[Slackbuilds-users] lapack

[Robby Workman]

On Fri, 20 May 2011 18:52:13 +0300
Audrius Kažukauskas <audrius at neutrino.lt> wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:27:19 -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> > For me, it's no longer a problem; I got it built. My concern is
> > just that others might trip over this and waste time figuring out
> > what I already did. Maybe put a note on the page alerting people
> > that the version has changed, the slackbuild awaits updating, and
> > in the meantime, folks can build the package with
> > 
> > env VERSION=3.3.1 lapack.Slackbuild
> > 
> > ??
> 
> I think that's what MD5SUM is for -- to alert that something has
> changed in the source tarball.
> 
> Though I'm not sure why the current download link without version
> number in the file name was used at all (which was the source of
> confusion for Donald and probably will be for others).  After quick
> look in LAPACK website I've found the one containing version number:
> 
> http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack-3.3.0.tgz
> 
> Perhaps upstream didn't provide it in the past?


Correct, or if they did, we didn't know about it.
I've just fixed that in my git branch; thanks!

-RW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20110520/b4d1a473/attachment.asc>