[Slackbuilds-users] Lapack SlackBuild
jamesslack at omnitude.net
Thu Jul 19 11:53:57 UTC 2012
That sounds like a wise approach!
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Serban Udrea
<serban.udrea at skmail.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> On 07/19/2012 05:36 AM, James Smith wrote:
>> Thanks for your comments. So you agree with my patch then? ;-)
> Not yet. Besides, even if I would agree, it's not against a script I
> For a final opinion, I need to check, if the change you propose(#)
> would impact at least on numpy and scipy, which I maintain -- not
> to speak about things I have in work, or the fact that others may
> need to check what happens with the lapack related software they
> provide a SlackBuild for(*). Sincerely speaking, it might be much
> easier to just patch hmatrix to also link against wathever kind of
> blas is installed. Still, it may not be the right way to go.
> Best regards,
> (#) And a similar one applied to lapack-atlas.
> (*) My feeling is that there would be no impact at all, but checking
> is better. Nevertheless, this would take me some time.
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
More information about the SlackBuilds-users