[Slackbuilds-users] Samhain Update

[slackbuilds at jq.oc9.com]

Sorry for top posting, short comment. On slackware systems,
#!/bin/bash = #!/bin/sh so it is the same.

$ls -al /bin/sh
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 May 18  2013 /bin/sh -> bash
$



On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Richard Scott Smith wrote:

>
>
> Now I'm confused.  I don't use #!/bin/bash on anything.  I always use 
> #!/bin/sh.  Are you referring to the upstream source?  Or was I inadvertently 
> using bash specific features somewhere in the build script?
>
> Backing down the optimization on 64 bit only portion of the build scripts 
> should satisfy the multilib compilation.  Can you send me your changes, a git 
> patch is fine if you don't want upstream changes yet, so I can test on a 
> multilib system?  Or upstream is fine, just let me know which branch to pull 
> from and I'll test it.
>
> I know multilib is "not supported", but that's actually how I'm going to use 
> it for most of my systems.
>
> If you are in a hurry stop reading :-) A side note follows:
>
> My colo provider went out of business a couple of weeks ago.  I was being 
> auto billed, so I didn't know it until my server went offline.  No one 
> notified me.  I've been with these guys for 7 years.  So my server that was 
> 64 bit only, not multlib, is in limbo.  I'm waiting for the property 
> management attorney to let me have it back since they seized all the assets 
> of the colocation provider.
>
> My other systems rely on multilib because of skype and other 32 bit only 
> software.  I'm a consultant and I work with a lot of overseas groups, so I 
> end up having to use this stuff.  In addition, the kernel from Slackware 14.1 
> does not boot in the latest version of Virtualbox, it actually does work with 
> the 14.0's 3.2.29 kernel.  That's another story. I installed a 32 bit version 
> of Slackware 14.1 with the kernel from the previous version.  But that's not 
> a good test system.
>
> In short, my usual test systems are not available.  And I need my other 3 
> Slackware boxes for work.
>
> I appreciate the feedback on systems I simply don't have working right now. 
> I suppose it's time to switch off of Virtualbox and use another virtual 
> system for testing.  I just haven't had time to look into changing my working 
> habits.
>
> scott
>
> On 11/22/2013 02:20 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
>>> FYI, I tried this and seems to work fine on a pure x86_64 and x86
>>> (-O2optimizations there should be fine).
>>> I removed also some bash-specific lines (the interpreter of the
>>> scripts is set to /bin/sh).
>> 
>> Do you want to put this on your branch or mine?
>> 
>> 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>

Louis