[Slackbuilds-users] Patch to add Malloc=1 to Epiphany's desktop file?

[Charadon]

On 10/1/22 11:19, SlackerNET UK wrote:
> I am working in a little group of people to provide GNOME 43 for 
> Slackware current and Slackware 15.0.
> I didn't change the session.conf and org.gnome.Epiphany.desktop file. I 
> just created two files in /etc/profiles.d.
> epiphany.sh
> 
> #!/bin/sh
> export  WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0  
> export  GIGACAGE_ENABLED=0  
> export  G_SLICE=always-malloc
> export  Malloc=1
> 
> epiphany.csh
> 
> #!/bin/csh
> setenvWEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0  
> setenvGIGACAGE_ENABLED=0  
> setenvG_SLICE=always-malloc
> setenvMalloc=1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:13 PM Charadon via SlackBuilds-users 
> <slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org 
> <mailto:slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hey all,
> 
>     If it's alright with everyone, I want to patch the .desktop file for
>     the
>     Epiphany Browser to add the environment variable Malloc=1. It fixes a
>     lot of web page crashes that are related to xdg-desktop-portal crashing
>     constantly while using it.
> 
>     ~ Charadon
>     _______________________________________________
>     SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>     SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
>     <mailto:SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org>
>     https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>     <https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users>
>     Archives -
>     https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>     <https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/>
>     FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/ <https://slackbuilds.org/faq/>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
> 

Hmm, but would the WEBKIT_FORCE_SANDBOX=0 not make the browser less 
secure? Or does it mean something else than what I think (sandboxing 
tabs and all that)