[Slackbuilds-users] [FYI]SlackBuild for python modules should be architecture dependent

Grissiom chaos.proton at gmail.com
Fri May 29 01:15:55 UTC 2009

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:03, Robby Workman <rworkman at slackbuilds.org>wrote:

> Maybe, but I don't like the symlink idea at all.  We can't just symlink
> the entire /usr/lib (or /usr/lib64) directory, so we'd have to symlink
> each additional file in there, and along the way, check for existing
> files/dirs on the filesystem with the same names so that we don't wipe
> them, and if they exist already, then what?  Fail during installation?
> IMHO, if a package uses */lib64 then it's an ARCH=x86_64 package.

+1 for this ;)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20090529/60a30270/attachment.htm>

More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list