[Slackbuilds-users] The name of buf SlackBuild

[Jeremy Hansen]

Did you try emailing the maintainer to see if they're willing to support
source builds or to simply rename their package to buf-bin?

Jeremy

On Sat, Jun 7, 2025, 9:44 AM fsLeg <fsleg at t-rg.ws> wrote:

> I maintain dart-sass. The developer decided to stop providing 32 bit
> binaries starting with the most recent version at the moment of writing,
> therefore I had to switch to building that package from source. One of
> the two dependencies is buf. I wrote a SlackBuild which builds buf and
> only then checked SBo to find that buf is already there. However, the
> script on SBo repackages a pre-built binary, and the only one available
> is for 64 bit systems, which defeats the purpose of me rewriting the
> script for dart-sass to support 32 bit Slackware.
>
> The problem is once again the naming conventions. The current buf should
> be called buf-bin instead so I could submit my script which builds buf
> from source. What should I do?
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20250607/8be28b87/attachment-0001.htm>