[Slackbuilds-users] openjdk8 compile (either manually or via sbotools) failing at openjdk7

[Habs]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Luc Van Rompaey wrote:

> Op wo 6 apr. 2022 om 10:10 schreef Arnaud via SlackBuilds-users <
> slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>:
>
>>>>> java.util.zip.ZipException: invalid entry CRC (expected 0x3943b2a7 but
>>>>> got 0xc7a06d31)
>>>>
>>>> This looks like you're inadvertently using the wrong set of source
>>>> files. Each new openjdk version has a new set of source files, many of
>>>> which have no version number (openjdk.tar.bz2, corba.tar.bz2, ...) so
>>>> your build system can easily pick up the wrong source file.
>>>>
>>>> chris
>>>
>>> Good morning all
>>>
>>> I do not doubt the comment above, but in this case, how could it be
>> unless
>>> the slackbuild source links are out of step/compromised/whatever.
>>>
>>> As I mentioned, it is a clean physical machine freshly installed and
>> then
>>> updated - no other [java related or other slackbuild addons etc]
>> downloads
>>> prior - and simply the source files linked in the slackbuild info.  Each
>>> slackbuild individually run using 'su -' (rather than using sbotools or
>>> similar) as required.  I don't even get to try openjdk8 (or download
>>> anything for it) as apache-ant, gcc5 and openjdk7 are listed as required
>>> first.  It is openjdk7 that is failing in that chain as such.
>>>
>>> That all said, I will go back and check the sources, though I think that
>>> has been done by Matteo.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Habs
>>
>> My comment will not add much to the problem, but my several tries are all
>> failing at the same place (ie: invalid entry CRC).
>> Be it on my master very unclean multilib box, a chroot, multilib or not,
>> updated and clean, or some other cleaner boxes, VMs, not multilib, I can't
>> make it build, and it always fails on the same place...
>>
>> But unlike others here, I don't pretend doing it on perfectly clean
>> installations (though always without any other java installed).
>> Although I am really sure my source packages are the right ones, MD5SUM
>> checked and all.
>>
>> --
>> Arnaud <arnaud.garcia-fernandez at laposte.net>
>>
>> Let me first tell you all that I have been out of the Slackware loop for a
> while and that I'm only just getting ready to install Slackware 15.0 on my
> new computer.
> Thus, for now, I cannot do any tests involving Slackware myself.
>
> Anyway, I remember looking into the different Apache Ant releases just
> before life interfered, and I was about to try and figure out how the Ant
> releases and the (Open)JDK version did and did not go together. I hadn't
> gotten far enough to draw any final conclusions, though, and I hadn't taken
> any meaningful notes yet.
>> _______________________________________________
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
> This ongoing discussion reminded me that I had sent in an update to the
> apache-ant slackbuild when I took it over. According to the SlackBuilds
> history, it had been at Ant version 1.9.9 until then, and I updated it to
> 1.9.14. Now, if I remember correctly, I had successfully compiled OpenJDK 7
> (and subsequently 8) before I took over the apache-ant slackbuild, and I
> don't believe that I have ever recompiled them since then.
>
> Anyway, to cut a long story short, I'm now wondering if, perhaps, the
> problem may have anything to do with the Apache Ant version. In other
> words, the build fails with Ant 1.9.14, but it may still complete
> successfully with Ant 1.9.9. May be worth a try. Then, if that works, I may
> attempt a build with the latest Ant 1.9.x revision (currently 1.9.16) and
> see what gives. In any case, there's no point in trying the build with Ant
> 1.10.x, since that cannot make sense of any Java run-time environment older
> than, I think, Java version 8 (and, consequently, the Java environment
> provided by gcc5).
>
> If anyone wants to try out the OpenJDK build with Apache Ant 1.9.9 while
> I'm getting ready for Slackware 15.0, the Ant versions can be downloaded
> from https://archive.apache.org/dist/ant/binaries/
>
> Let's hope we can work this issue out.
>
> Regards,
> Luc.
>
Good day all

I can confirm that using 1.9.9 does not resolve the issue from my attempt 
a short while ago.

Regards
Habs


--- Sent using Alpine/Pine, probably the best MUA ---

My Tox Messaging Id:
9F10AC64260ADEBAEA017ACB71B7CD2E962596FC4293025C0F79D77FFEB4CE5C7B0BED41D925
Get a client here: https://tox.chat/clients.html