[Slackbuilds-users] poedit 2.0 in review

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

>> well, the developer said that boost 1.60 is required for executors to
>> work, so my "hack" is not recommended by upstream, so that means poedit
>> will have to stick to 1.8.x until next Slackware release.
>>
>> here's the official answer by upstream:
>> https://github.com/vslavik/poedit/issues/375
> 
> I see one line of actual helpful information there (from the git log),
> and a whole lot of unnecessarily rude invective.
> 
> And yes, for the record, I have run into stuff where a dependency's
> minimum version was set to whatever the author happened to have installed,
> without him checking if it worked on earlier versions. So your question
> was a valid one...

Now let's see if i can convince Patrick to bump boost in -stable (i'm
not really sure whether he will take it, but let's give it a try).


-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20170405/4cec0edc/attachment.asc>