[Slackbuilds-users] WIP: protobuf3 25.3

[Ruben Carlo Benante]

Hi Jeremi,



I did not rebuild clementine after updating protobuf3 at the time.

Since this is a prod machine, I won't be able to test.



I'm still looking for some guidelines on how developers usually create virtual machines to test. I used virtualbox when I developed for debian, but I don't like this approach anymore. I'm trying to learn LCX, and for slackware it doesn't have templates ready to go, so there is that.



Anyway, thanks for your reply. Good to know it works. I'm still waiting for the protobuf3 maintainer reply on the version numbers (previous email)



Cordialmente,



Ruben



--

Dr. Beco

AI Researcher










---- On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:45:43 -0300 Jeremy Hansen <jebrhansen+sbo at gmail.com> wrote ---



Did you rebuild clementine after updating protobuf3? You should be on build 2 of clementine as that includes fixes for the new protobuf3 version.



It works fine on my end (I'm the clementine maintainer).



Jeremy




On Sun, Mar 10, 2024, 1:51 PM Ruben Carlo Benante via SlackBuilds-users <mailto:slackbuilds-users at slackbuilds.org> wrote:



Another thing that may or may not be related:



The mp3 player Clementine has stoped working after upgrade.



I've returned to grpc-1.48.4 and protobuf3-3.20.1, and after the downgrade Clementine works fine again.



Cordialmente,
Ruben



--

Dr. Beco

AI Researcher










---- On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:54:41 -0300 Ruben Carlo Benante <mailto:rcb at beco.cc> wrote ---



Hello,



Is there an error in the version number? Or is it going from 3 to 25 and keep growing further in the next versions?



The following names are what it looked like in the past:



* Packages/protobuf-2.6.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.17.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.18.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.19.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.19.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.19.4-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.20.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-3.20.1-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz

* Packages/protobuf3-25.3-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz





I'm afraid slackpkg or sbotools or sbopkg will complain if the next comes with something like



 Packages/protobuf3-3.26.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz or something as previous format





Cordialmente,

Ruben



--

Dr. Beco

AI Researcher










---- On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 18:10:31 -0300 Giancarlo Dessì <mailto:slack at giand.it> wrote ---



Il 01/03/24 20:35, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> i have just started to work on protobuf3 updates, pushing 2y of works 
> by upstream since last update.
>
> However, there are 26 other scripts which depends on protobuf3, listed 
> here (https://slackbuilds.org/advsearch.php?q=protobuf3&stype=revdep1)
>
> although we do have CI engine that could help us test whether the new 
> update will break them or not, it won't help us testing the runtime 
> issues. Therefore, i would like to ask for help by those who are using 
> these 26 packages to see if by upgrading protobuf3 and rebuilding them 
> will have any runtime issues or not.
>
> I will keep the protobuf3 updates for future public update (like 1-2 
> weeks delay) to give others more time to test.
>
> The protobuf3 update can be seen here
> https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/log/?h=protobuf3-wip
>
> Big thanks in advance
>
At the moment I tested new protobuf3 in -current, it works for 
protobuf-c/postgis and qgis

After upgrade of protobuf3 the entire tree until qgis was broken, I had 
to rebuild protobuf-c and then postgis and finally qgis because protobuf 
is required as first level dependency also by qgis

-- 

*********************************************************
Giancarlo Dessì
https://www.giand.it
https://github.com/giandex

Slackware Linux... because it works!
*********************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20240311/4dd1cb07/attachment.htm>