[Slackbuilds-users] pixbuf - redundant?

[Klaatu]

ok it's confirmed, there is no need for gdk_pixbuf 0.22.0 in order to
build LiVES 1.3.4

i tried it.  it works.  and so does lives.  such as it does.

--klaatu

On 1/2/11, Klaatu <gort.klaatu at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking into whether I can get LiVES going with the new gdk_pixbuf.
>
> On 1/1/11, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:19:40 -0400
>> B Watson <yalhcru at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks that way to me. Maybe rename the SBo package to gdk-pixbuf-1 or
>>> gdk-pixbuf-legacy, and/or add a "This is the legacy gdk-pixbuf from
>>> Gtk+ 1" type of statement to README + slack-desc?
>>
>>
>> Maybe.  I want to see what klaatu says first (though I'm not
>> sure why it matters)...
>>
>>
>>> Also... "grep pixbuf */*/README" shows only desktop/wmdrawer and
>>> multimedia/LiVES actually require the gdk-pixbuf on SBo (graphics/gliv
>>> mentions it in the README too, but it's talking about the 2.x
>>> version).
>>>
>>> Maybe the [maintainer of LiVES] could see if there's a way
>>> to build against the 2.x version, and then the old one could
>>> just go away?
>>
>>
>> Klaatu, could you check on this?  I'd be surprised to learn that
>> it really requires a gtk+1 library...
>>
>>
>>> ...addendum: wmdrawer's README says "This requires gdk-pixbuf", but
>>> during the compile:
>>>
>>> > gcc -Wall -O2 -fPIC `pkg-config --cflags gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0`
>>> > -I/usr/include -DLINUX -DUSE_GDKPIXBUF2 -c utils.c
>>>
>>> It's using the 2.0 one that's in Slackware already (I don't even have
>>> the 1.x one installed). So, all it needs is a line removed from
>>> its README...
>>
>>
>> Yep, fixed in my git branch.  Thanks!
>>
>> -RW
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
> kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
> fedorareloaded.com
>


-- 
---
uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
kotizu al oggcastplanet.org/gnuWorldOrder
fedorareloaded.com