[Slackbuilds-users] Unchecked entries for 13.0

Pierre Cazenave pwcazenave at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 21:35:00 UTC 2009

Robby Workman wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:55:39 -0500
> Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
>> As I promised several people privately, here's a list of things that
>> we have not had time to check/update for 13.0 yet:
>>   http://slackbuilds.org/NOT_CHECKED
>> If you maintain one of these and would like to see it in the initial
>> repo for 13.0, or if you use one of them and would like to "step up"
>> and handle any needed changes, now is your chance.  I can't promise
>> that we'll be able to merge in all of the changes we get, even if
>> they are fixed, but we'll do our best.  
>> As things are merged into the 13.0 repo (which is still private,
>> and will be until 13.0 is released), we'll update the listing above,
>> so be sure to refresh that before replying.
>> Fixes should come in as replies to this mail, with a complete tarball
>> attached (just as if you were submitting it on the website - no source
>> code of the app should be included).
> I don't think I was clear about at least two points:
> 1. We don't much care for version bumps at this point *unless*
>    it's necessary to build on -current.  
> 2. If you can't test it on both 32bit and 64bit -current,
>    don't bother replying for now.  Later on (after the submit
>    form is open again), it won't be as big of a problem, but
>    for now, it is.
> -RW
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/

In which case, scratch mine. 64-bit is on my todo list.

More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list