[Slackbuilds-users] I failed to build qt5

[Dave Woodfall]

On 2020-05-05 19:23,
David Chmelik <davidnchmelik at gmail.com> put forth the proposition:
> On 5/5/20 5:31 PM, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> > On 2020-05-05 23:18,
> > M Wedin <wedinm at gmail.com> put forth the proposition:
> > > 2020-05-05 18:21 GMT+02:00, Dave Woodfall <dave at slackbuilds.org>:
> > > > On 2020-05-05 16:16,
> > > > M Wedin <wedinm at gmail.com> put forth the proposition:
> > > > > The old qt 5.9.9 was removed.
> > > > The old qt 5.9.9 was renamed to qt5-legacy.
> > > I removed it per recommendation. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wanted as
> > > few obstacles as possible.
> > >
> > > -------------
> > > If Qt5 fails to build, it may be worth using the following
> > > steps.
> > >
> > > 1 Uninstall the old Qt5 package
> > > -------------
> > My point was that if qt5-5.12 takes too long or won't build, then you
> > could use qt5-legacy instead of qt5.
>
> If all one has to do is remove & rebuild, surely it's worth the wait to
> compile to upgrade?  That's what I'll do.  Another option might be if one of
> almost all pre-built SlackOnly.com (‘slonly’) packages, if you judge them
> trustworthy.

I don't know slackonly enough to comment on that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/attachments/20200506/c418c53b/attachment.asc>