[Slackbuilds-users] two blender packages?

[Christoph Willing]

On 06/11/15 09:26, Philip Lacroix wrote:
> Am 05.11.2015 23:49 schrieb Christoph Willing:
>> On 06/11/15 08:20, Philip Lacroix wrote:
>>> The content of the source archives (source code or binary) can be
>>> inferred from the names (and a quick look at the scripts), but perhaps a
>>> short note at the end of both READMEs would help to remove any
>>> ambiguities.
>>
>> I included such a note in the README when I first submitted the
>> SlackBuild for Blender (built from source code), since it was added
>> some time after the blender SlackBuild (repackaged binary). However
>> that section was cut from the version that was finally published - I
>> guess because the additional notes contained a lot of extra stuff
>> about how to build for maximum functionality (some of which impinged
>> on some SlackBuilds). Perhaps I should update Blender's README with a
>> minimal note about its difference from the blender SlackBuild; then
>> some other file about build optimisations.
>
> Sounds good. I noticed that the packages for Arduino have something like
> that. The notes in both READMEs could also mention each other's
> SlackBuilds, in order to make users fully aware of the choice.

I just noticed that the extra info is already in Blender's README.Slackware

chris