[Slackbuilds-users] poedit 2.0 in review

Daniel Prosser dpross1100 at msn.com
Thu Apr 6 02:59:45 UTC 2017

Agreed. I'm not sure why the developer felt like he needed to be so rude
and condescending. He could have saved himself a lot of typing by just
politely explaining why 1.60 is needed and how to check in the git log.
Maybe it was just one of those days.

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:34:13AM -0400, B Watson wrote:
> On 4/5/17, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo <willysr at slackbuilds.org> wrote:
> >
> > well, the developer said that boost 1.60 is required for executors to
> > work, so my "hack" is not recommended by upstream, so that means poedit
> > will have to stick to 1.8.x until next Slackware release.
> >
> > here's the official answer by upstream:
> > https://github.com/vslavik/poedit/issues/375
> I see one line of actual helpful information there (from the git log),
> and a whole lot of unnecessarily rude invective.
> And yes, for the record, I have run into stuff where a dependency's
> minimum version was set to whatever the author happened to have installed,
> without him checking if it worked on earlier versions. So your question
> was a valid one...
> _______________________________________________
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org
> http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

More information about the SlackBuilds-users mailing list