- 
---
uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
fedorareloaded.com


More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list